Improving building extraction from high-resolution aerial images: Error correction and performance enhancement using deep learning on the Inria dataset.

IF 2.6 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Science Progress Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/00368504251318202
Serdar Ekiz, Ugur Acar
{"title":"Improving building extraction from high-resolution aerial images: Error correction and performance enhancement using deep learning on the Inria dataset.","authors":"Serdar Ekiz, Ugur Acar","doi":"10.1177/00368504251318202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracting buildings from images is crucial for urban management, urban planning, and post-disaster change detection. Over the years, various approaches have been tried, but the recent application of deep learning has greatly improved the success of such studies. In this study, the Inria dataset was used, consisting of 180 high-resolution aerial images.The study compared the performance of various architectures. DeepLabv3+ emerged as the most successful, with Accuracy, IoU, and F1 Scores of 96.77%, 89.85%, and 94.53%, respectively. Attention U-Net followed, scoring 95.31%, 85.49%, and 91.95%. U-Net, tested with different encoders, achieved average results of 97.22%, 84.78%, and 90.79%. SE-ResNeXt-50 was the best-performing encoder, followed by SE-ResNet-50, ResNeXt-50, and ResNet-50. UNet++ achieved 94.48% Accuracy, 83.09% IoU, and 90.45% F1 Score, while U2Net obtained 94.09%, 82.26%, and 89.88%, making them less successful.When examining the models under challenging conditions, SE-ResNeXt-50 was the most robust, successfully handling scenarios like occlusion by trees and complex indoor gardens. Conversely, Attention U-Net and UNet++ were more prone to errors, particularly when vehicles were parked near buildings or in the presence of shipping containers, where false positives were common. ResNet-50 struggled with concrete gardens, while U2Net showed better results in scenarios involving indoor gardens.These results, compared to other studies using the same dataset with different pixel sizes, show that eliminating erroneous data and resizing images can enhance the performance of deep learning networks. Therefore, by refining the data and adjusting the image sizes, models can make more accurate and efficient building detections.</p>","PeriodicalId":56061,"journal":{"name":"Science Progress","volume":"108 1","pages":"368504251318202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Progress","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504251318202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracting buildings from images is crucial for urban management, urban planning, and post-disaster change detection. Over the years, various approaches have been tried, but the recent application of deep learning has greatly improved the success of such studies. In this study, the Inria dataset was used, consisting of 180 high-resolution aerial images.The study compared the performance of various architectures. DeepLabv3+ emerged as the most successful, with Accuracy, IoU, and F1 Scores of 96.77%, 89.85%, and 94.53%, respectively. Attention U-Net followed, scoring 95.31%, 85.49%, and 91.95%. U-Net, tested with different encoders, achieved average results of 97.22%, 84.78%, and 90.79%. SE-ResNeXt-50 was the best-performing encoder, followed by SE-ResNet-50, ResNeXt-50, and ResNet-50. UNet++ achieved 94.48% Accuracy, 83.09% IoU, and 90.45% F1 Score, while U2Net obtained 94.09%, 82.26%, and 89.88%, making them less successful.When examining the models under challenging conditions, SE-ResNeXt-50 was the most robust, successfully handling scenarios like occlusion by trees and complex indoor gardens. Conversely, Attention U-Net and UNet++ were more prone to errors, particularly when vehicles were parked near buildings or in the presence of shipping containers, where false positives were common. ResNet-50 struggled with concrete gardens, while U2Net showed better results in scenarios involving indoor gardens.These results, compared to other studies using the same dataset with different pixel sizes, show that eliminating erroneous data and resizing images can enhance the performance of deep learning networks. Therefore, by refining the data and adjusting the image sizes, models can make more accurate and efficient building detections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science Progress
Science Progress Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: Science Progress has for over 100 years been a highly regarded review publication in science, technology and medicine. Its objective is to excite the readers'' interest in areas with which they may not be fully familiar but which could facilitate their interest, or even activity, in a cognate field.
期刊最新文献
Noninvasive prediction of coronary artery disease severity: Comparative analysis of electrocardiographic findings and risk factors with SYNTAX and Gensini score. Peak serum lactate as a robust predictor of imminent death in life-sustaining treatment decisions: A study of 73,927 patients. Remarkable results of energy consumption and CO2 emissions for gasoline and electric powered vehicle. Advantages of the standardized use of preoperative fascia iliaca block versus conventional analgesia in older adults with fragility hip fracture: A retrospective cohort study at two hospitals in Colombia. Lurker: Backdoor attack-based explainable rumor detection on online media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1