Comparison of the Efficacy of Transurethral Cystolithotripsy and Percutaneous Cystolithotomy in the Treatment of Male Children with 20-30 mm Bladder Stones: A Retrospective Study.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Archivos Espanoles De Urologia Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257801.9
Yichun Xie, Mingchun Zhang, Ke Liu
{"title":"Comparison of the Efficacy of Transurethral Cystolithotripsy and Percutaneous Cystolithotomy in the Treatment of Male Children with 20-30 mm Bladder Stones: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Yichun Xie, Mingchun Zhang, Ke Liu","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257801.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) and percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCL) in treating 20-30 mm bladder stones in male children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on 62 male children of ≤16 years of age who were admitted to our hospital with bladder stones between January 2020 and December 2023 were retrospectively collected. The patients were categorised into a TUCL group (TUCL, n = 32) and a PCCL group (PCCL, n = 30) according to the employed surgical method. Operative time, stone-free rate (SFR), complication incidence, and general information of the patients were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in age, stone size, composition, and other general medical history were observed between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). SFR was 100% in both groups, but the operative time in the TUCL group was significantly longer than that in the PCCL group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, catheter indwelling time in the TUCL group was significantly shorter than that in the PCCL group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No significant difference in the overall complication incidence was found between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05), whereas the number of urinary retention cases was higher in the TUCL group than in the PCCL group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TUCL and PCCL are effective surgical methods for treating 20-30 mm bladder stones in male children. Compared to TUCL, PCCL may be the preferred option owing to its relatively shorter operative time and lower complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"78 1","pages":"71-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257801.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) and percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCL) in treating 20-30 mm bladder stones in male children.

Methods: Data on 62 male children of ≤16 years of age who were admitted to our hospital with bladder stones between January 2020 and December 2023 were retrospectively collected. The patients were categorised into a TUCL group (TUCL, n = 32) and a PCCL group (PCCL, n = 30) according to the employed surgical method. Operative time, stone-free rate (SFR), complication incidence, and general information of the patients were compared between the two groups.

Results: No significant differences in age, stone size, composition, and other general medical history were observed between the two groups (p > 0.05). SFR was 100% in both groups, but the operative time in the TUCL group was significantly longer than that in the PCCL group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, catheter indwelling time in the TUCL group was significantly shorter than that in the PCCL group (p < 0.05). No significant difference in the overall complication incidence was found between the two groups (p > 0.05), whereas the number of urinary retention cases was higher in the TUCL group than in the PCCL group.

Conclusions: TUCL and PCCL are effective surgical methods for treating 20-30 mm bladder stones in male children. Compared to TUCL, PCCL may be the preferred option owing to its relatively shorter operative time and lower complication rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经尿道膀胱结石取石术与经皮膀胱结石取石术治疗20 ~ 30mm男童膀胱结石的回顾性研究
目的:探讨经尿道膀胱结石取石术(TUCL)和经皮膀胱结石取石术(PCCL)治疗20 ~ 30mm男性儿童膀胱结石的临床疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性收集2020年1月至2023年12月期间因膀胱结石入院的62例≤16岁男性儿童的资料。根据采用的手术方式将患者分为TUCL组(n = 32)和PCCL组(n = 30)。比较两组患者手术时间、结石清除率(SFR)、并发症发生率及一般情况。结果:两组患者年龄、结石大小、结石组成及其他一般病史均无统计学差异(p < 0.05)。两组SFR均为100%,但TUCL组手术时间明显长于PCCL组(p < 0.05)。TUCL组留置导管时间明显短于PCCL组(p < 0.05)。两组总并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05),尿潴留发生率TUCL组高于PCCL组。结论:TUCL和PCCL是治疗20 ~ 30mm男性儿童膀胱结石的有效手术方法。与TUCL相比,PCCL因其相对较短的手术时间和较低的并发症发生率可能是首选的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models for Pediatric Kidney Stone Patient Education: A Multi-dimensional Assessment of Readability, Quality and Reliability. Comparison of Ureteral Stone Volume and Maximum Stone Length in Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Success. Controlled Study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Sedation in Transurethral Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy under Combined Spinal-Epidural Anaesthesia. Component Analysis of Urinary Calculi in 607 Patients From Jiaxing Region: A Single-Center Study. Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Complications of Urethral Realignment and Primary Urethral Anastomosis for Traumatic Urethral Injuries in Emergency Surgical Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1