Does a changing donor pool explain the recent rise in the United States kidney nonuse rate?

IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ajt.2025.02.004
Keighly Bradbrook , David Klassen , Allan B. Massie , Darren E. Stewart
{"title":"Does a changing donor pool explain the recent rise in the United States kidney nonuse rate?","authors":"Keighly Bradbrook ,&nbsp;David Klassen ,&nbsp;Allan B. Massie ,&nbsp;Darren E. Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The proportion of deceased donor kidneys recovered for transplantation that are not transplanted reached 28% in 2023. Past research demonstrated that &gt;90% of the nonuse rate (NUR) increase in the 2000s could be explained by the broadening donor pool. We used the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data to study kidneys recovered from 2010-2023, applying causal inference methods to assess the degree to which the recent, sharp rise in the NUR could be explained by changes in donor clinical characteristics. Unadjusted odds of kidney nonuse were 63% higher (95% CI: 56%, 70%) in 2023 vs 2018. After adjusting for donor factors, the odds of nonuse were only 12% (9%, 15%) higher in 2023. Both regression and propensity weighting demonstrated that 75% to 80% of the recent NUR increase can be explained by a rapidly expanding donor pool. Encouragingly, the NUR has not increased and remains low for above-average quality kidneys. However, the unexplained risk of nonuse for kidneys in the highest kidney donor risk index quartile increased by ∼ 30%, potentially due to residual confounding and/or system-level, exogenous factors such as allocation policy changes. To improve placement efficiency, allocation policy should adapt to the increasingly heterogeneous donor pool by allocating kidneys differently along the donor quality spectrum.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":"25 8","pages":"Pages 1685-1695"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613525000802","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proportion of deceased donor kidneys recovered for transplantation that are not transplanted reached 28% in 2023. Past research demonstrated that >90% of the nonuse rate (NUR) increase in the 2000s could be explained by the broadening donor pool. We used the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data to study kidneys recovered from 2010-2023, applying causal inference methods to assess the degree to which the recent, sharp rise in the NUR could be explained by changes in donor clinical characteristics. Unadjusted odds of kidney nonuse were 63% higher (95% CI: 56%, 70%) in 2023 vs 2018. After adjusting for donor factors, the odds of nonuse were only 12% (9%, 15%) higher in 2023. Both regression and propensity weighting demonstrated that 75% to 80% of the recent NUR increase can be explained by a rapidly expanding donor pool. Encouragingly, the NUR has not increased and remains low for above-average quality kidneys. However, the unexplained risk of nonuse for kidneys in the highest kidney donor risk index quartile increased by ∼ 30%, potentially due to residual confounding and/or system-level, exogenous factors such as allocation policy changes. To improve placement efficiency, allocation policy should adapt to the increasingly heterogeneous donor pool by allocating kidneys differently along the donor quality spectrum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供体池的变化解释了近期美国肾脏未使用率的上升吗?
2023年,用于移植而未移植的已故供体肾脏的比例达到28%。过去的研究表明,2000年代非使用率的增长中有90%可以用捐助者池的扩大来解释。我们使用OPTN数据来研究2010-2023年恢复的肾脏,应用因果推理方法来评估近期未使用率急剧上升的程度可以通过供体临床特征的变化来解释。与2018年相比,2023年未调整肾脏不使用的几率高出63% (95% CI: 56%, 70%)。在调整供体因素后,2023年不使用的几率仅高出12%(9%,15%)。回归和倾向加权均表明,近期非使用率增加的75-80%可以用迅速扩大的捐赠池来解释。令人鼓舞的是,非使用率没有增加,并且对于高于平均水平的肾脏仍然很低。然而,在最高肾供者风险指数四分位数中,未解释的不使用肾脏的风险增加了约30%,可能是由于残留的混杂和/或系统层面的外源性因素,如分配政策变化。为了提高安置效率,分配政策应适应日益多样化的供体池,根据供体质量谱对肾脏进行不同的分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.
期刊最新文献
Spiroplasma infection complicated by macrophage activation syndrome and fulminant hepatitis in a kidney transplanted patient. Anti-AT1R Autoantibodies in pancreas transplantation Rewriting the rule of alloimmunity: a blueprint for B cell-driven transplant outcomes. Pediatric Cardiac Xenotransplantation: A Cautious Approach as Bridge to Allotransplantation. Occult rat Hepatitis E Virus Infection as a Cause of Cirrhosis and Post-Transplant Recurrence: Insights into the Role of Metagenomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1