The New Organization of Ethics Committees in Italy: What is the Future of Clinical Ethics?

IF 1.5 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1007/s11673-024-10389-1
Pietro Refolo, Costanza Raimondi, Dario Sacchini, Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo
{"title":"The New Organization of Ethics Committees in Italy: What is the Future of Clinical Ethics?","authors":"Pietro Refolo, Costanza Raimondi, Dario Sacchini, Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo","doi":"10.1007/s11673-024-10389-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Italy, clinical ethics is not well institutionalized. On February 7, 2023, the Italian Ministry of Health published four long-awaited decrees regarding the reorganization of ethics committees.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this article is twofold: firstly, we aim to briefly summarize the development of clinical ethics in Italy from a legislative point of view; secondly, we aim to examine how Italian regions are implementing the part of the new decrees on the organization of ethics committees that concerns clinical ethics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As for the first aim, we conducted a critical interpretive review (CIR). The search was restricted to the opinions offered by the Italian National Bioethics Committee (CNB) and to the major Italian legislative decrees on the topic. Regarding the second aim, we conducted an online search through Regional Official Bulletins of each Italian region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis showed that despite the recommendations from the CNB to differentiate Research Ethics Committees (RECs) and Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs), over the years legislative attention has mainly focused on RECs and pharmacological matters. The new decrees allow regions to be flexible in organizing their activities. However, it emerged that only four regions (Veneto, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Puglia, Emilia-Romagna) have split the roles, while all the other regions have entrusted both roles to a single committee.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk for Italy is to take a step backward in the development of clinical ethics. Possible solutions could be either making Local Ethics Committees (CELs) mandatory or institutionalizing Ethics Consultation services (ECSs).</p>","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":"405-414"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-024-10389-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Italy, clinical ethics is not well institutionalized. On February 7, 2023, the Italian Ministry of Health published four long-awaited decrees regarding the reorganization of ethics committees.

Aim: The aim of this article is twofold: firstly, we aim to briefly summarize the development of clinical ethics in Italy from a legislative point of view; secondly, we aim to examine how Italian regions are implementing the part of the new decrees on the organization of ethics committees that concerns clinical ethics.

Methods: As for the first aim, we conducted a critical interpretive review (CIR). The search was restricted to the opinions offered by the Italian National Bioethics Committee (CNB) and to the major Italian legislative decrees on the topic. Regarding the second aim, we conducted an online search through Regional Official Bulletins of each Italian region.

Results: Our analysis showed that despite the recommendations from the CNB to differentiate Research Ethics Committees (RECs) and Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs), over the years legislative attention has mainly focused on RECs and pharmacological matters. The new decrees allow regions to be flexible in organizing their activities. However, it emerged that only four regions (Veneto, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Puglia, Emilia-Romagna) have split the roles, while all the other regions have entrusted both roles to a single committee.

Conclusion: The risk for Italy is to take a step backward in the development of clinical ethics. Possible solutions could be either making Local Ethics Committees (CELs) mandatory or institutionalizing Ethics Consultation services (ECSs).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利伦理委员会的新组织:临床伦理的未来是什么?
背景:在意大利,临床伦理学没有很好地制度化。2023年2月7日,意大利卫生部公布了四项期待已久的关于伦理委员会重组的法令。目的:本文的目的有两个:首先,我们旨在从立法的角度简要总结意大利临床伦理学的发展;其次,我们的目标是研究意大利地区如何实施关于组织伦理委员会的新法令的一部分,涉及临床伦理。方法:针对第一个目的,我们进行了批判性解释性综述(CIR)。搜索仅限于意大利国家生物伦理委员会(CNB)提供的意见和意大利关于该主题的主要立法法令。关于第二个目标,我们通过意大利每个地区的区域官方公报进行了在线搜索。结果:我们的分析表明,尽管CNB建议区分研究伦理委员会(RECs)和临床伦理委员会(CECs),但多年来立法的注意力主要集中在RECs和药理学问题上。新法令允许各地区灵活地组织活动。然而,只有四个大区(威尼托、弗留利-威尼斯-朱利亚、普利亚、艾米利亚-罗马涅)将这两个角色分开,而其他所有大区都将这两个角色委托给了一个委员会。结论:意大利面临的风险是临床伦理学的发展出现倒退。可行的解决方案可以是强制设立地方道德委员会或将道德咨询服务制度化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JBI welcomes both reports of empirical research and articles that increase theoretical understanding of medicine and health care, the health professions and the biological sciences. The JBI is also open to critical reflections on medicine and conventional bioethics, the nature of health, illness and disability, the sources of ethics, the nature of ethical communities, and possible implications of new developments in science and technology for social and cultural life and human identity. We welcome contributions from perspectives that are less commonly published in existing journals in the field and reports of empirical research studies using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The JBI accepts contributions from authors working in or across disciplines including – but not limited to – the following: -philosophy- bioethics- economics- social theory- law- public health and epidemiology- anthropology- psychology- feminism- gay and lesbian studies- linguistics and discourse analysis- cultural studies- disability studies- history- literature and literary studies- environmental sciences- theology and religious studies
期刊最新文献
Eco-Bio-Communitarianism and Its Application to Clinical Research, Global Health, Biotechnology, and Environmental Protection. Epilepsy, Ethics, Ethnicity: "Making and Unmaking" Elsie Lacks at Crownsville State Hospital in The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. Use of HIV Phylogenetic Analysis in Public Health in Victoria, Australia: Regulatory Considerations. Moral Deference and the War in Gaza. Decision Ownership and Deference to Healthcare AI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1