Minimal Residual Disease-Based End Point for Accelerated Assessment of Clinical Trials in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Multiple Randomized Trials.

IF 41.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-10 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1200/JCO-24-02020
Qian Shi, Bruno Paiva, Levi D Pederson, Natalie Dimier, Ela Talpes, Thomas J Prior, Alberto Orfao, Philippe Moreau, Pieter Sonneveld, Shaji K Kumar, Jesse G Dixon, Reshma Patel, Blake J Bartlett, Jordan Schecter, Phillip McCarthy, Dirk Hose, Anja Seckinger, D'Agostino Mattia, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Stefania Oliva, Roger G Owen, Kenneth C Anderson, Jesús San-Miguel, Brian G M Durie, Nikhil Munshi
{"title":"Minimal Residual Disease-Based End Point for Accelerated Assessment of Clinical Trials in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Multiple Randomized Trials.","authors":"Qian Shi, Bruno Paiva, Levi D Pederson, Natalie Dimier, Ela Talpes, Thomas J Prior, Alberto Orfao, Philippe Moreau, Pieter Sonneveld, Shaji K Kumar, Jesse G Dixon, Reshma Patel, Blake J Bartlett, Jordan Schecter, Phillip McCarthy, Dirk Hose, Anja Seckinger, D'Agostino Mattia, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Stefania Oliva, Roger G Owen, Kenneth C Anderson, Jesús San-Miguel, Brian G M Durie, Nikhil Munshi","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-02020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Newly approved drugs and combinations treating multiple myeloma (MM) have resulted in substantial improvements in patients' survival. To deliver rapid access to newer therapies, an earlier end point to expedite clinical trials is needed. Our objective was to evaluate the minimal residual disease-negative complete response (MRD-CR) as an intermediate end point for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed (ND) transplant-eligible (NDTE) patients, ND transplant-ineligible (NDTinE) patients, and patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Individual patient data from 20 randomized multicenter trials were collected. Eleven studies (4,773 patients) with sufficient data were analyzed to evaluate whether 9- or 12-month MRD-CR classified at a 10<sup>-5</sup> threshold could be reasonably likely to predict the clinical benefit of new agents regarding PFS and OS. Global odds ratio (OR) was estimated using the bivariate Plackett Copula model. Supportive evaluation included correlations of the treatment effects on MRD-CR end points and PFS/OS, evaluated by both linear regression (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>weighted least squared</sub>) and Copula (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>Copula</sub>) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis demonstrated that both 9- and 12-month MRD-CR strongly correlated with PFS at patient level in NDTE patients, NDTinE patients, and patients with RRMM. Global ORs ranged from 3.06 to 16.24, all with 95% CIs excluding 1.0. Encouraging trial-level correlations (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, 0.61-0.70) were observed by pooling three populations and were stronger (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, 0.67-0.78) in the ND population. Similar results were observed for OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provided the support for use of MRD-CR classified at a 10<sup>-5</sup> threshold at either 9 or 12 months after starting of the treatment, as an intermediate end point to support accelerated approvals, in future trials in NDTE patients, NDTinE patients, and patients with RRMM.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1289-1301"},"PeriodicalIF":41.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Newly approved drugs and combinations treating multiple myeloma (MM) have resulted in substantial improvements in patients' survival. To deliver rapid access to newer therapies, an earlier end point to expedite clinical trials is needed. Our objective was to evaluate the minimal residual disease-negative complete response (MRD-CR) as an intermediate end point for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed (ND) transplant-eligible (NDTE) patients, ND transplant-ineligible (NDTinE) patients, and patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM.

Patients and methods: Individual patient data from 20 randomized multicenter trials were collected. Eleven studies (4,773 patients) with sufficient data were analyzed to evaluate whether 9- or 12-month MRD-CR classified at a 10-5 threshold could be reasonably likely to predict the clinical benefit of new agents regarding PFS and OS. Global odds ratio (OR) was estimated using the bivariate Plackett Copula model. Supportive evaluation included correlations of the treatment effects on MRD-CR end points and PFS/OS, evaluated by both linear regression (R2weighted least squared) and Copula (R2Copula) models.

Results: The analysis demonstrated that both 9- and 12-month MRD-CR strongly correlated with PFS at patient level in NDTE patients, NDTinE patients, and patients with RRMM. Global ORs ranged from 3.06 to 16.24, all with 95% CIs excluding 1.0. Encouraging trial-level correlations (R2, 0.61-0.70) were observed by pooling three populations and were stronger (R2, 0.67-0.78) in the ND population. Similar results were observed for OS.

Conclusion: Our findings provided the support for use of MRD-CR classified at a 10-5 threshold at either 9 or 12 months after starting of the treatment, as an intermediate end point to support accelerated approvals, in future trials in NDTE patients, NDTinE patients, and patients with RRMM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加速评估多发性骨髓瘤临床试验的最小残留疾病终点:来自多个随机试验的个体患者数据的汇总分析
目的:新批准的治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的药物和联合疗法显著提高了患者的生存率。为了快速获得新疗法,需要一个更早的终点来加快临床试验。我们的目的是评估最小残留疾病阴性完全缓解(MRD-CR)作为新诊断(ND)移植合格(NDTE)患者,ND移植不合格(NDTinE)患者和复发/难治性(RR) mm患者的无进展生存(PFS)和总生存(OS)的中间终点。患者和方法:收集了来自20个随机多中心试验的个体患者数据。11项研究(4773例患者)有足够的数据进行分析,以评估9个月或12个月MRD-CR分类为10-5阈值是否可以合理地预测新药在PFS和OS方面的临床获益。使用双变量Plackett Copula模型估计全局优势比(OR)。支持性评价包括治疗效果对MRD-CR终点和PFS/OS的相关性,采用线性回归(r2加权最小二乘法)和Copula (R2Copula)模型进行评估。结果:分析表明,在NDTE患者、NDTinE患者和RRMM患者中,9个月和12个月的MRD-CR与患者水平的PFS密切相关。总体or范围为3.06 - 16.24,ci均为95%,不包括1.0。合并三个人群观察到令人鼓舞的试验水平相关性(R2, 0.61-0.70),并且在ND人群中更强(R2, 0.67-0.78)。在OS中观察到类似的结果。结论:我们的研究结果为在治疗开始后9个月或12个月使用10-5阈值的MRD-CR提供了支持,作为支持加速批准的中间终点,在NDTE患者,NDTinE患者和RRMM患者的未来试验中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
期刊最新文献
Gene Therapy-Related Malignancy and the Risk of Cancer Exceptionalism. Quiet Work of Clarity. Survival Outcomes With or Without Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers. Pivekimab Sunirine in Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm. Long-Term Prospective Cohort Study of Cervical Cancer Screening Using Triage of Women Who Are Human Papillomavirus-Positive With Dual Stain and Human Papillomavirus Genotyping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1