Exploring Suitability of Low-Severity Rating Hospital Incident Reports for Machine Learning.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000001249
Rebecca Miriam Jedwab, Leonard Hoon, Caroline Luu, Bernice Redley
{"title":"Exploring Suitability of Low-Severity Rating Hospital Incident Reports for Machine Learning.","authors":"Rebecca Miriam Jedwab, Leonard Hoon, Caroline Luu, Bernice Redley","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic incident reporting is a key quality and a safety process for healthcare organizations that assists in evaluating performance and informing quality improvement initiatives. Although it is mandatory for high-severity incident reports to be investigated, the majority, classified as low severity, are seldom examined due to the large volume of reports, constraints of human cognitive capacity to process such large amounts of data, and the limited resources available in healthcare organizations. The purpose of this study was to investigate low-severity incident reports for suitability of future machine learning to identify actionable interventions for harm prevention. This qualitative descriptive study used a yearlong dataset of low incident severity rating reports to model the incident reporting documentation workflow and explored findings with five nursing and healthcare quality and safety experts. Incident severity reports were reported to have multiple conflicting issues including information duplication, subjective data, too many selection options, and absence of contextual information resulting in a lack of usefulness of information for machine learning. Next steps include analysis of a dataset for machine learning suitability. Recommendations include end-user involvement in system redesign to ensure hospital incident reports are comprised of meaningful data.</p>","PeriodicalId":50694,"journal":{"name":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic incident reporting is a key quality and a safety process for healthcare organizations that assists in evaluating performance and informing quality improvement initiatives. Although it is mandatory for high-severity incident reports to be investigated, the majority, classified as low severity, are seldom examined due to the large volume of reports, constraints of human cognitive capacity to process such large amounts of data, and the limited resources available in healthcare organizations. The purpose of this study was to investigate low-severity incident reports for suitability of future machine learning to identify actionable interventions for harm prevention. This qualitative descriptive study used a yearlong dataset of low incident severity rating reports to model the incident reporting documentation workflow and explored findings with five nursing and healthcare quality and safety experts. Incident severity reports were reported to have multiple conflicting issues including information duplication, subjective data, too many selection options, and absence of contextual information resulting in a lack of usefulness of information for machine learning. Next steps include analysis of a dataset for machine learning suitability. Recommendations include end-user involvement in system redesign to ensure hospital incident reports are comprised of meaningful data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing 工程技术-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing has been at the interface of the science of information and the art of nursing, publishing articles on the latest developments in nursing informatics, research, education and administrative of health information technology. CIN connects you with colleagues as they share knowledge on implementation of electronic health records systems, design decision-support systems, incorporate evidence-based healthcare in practice, explore point-of-care computing in practice and education, and conceptually integrate nursing languages and standard data sets. Continuing education contact hours are available in every issue.
期刊最新文献
Cross-sectional Analysis of Zoom Fatigue on Clinical Decision-making in Nursing Students. The Effect of Game-Based Technology on Undergraduate Nursing Students' Knowledge and Motivation: Mixed-Methods Study. A Cross-Sectional Study Exploring Nurse Burnout and Satisfaction With the Electronic Health Record. A Phased Competency Model for Electronic Health Record Usability. Development and Pilot Testing of a Mobile App-Based Chatbot for the Self-management of Physical Activity for Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1