Comparative metabolomic in-depth exploration of red raspberry: new insights into changes in phytochemicals between different breeds.

IF 2.7 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analytical Methods Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1039/d4ay01988a
Yihao Wang, Xiaoou Han, Jiaqing Wang, Hongling Wang, Rong Yan, Na Yu
{"title":"Comparative metabolomic in-depth exploration of red raspberry: new insights into changes in phytochemicals between different breeds.","authors":"Yihao Wang, Xiaoou Han, Jiaqing Wang, Hongling Wang, Rong Yan, Na Yu","doi":"10.1039/d4ay01988a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on a non-targeted metabolomic approach, a comprehensive analysis of the metabolic profiles of two raspberry cultivars, Selina (TSM) and Tulameen (CSM), was conducted to explore the potential for further processing of these two varieties. A total of 752 metabolites were identified in both raspberry varieties, with 375 metabolites detected in negative ion mode and additional metabolites identified in positive ion mode. The total number of differential metabolites between TSM and CSM was 62, with orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) revealing that the main differential metabolites between the two varieties were phenolic compounds, organic acids, and alkaloids. KEGG pathway analysis identified the top three significantly different metabolic pathways as biosynthesis of amino acids; valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis; and alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism. In conclusion, this study comprehensively analyzed the metabolic characteristics of TSM and CSM raspberry varieties, providing valuable insights and revealing their potential application prospects. Compared to previous studies, this research provides new insights into the metabolic differences between TSM and CSM cultivars, specifically highlighting newly identified metabolites that were not reported before. These findings include novel differences in phenolic compounds and alkaloids, which play important roles in plant stress response and have potential health benefits. This enhances our understanding of the unique properties of each cultivar and underscores the biological functions of the newly identified metabolites, contributing to the broader field of functional food development.</p>","PeriodicalId":64,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ay01988a","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on a non-targeted metabolomic approach, a comprehensive analysis of the metabolic profiles of two raspberry cultivars, Selina (TSM) and Tulameen (CSM), was conducted to explore the potential for further processing of these two varieties. A total of 752 metabolites were identified in both raspberry varieties, with 375 metabolites detected in negative ion mode and additional metabolites identified in positive ion mode. The total number of differential metabolites between TSM and CSM was 62, with orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) revealing that the main differential metabolites between the two varieties were phenolic compounds, organic acids, and alkaloids. KEGG pathway analysis identified the top three significantly different metabolic pathways as biosynthesis of amino acids; valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis; and alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism. In conclusion, this study comprehensively analyzed the metabolic characteristics of TSM and CSM raspberry varieties, providing valuable insights and revealing their potential application prospects. Compared to previous studies, this research provides new insights into the metabolic differences between TSM and CSM cultivars, specifically highlighting newly identified metabolites that were not reported before. These findings include novel differences in phenolic compounds and alkaloids, which play important roles in plant stress response and have potential health benefits. This enhances our understanding of the unique properties of each cultivar and underscores the biological functions of the newly identified metabolites, contributing to the broader field of functional food development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于非靶向代谢组学方法,对两个树莓栽培品种 Selina(TSM)和 Tulameen(CSM)的代谢谱进行了全面分析,以探索这两个品种的深加工潜力。在这两个树莓品种中共鉴定出 752 种代谢物,其中 375 种代谢物是在负离子模式下检测到的,其他代谢物是在正离子模式下鉴定到的。正交偏最小二乘判别分析(OPLS-DA)显示,TSM 和 CSM 之间的差异代谢物总数为 62 个,两个品种之间的主要差异代谢物为酚类化合物、有机酸和生物碱。KEGG 通路分析表明,差异显著的前三个代谢通路分别是氨基酸的生物合成;缬氨酸、亮氨酸和异亮氨酸的生物合成;丙氨酸、天门冬氨酸和谷氨酸的代谢。总之,本研究全面分析了 TSM 和 CSM 树莓品种的代谢特征,提供了有价值的见解,并揭示了其潜在的应用前景。与以前的研究相比,本研究对 TSM 和 CSM 树莓品种之间的代谢差异提供了新的见解,特别是强调了以前未报道过的新发现的代谢物。这些发现包括酚类化合物和生物碱的新差异,它们在植物应激反应中发挥着重要作用,并具有潜在的健康益处。这加深了我们对每种栽培品种独特特性的了解,并强调了新发现代谢物的生物功能,为更广泛的功能食品开发领域做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical Methods
Analytical Methods CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
569
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Early applied demonstrations of new analytical methods with clear societal impact
期刊最新文献
An economical fluorescent method for microplastic detection in soil samples. Elastic scattering spectrum fused with Raman spectrum for rapid classification of colorectal cancer tissues. Preconcentration-enhanced electrochemical detection of paraoxon in food and environmental samples using reduced graphene oxide-modified disposable sensors. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the changes in the chemical composition of frankincense before and after stir-frying using GC-MS and LC-MS. Recent advances in development of glucose nanosensors for cellular analysis and other applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1