Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor for PD-L1 Inhibitor Treatment in Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1002/hed.28101
Kun Gao, Zhigong Wei, Zheran Liu, Yiyan Pei, Huilin Li, Ge Song, Jin Xiang, Junyou Ge, Yan Qing, Youneng Wei, Ping Ai, Ye Chen, Xingchen Peng
{"title":"Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor for PD-L1 Inhibitor Treatment in Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.","authors":"Kun Gao, Zhigong Wei, Zheran Liu, Yiyan Pei, Huilin Li, Ge Song, Jin Xiang, Junyou Ge, Yan Qing, Youneng Wei, Ping Ai, Ye Chen, Xingchen Peng","doi":"10.1002/hed.28101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can be treated as a simple indicator of patients' immune status by representing the state of the systemic inflammatory response. Immunotherapy now is the accepted second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC). However, the significance of NLR in patients with R/M NPC undergoing treatment with PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1) inhibitors is still uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the relationship between baseline NLR with 153 patients' efficacy and survival from a multicenter, prospective, Phase 2 study. We employed restricted cubic spline plots to get the nonlinear relationship between NLR and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). We identified the ideal cut-off value through the analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve). We used Logistic regression, Cox regression, Log-rank test, and Kaplan-Meier method to analyze the association between NLR and patients' disease control rate (DCR) and PFS or OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ideal threshold value for NLR was 2.826. NLR was identified as a significant independent predictor of DCR (OR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.05-0.48, p = 0.001), indicating that a higher NLR is associated with worse DCR. NLR (AUC = 0.634) showed superior predictive capability for DCR in comparison to lymphocytes (AUC = 0.602) and neutrophils (AUC = 0.593). High NLR values were risk factors both for poor PFS (HR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.58-4.06, p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 3.89, 95% CI = 2.09-7.24, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated NLR is strongly associated with lower response to treatment and reduced survival rates in patients with R/M NPC being treated with PD-L1 inhibitors. Patients with high NLR values have poor efficacy and survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.28101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can be treated as a simple indicator of patients' immune status by representing the state of the systemic inflammatory response. Immunotherapy now is the accepted second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC). However, the significance of NLR in patients with R/M NPC undergoing treatment with PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1) inhibitors is still uncertain.

Methods: We analyzed the relationship between baseline NLR with 153 patients' efficacy and survival from a multicenter, prospective, Phase 2 study. We employed restricted cubic spline plots to get the nonlinear relationship between NLR and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). We identified the ideal cut-off value through the analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve). We used Logistic regression, Cox regression, Log-rank test, and Kaplan-Meier method to analyze the association between NLR and patients' disease control rate (DCR) and PFS or OS.

Results: The ideal threshold value for NLR was 2.826. NLR was identified as a significant independent predictor of DCR (OR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.05-0.48, p = 0.001), indicating that a higher NLR is associated with worse DCR. NLR (AUC = 0.634) showed superior predictive capability for DCR in comparison to lymphocytes (AUC = 0.602) and neutrophils (AUC = 0.593). High NLR values were risk factors both for poor PFS (HR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.58-4.06, p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 3.89, 95% CI = 2.09-7.24, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Elevated NLR is strongly associated with lower response to treatment and reduced survival rates in patients with R/M NPC being treated with PD-L1 inhibitors. Patients with high NLR values have poor efficacy and survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
278
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.
期刊最新文献
Front Cover Issue Information Factors Increasing the Likelihood of Postoperative Hematomas Following Thyroid Surgery. Genomic Differences in Thyroid Cancers From Primary Sites Versus Distant Metastases in Individual Patients: A Clinical Perspective and Preliminary Report. Global Incidence, Mortality, and Risk Factors of Stroke in Multi-Modality Head and Neck Cancer Treatment-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1