{"title":"Development and validation of a safety behavior scale for industrial workplaces.","authors":"Mohsen Mahdinia, Iraj Mohammadfam, Maryam Seyedtabib, Alireza Omidi Oskouei, Hamed Aghaei, Ahmad Soltanzadeh","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2025.2454133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. Leading indicators are an important approach for evaluating safety performance. Safety behavior is one of the leading indicators and the existence of a valid and standardized tool to measure safety behavior is essential. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide a standard tool for assessing safety behavior in industrial workplaces. <i>Methods</i>. A preliminary questionnaire with 25 items was prepared based on a comprehensive literature review. After performing face validity, content validity, construct validity and reliability checks, a 22-item questionnaire was finally validated to assess safety behavior. Data analysis was conducted by Smart-PLS version 3. <i>Results</i>. The content validity revealed that 22 items of the questionnaire had a content validity index and a content validity ratio greater than 0.78 and 0.62, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis showed safety behavior with 22 items in three dimensions, which explained a total of 59.3% of the changes in safety behavior. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the structures of the safety behavior questionnaire. Composite reliability and Cronbach's <i>α</i> for 22 items were found to be 0.93 and 0.92, respectively, pointing to excellent instrument reliability. <i>Conclusion</i>. This study provides a valid and reliable tool for measuring the safety behavior of employees in different industries.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"545-553"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2025.2454133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives. Leading indicators are an important approach for evaluating safety performance. Safety behavior is one of the leading indicators and the existence of a valid and standardized tool to measure safety behavior is essential. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide a standard tool for assessing safety behavior in industrial workplaces. Methods. A preliminary questionnaire with 25 items was prepared based on a comprehensive literature review. After performing face validity, content validity, construct validity and reliability checks, a 22-item questionnaire was finally validated to assess safety behavior. Data analysis was conducted by Smart-PLS version 3. Results. The content validity revealed that 22 items of the questionnaire had a content validity index and a content validity ratio greater than 0.78 and 0.62, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis showed safety behavior with 22 items in three dimensions, which explained a total of 59.3% of the changes in safety behavior. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the structures of the safety behavior questionnaire. Composite reliability and Cronbach's α for 22 items were found to be 0.93 and 0.92, respectively, pointing to excellent instrument reliability. Conclusion. This study provides a valid and reliable tool for measuring the safety behavior of employees in different industries.
目标。领先指标是评价安全性能的重要手段。安全行为是主要的指标之一,有一个有效的、标准化的工具来衡量安全行为是必不可少的。因此,本研究的目的是为评估工业工作场所的安全行为提供一个标准工具。方法。在全面查阅文献的基础上,编制了一份包含25个项目的初步问卷。经面效度、内容效度、结构效度和信度检验后,最终对一份共22项的安全行为问卷进行验证。数据分析采用Smart-PLS version 3进行。结果。内容效度结果显示,22项问卷的内容效度指数和内容效度比分别大于0.78和0.62。探索性因子分析显示,安全行为在三个维度中包含22个项目,共解释了59.3%的安全行为变化。验证性因子分析确定了安全行为问卷的结构。22个项目的复合信度和Cronbach's α分别为0.93和0.92,表明仪器信度良好。结论。本研究为衡量不同行业员工的安全行为提供了有效可靠的工具。