The Impact of Preoperative Visits Using the Omaha System on Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: Improvement in Sleep Quality and Negative Psychological Aspects.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Archivos Espanoles De Urologia Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257801.7
Miaomiao Geng, Chenghong Xiang, Jing Huang
{"title":"The Impact of Preoperative Visits Using the Omaha System on Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: Improvement in Sleep Quality and Negative Psychological Aspects.","authors":"Miaomiao Geng, Chenghong Xiang, Jing Huang","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257801.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Omaha System, recognised for its comprehensive approach that encompasses physical, psychosocial, and environmental factors, has shown promise in improving patient outcomes across various healthcare settings. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative visits conducted using the Omaha System on patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), with a specific focus on sleep quality and negative psychological aspects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients scheduled for TURP between March 2022 and March 2024. Patients were categorised into two groups based on the preoperative visit methods: Traditional preoperative visits and those utilising the Omaha System. A total of 120 patients were included in the study, with 68 patients experiencing traditional preoperative visits and 52 patients receiving visits using the Omaha System. Various parameters, including sleep quality, psychological aspects, and clinical characteristics, were assessed and analysed both preoperatively and postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in sleep quality parameters or negative psychological aspects between the two groups. However, postoperatively, the group that received preoperative visits using the Omaha System demonstrated significant improvements in sleep quality, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score (<i>p</i> = 0.015), sleep latency (<i>p</i> = 0.043), sleep duration (<i>p</i> = 0.002), sleep efficiency (<i>p</i> = 0.004), and sleep disturbances (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Additionally, reductions in anxiety (<i>p</i> = 0.006), depression (<i>p</i> = 0.028), stress (<i>p</i> = 0.025), fear related to the surgery (<i>p</i> = 0.009), and uncertainty (<i>p</i> = 0.005) were observed postoperatively in the Omaha System group compared to the traditional visit group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of preoperative visits using the Omaha System significantly improved postoperative sleep quality and reduced negative psychological aspects among patients undergoing TURP.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"78 1","pages":"56-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257801.7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Omaha System, recognised for its comprehensive approach that encompasses physical, psychosocial, and environmental factors, has shown promise in improving patient outcomes across various healthcare settings. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative visits conducted using the Omaha System on patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), with a specific focus on sleep quality and negative psychological aspects.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients scheduled for TURP between March 2022 and March 2024. Patients were categorised into two groups based on the preoperative visit methods: Traditional preoperative visits and those utilising the Omaha System. A total of 120 patients were included in the study, with 68 patients experiencing traditional preoperative visits and 52 patients receiving visits using the Omaha System. Various parameters, including sleep quality, psychological aspects, and clinical characteristics, were assessed and analysed both preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results: Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in sleep quality parameters or negative psychological aspects between the two groups. However, postoperatively, the group that received preoperative visits using the Omaha System demonstrated significant improvements in sleep quality, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score (p = 0.015), sleep latency (p = 0.043), sleep duration (p = 0.002), sleep efficiency (p = 0.004), and sleep disturbances (p = 0.004). Additionally, reductions in anxiety (p = 0.006), depression (p = 0.028), stress (p = 0.025), fear related to the surgery (p = 0.009), and uncertainty (p = 0.005) were observed postoperatively in the Omaha System group compared to the traditional visit group.

Conclusions: The implementation of preoperative visits using the Omaha System significantly improved postoperative sleep quality and reduced negative psychological aspects among patients undergoing TURP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前访问使用奥马哈系统对经尿道前列腺切除术患者的影响:改善睡眠质量和消极心理方面
背景:奥马哈系统以其涵盖身体、社会心理和环境因素的综合方法而闻名,在改善各种医疗保健环境中的患者预后方面表现出了希望。本研究旨在探讨使用奥马哈系统进行的术前访视对经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)患者的影响,特别关注睡眠质量和负面心理方面。方法:回顾性队列研究,纳入计划于2022年3月至2024年3月进行TURP的患者。根据术前访视方法将患者分为两组:传统的术前访视和使用奥马哈系统的患者。研究共纳入120例患者,其中68例患者采用传统术前访视,52例患者采用奥马哈系统访视。术前和术后对包括睡眠质量、心理方面和临床特征在内的各种参数进行评估和分析。结果:术前两组患者在睡眠质量参数及消极心理方面均无显著差异。然而,术后,接受术前访问使用奥马哈系统的组显示出睡眠质量的显著改善,包括匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)整体评分(p = 0.015),睡眠潜伏期(p = 0.043),睡眠持续时间(p = 0.002),睡眠效率(p = 0.004)和睡眠障碍(p = 0.004)。此外,与传统就诊组相比,奥马哈系统组术后焦虑(p = 0.006)、抑郁(p = 0.028)、压力(p = 0.025)、与手术相关的恐惧(p = 0.009)和不确定性(p = 0.005)均有所减少。结论:采用奥马哈系统进行术前访视可显著改善TURP患者的术后睡眠质量,减少患者的负面心理因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models for Pediatric Kidney Stone Patient Education: A Multi-dimensional Assessment of Readability, Quality and Reliability. Comparison of Ureteral Stone Volume and Maximum Stone Length in Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Success. Controlled Study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Sedation in Transurethral Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy under Combined Spinal-Epidural Anaesthesia. Component Analysis of Urinary Calculi in 607 Patients From Jiaxing Region: A Single-Center Study. Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Complications of Urethral Realignment and Primary Urethral Anastomosis for Traumatic Urethral Injuries in Emergency Surgical Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1