Family-centered care in the neonatal intensive care unit: a meta-analysis and systematic review of outcomes for preterm infants.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Translational pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-24 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.21037/tp-24-373
Shuang Chen, Hong Shen, Qiuhong Jin, Liangping Zhou, Lin Feng
{"title":"Family-centered care in the neonatal intensive care unit: a meta-analysis and systematic review of outcomes for preterm infants.","authors":"Shuang Chen, Hong Shen, Qiuhong Jin, Liangping Zhou, Lin Feng","doi":"10.21037/tp-24-373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of family integrated care for preterm infants is not well established. This meta-analysis aims to assess the impact of family-integrated care on preterm infants to inform neonatal clinical practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Weipu, and Wanfang databases up to August 25, 2024. Two researchers independently screened articles, applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and performed quality assessments and data extraction. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, encompassing 3,005 preterm infants, of which 1,390 received family-integrated care. Family-integrated care significantly improved breastfeeding rates [odds ratio (OR) =5.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.37 to 14.82, P<0.001], weight gain [mean difference (MD) =3.16, 95% CI: 2.51 to 3.80, P<0.001], and sleep duration (MD =3.25, 95% CI: 2.05 to 4.44, P<0.001) in preterm infants and reduced the one-month readmission rate (OR =0.37, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.61, P<0.001). Egger's regression test indicated no publication bias among the outcomes (all P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Family-integrated care markedly improves breastfeeding rates, promotes weight gain, and extends sleep duration in preterm infants, while concurrently reducing the likelihood of hospital readmission. This approach offers substantial benefits to both the preterm infants and their families, highlighting its potential for wider implementation in neonatal nursing practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23294,"journal":{"name":"Translational pediatrics","volume":"14 1","pages":"14-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-24-373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of family integrated care for preterm infants is not well established. This meta-analysis aims to assess the impact of family-integrated care on preterm infants to inform neonatal clinical practices.

Methods: We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Weipu, and Wanfang databases up to August 25, 2024. Two researchers independently screened articles, applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and performed quality assessments and data extraction. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results: Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, encompassing 3,005 preterm infants, of which 1,390 received family-integrated care. Family-integrated care significantly improved breastfeeding rates [odds ratio (OR) =5.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.37 to 14.82, P<0.001], weight gain [mean difference (MD) =3.16, 95% CI: 2.51 to 3.80, P<0.001], and sleep duration (MD =3.25, 95% CI: 2.05 to 4.44, P<0.001) in preterm infants and reduced the one-month readmission rate (OR =0.37, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.61, P<0.001). Egger's regression test indicated no publication bias among the outcomes (all P>0.05).

Conclusions: Family-integrated care markedly improves breastfeeding rates, promotes weight gain, and extends sleep duration in preterm infants, while concurrently reducing the likelihood of hospital readmission. This approach offers substantial benefits to both the preterm infants and their families, highlighting its potential for wider implementation in neonatal nursing practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿重症监护室中以家庭为中心的护理:早产儿疗效的荟萃分析和系统回顾。
背景:早产儿家庭综合护理的效果尚不明确。本荟萃分析旨在评估家庭综合护理对早产儿的影响,为新生儿临床实践提供信息。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、唯普、万方等数据库,检索时间截止到2024年8月25日。两名研究人员独立筛选文章,应用预定义的纳入和排除标准,并进行质量评估和数据提取。采用RevMan 5.3软件进行meta分析。结果:纳入13项随机对照试验(RCTs),共纳入3,005例早产儿,其中1,390例接受家庭综合护理。家庭综合护理显著提高母乳喂养率[优势比(OR) =5.92, 95%可信区间(CI): 2.37 ~ 14.82, P0.05]。结论:家庭综合护理显著提高了早产儿的母乳喂养率,促进体重增加,延长睡眠时间,同时降低了再次住院的可能性。这种方法为早产儿及其家庭提供了实质性的好处,突出了其在新生儿护理实践中更广泛实施的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational pediatrics
Translational pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Clinicopathological characteristics and etiological considerations of isolated fallopian tube torsion in pediatric patients: a single center study. Determinants of intertransfusion interval in children with transfusion-dependent thalassemia: a retrospective single-center cohort study in China. Development and validation of an early predictive model for coronary artery lesions in incomplete Kawasaki disease. Efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of STAT3 loss-of-function mutations associated with autosomal dominant hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome-a case report. Endoscopic versus open resection of pediatric periorbital masses using a novel subcutaneous operative channel: a focus on safety and aesthetic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1