Improving building extraction from high-resolution aerial images: Error correction and performance enhancement using deep learning on the Inria dataset.

IF 2.9 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Science Progress Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/00368504251318202
Serdar Ekiz, Ugur Acar
{"title":"Improving building extraction from high-resolution aerial images: Error correction and performance enhancement using deep learning on the Inria dataset.","authors":"Serdar Ekiz, Ugur Acar","doi":"10.1177/00368504251318202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracting buildings from images is crucial for urban management, urban planning, and post-disaster change detection. Over the years, various approaches have been tried, but the recent application of deep learning has greatly improved the success of such studies. In this study, the Inria dataset was used, consisting of 180 high-resolution aerial images.The study compared the performance of various architectures. DeepLabv3+ emerged as the most successful, with Accuracy, IoU, and F1 Scores of 96.77%, 89.85%, and 94.53%, respectively. Attention U-Net followed, scoring 95.31%, 85.49%, and 91.95%. U-Net, tested with different encoders, achieved average results of 97.22%, 84.78%, and 90.79%. SE-ResNeXt-50 was the best-performing encoder, followed by SE-ResNet-50, ResNeXt-50, and ResNet-50. UNet++ achieved 94.48% Accuracy, 83.09% IoU, and 90.45% F1 Score, while U2Net obtained 94.09%, 82.26%, and 89.88%, making them less successful.When examining the models under challenging conditions, SE-ResNeXt-50 was the most robust, successfully handling scenarios like occlusion by trees and complex indoor gardens. Conversely, Attention U-Net and UNet++ were more prone to errors, particularly when vehicles were parked near buildings or in the presence of shipping containers, where false positives were common. ResNet-50 struggled with concrete gardens, while U2Net showed better results in scenarios involving indoor gardens.These results, compared to other studies using the same dataset with different pixel sizes, show that eliminating erroneous data and resizing images can enhance the performance of deep learning networks. Therefore, by refining the data and adjusting the image sizes, models can make more accurate and efficient building detections.</p>","PeriodicalId":56061,"journal":{"name":"Science Progress","volume":"108 1","pages":"368504251318202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Progress","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504251318202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracting buildings from images is crucial for urban management, urban planning, and post-disaster change detection. Over the years, various approaches have been tried, but the recent application of deep learning has greatly improved the success of such studies. In this study, the Inria dataset was used, consisting of 180 high-resolution aerial images.The study compared the performance of various architectures. DeepLabv3+ emerged as the most successful, with Accuracy, IoU, and F1 Scores of 96.77%, 89.85%, and 94.53%, respectively. Attention U-Net followed, scoring 95.31%, 85.49%, and 91.95%. U-Net, tested with different encoders, achieved average results of 97.22%, 84.78%, and 90.79%. SE-ResNeXt-50 was the best-performing encoder, followed by SE-ResNet-50, ResNeXt-50, and ResNet-50. UNet++ achieved 94.48% Accuracy, 83.09% IoU, and 90.45% F1 Score, while U2Net obtained 94.09%, 82.26%, and 89.88%, making them less successful.When examining the models under challenging conditions, SE-ResNeXt-50 was the most robust, successfully handling scenarios like occlusion by trees and complex indoor gardens. Conversely, Attention U-Net and UNet++ were more prone to errors, particularly when vehicles were parked near buildings or in the presence of shipping containers, where false positives were common. ResNet-50 struggled with concrete gardens, while U2Net showed better results in scenarios involving indoor gardens.These results, compared to other studies using the same dataset with different pixel sizes, show that eliminating erroneous data and resizing images can enhance the performance of deep learning networks. Therefore, by refining the data and adjusting the image sizes, models can make more accurate and efficient building detections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从高分辨率航空图像中改进建筑物提取:在Inria数据集上使用深度学习进行错误纠正和性能增强。
从图像中提取建筑物对于城市管理、城市规划和灾后变化检测至关重要。多年来,人们尝试了各种方法,但最近深度学习的应用大大提高了此类研究的成功率。在本研究中,使用Inria数据集,由180张高分辨率航空图像组成。该研究比较了不同架构的性能。DeepLabv3+最为成功,准确率为96.77%,IoU为89.85%,F1评分为94.53%。注意力U-Net紧随其后,得分分别为95.31%、85.49%和91.95%。使用不同编码器对U-Net进行测试,平均结果分别为97.22%、84.78%和90.79%。SE-ResNeXt-50是性能最好的编码器,其次是SE-ResNet-50、ResNeXt-50和ResNet-50。unnet++的准确率为94.48%,IoU为83.09%,F1 Score为90.45%,而U2Net的准确率为94.09%,IoU为82.26%,F1 Score为89.88%,两者的成功率较低。在具有挑战性的条件下检查模型时,SE-ResNeXt-50是最强大的,成功地处理了树木遮挡和复杂室内花园等场景。相反,注意U-Net和unet++更容易出错,特别是当车辆停在建筑物附近或海运集装箱存在时,误报很常见。ResNet-50在混凝土花园方面表现不佳,而U2Net在室内花园方面表现较好。这些结果与使用不同像素大小的相同数据集的其他研究相比,表明消除错误数据和调整图像大小可以提高深度学习网络的性能。因此,通过细化数据和调整图像大小,模型可以更准确、更高效地进行建筑检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science Progress
Science Progress Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: Science Progress has for over 100 years been a highly regarded review publication in science, technology and medicine. Its objective is to excite the readers'' interest in areas with which they may not be fully familiar but which could facilitate their interest, or even activity, in a cognate field.
期刊最新文献
The role of circRNAs in N6-methyladenosine(m6A), cell death and clinical applications in human breast cancer. Machine learning-based DNA microarray analysis for disease detection using the MICRO-AI framework. Endovascular repair of persistent sciatic artery aneurysm: A case report and imaging diagnosis insights. Comparison of survival and establishment of prognostic models for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx at different sites: A retrospective study based on the SEER database. Effects of seed packaging, storage conditions, and durations on seed quality of open-pollinated maize (Zea mays L.) varieties in Ethiopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1