Blended Care Intervention for Cancer Aftercare in General Practice Centers: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Research Protocols Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.2196/64662
Michelle J M Smits, Catherine A W Bolman, Ilse Mesters, Lilian Lechner
{"title":"Blended Care Intervention for Cancer Aftercare in General Practice Centers: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Michelle J M Smits, Catherine A W Bolman, Ilse Mesters, Lilian Lechner","doi":"10.2196/64662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Combining effective eHealth programs with face-to-face consultations in general practice may help general practitioners care for survivors of cancer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study protocol describes a 2-armed randomized controlled trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a blended intervention integrating the Cancer Aftercare Guide in general practice centers (GPCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A parallel-group design will compare an intervention group with a waiting list control group. Participants will be nested within GPCs and randomization will occur at the GPC level. The participants in the intervention group will receive a blended care intervention. In contrast, the participants in the waiting list control group will receive care as usual for the duration of this study and will receive the online intervention afterward. All participants will be asked to complete an online questionnaire at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after baseline, measuring self-reported adherence to lifestyle recommendations, psychosocial well-being, and quality of life. A process evaluation and cost evaluation are also included in this study. The effects will be evaluated based on differences in residual change scores between intervention and control group participants, using multilevel linear regression analyses. Moreover, effect analyses will be supplemented with Bayes factor analyses. Finally, an economic evaluation will be conducted from a societal perspective and will include medical costs, productivity costs, and costs of the blended care intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study was funded in July 2020. Data collection started in August 2022 and is likely to be completed by April 2025. As of December 2024, a total of 127 participants have been included in this study, recruited across 26 GPCs in the Netherlands. Data analysis will commence once data collection is completed. Data analysis is estimated to start in the spring of 2025. The results will likely be published in 2026.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results will provide insight into the effectiveness of blended care and may be relevant to cancer aftercare, general practice, and the field of eHealth implementation in general. Potential challenges lie in recruitment due to the strain on the health care system since the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN ISRCTN12451453; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12451453.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/64662.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"14 ","pages":"e64662"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/64662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Combining effective eHealth programs with face-to-face consultations in general practice may help general practitioners care for survivors of cancer.

Objective: This study protocol describes a 2-armed randomized controlled trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a blended intervention integrating the Cancer Aftercare Guide in general practice centers (GPCs).

Methods: A parallel-group design will compare an intervention group with a waiting list control group. Participants will be nested within GPCs and randomization will occur at the GPC level. The participants in the intervention group will receive a blended care intervention. In contrast, the participants in the waiting list control group will receive care as usual for the duration of this study and will receive the online intervention afterward. All participants will be asked to complete an online questionnaire at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after baseline, measuring self-reported adherence to lifestyle recommendations, psychosocial well-being, and quality of life. A process evaluation and cost evaluation are also included in this study. The effects will be evaluated based on differences in residual change scores between intervention and control group participants, using multilevel linear regression analyses. Moreover, effect analyses will be supplemented with Bayes factor analyses. Finally, an economic evaluation will be conducted from a societal perspective and will include medical costs, productivity costs, and costs of the blended care intervention.

Results: This study was funded in July 2020. Data collection started in August 2022 and is likely to be completed by April 2025. As of December 2024, a total of 127 participants have been included in this study, recruited across 26 GPCs in the Netherlands. Data analysis will commence once data collection is completed. Data analysis is estimated to start in the spring of 2025. The results will likely be published in 2026.

Conclusions: The results will provide insight into the effectiveness of blended care and may be relevant to cancer aftercare, general practice, and the field of eHealth implementation in general. Potential challenges lie in recruitment due to the strain on the health care system since the COVID-19 pandemic.

Trial registration: ISRCTN ISRCTN12451453; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12451453.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/64662.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合医疗中心癌症术后护理的混合护理干预:随机对照试验方案。
背景:将有效的电子健康项目与全科医生的面对面咨询相结合,可以帮助全科医生照顾癌症幸存者。目的:本研究方案描述了一项双臂随机对照试验,以评估在全科医学中心(GPCs)整合癌症善后指南的混合干预的成本效益。方法:采用平行组设计,将干预组与等候名单对照组进行比较。参与者将被嵌套在GPC中,随机化将在GPC级别发生。干预组的参与者将接受混合护理干预。相比之下,等候名单对照组的参与者在研究期间将照常接受护理,并在研究结束后接受在线干预。所有参与者将被要求在基线、基线后6个月和12个月完成一份在线问卷,测量自我报告的生活方式建议依从性、社会心理健康和生活质量。本研究亦包括过程评估及成本评估。使用多水平线性回归分析,根据干预组和对照组参与者的剩余变化评分差异来评估效果。此外,效应分析将辅以贝叶斯因子分析。最后,将从社会角度进行经济评估,包括医疗成本、生产力成本和混合护理干预的成本。结果:本研究于2020年7月获得资助。数据收集于2022年8月开始,可能于2025年4月完成。截至2024年12月,共有127名参与者被纳入这项研究,他们来自荷兰的26个gpc。数据收集完成后,将开始数据分析。数据分析预计将于2025年春季开始。研究结果可能会在2026年公布。结论:该结果将为混合护理的有效性提供见解,并可能与癌症术后护理、全科实践和一般电子健康实施领域相关。由于COVID-19大流行以来卫生保健系统的压力,潜在的挑战在于招聘。试验注册:ISRCTN ISRCTN12451453;https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12451453.International注册报告标识符(irrid): DERR1-10.2196/64662。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Adaptation of a Protocol to Evaluate Online Recruitment Strategies for Mailing HIV Self-Tests and Pilot an Intervention to Improve Linkage to HIV Prevention and Care Among Transgender Women: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical, Histopathological, and Molecular Prognostic Factors Associated With Survival and Disease Progression in Adult Patients With Primary and Secondary Thyroid Lymphomas: Scoping Review Protocol. Toward Best Practice Guidelines and Curricula for Virtual Care (Telehealth) in a Cancer Center: Protocol for a Multimethod Study. Noninvasive Measurement of Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow in Shunted Hydrocephalus: Protocol for Scanner Calibration and Multisite Data Collection. Immediate and Sustained Effects of Intensive Equine-Assisted Physiotherapy Based on Neuroproprioceptive "Facilitation and Inhibition" on Psychomotor Development, Clinical Functions, Quality of Life, and Molecular Biological Indicators in Children With Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Protocol for a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1