Tobacco and household expenditure in Egypt: insights into socioeconomic inequalities and spending profiles from the Household Income, Expenditure and Consumption Survey.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-21676-w
Aya Mostafa, Rasha Saad Hussein
{"title":"Tobacco and household expenditure in Egypt: insights into socioeconomic inequalities and spending profiles from the Household Income, Expenditure and Consumption Survey.","authors":"Aya Mostafa, Rasha Saad Hussein","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-21676-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tobacco use deepens poverty. Egypt, a lower-middle income country, is one of the few countries worldwide where tobacco use is rising. However, no published study examined the adverse impacts of tobacco on the Egyptian household welfare, specifically after the first Egyptian Pound (EGP) devaluation by 80% in 2016. To address this gap and inform tobacco taxation policymaking, we aimed to provide evidence characterizing national household tobacco expenditure in Egypt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of the 2017/2018 Household Income, Expenditure and Consumption Survey, focusing on the most used tobacco products in Egypt: cigarette and waterpipe tobacco. We identified the proportion and background characteristics of cigarette and waterpipe tobacco smoker households. We calculated household tobacco expenditure share as a proportion of total household expenditure. We compared mean household expenditure shares of 12 expenditure groups among smoker and nonsmoker households and examined the differences by income quintiles. We determined the factors associated with household tobacco expenditure. Descriptive, bivariable, and multivariable analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cigarette and waterpipe tobacco smokers were present in 41.1% and 7.0% of 12,845 households, respectively. Annual household expenditure on cigarettes (10.7%) was triple that of waterpipe tobacco (3.4%) (p < 0.001). Smoker households spent less than nonsmoker households on virtually all expenditure groups (p < 0.001). The poorest income quintile spent 11.1% of its total expenditure on tobacco (1.26 times higher than the richest, p = 0.006). More waterpipe tobacco than cigarette smoker households lived below the poverty line (40.6% versus 24.4%, p < 0.001). Cigarette smoker households spent less on food and housing but more on tobacco than waterpipe tobacco smoker households. The poorest cigarette and waterpipe tobacco smoker households spent 7.0-9.7 times as much on tobacco as on education. Common independent factors associated with higher household expenditure on cigarettes and waterpipe tobacco were urban residence (p = 0.011 and p = 0.015, respectively), and lower income (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In 2017/2018, one-tenth of Egyptian smoker household's expenditure was allocated to tobacco, disproportionately concentrated among the poorest. Our results preliminarily indicate that tobacco expenditure is associated with potential compromises of varying extent in almost all other expenditures in smoker households. This baseline profiling of household tobacco expenditure can potentially inform an evidence-based tobacco taxation policy, supporting the reduction of tobacco-associated socioeconomic inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"598"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21676-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tobacco use deepens poverty. Egypt, a lower-middle income country, is one of the few countries worldwide where tobacco use is rising. However, no published study examined the adverse impacts of tobacco on the Egyptian household welfare, specifically after the first Egyptian Pound (EGP) devaluation by 80% in 2016. To address this gap and inform tobacco taxation policymaking, we aimed to provide evidence characterizing national household tobacco expenditure in Egypt.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the 2017/2018 Household Income, Expenditure and Consumption Survey, focusing on the most used tobacco products in Egypt: cigarette and waterpipe tobacco. We identified the proportion and background characteristics of cigarette and waterpipe tobacco smoker households. We calculated household tobacco expenditure share as a proportion of total household expenditure. We compared mean household expenditure shares of 12 expenditure groups among smoker and nonsmoker households and examined the differences by income quintiles. We determined the factors associated with household tobacco expenditure. Descriptive, bivariable, and multivariable analyses were performed.

Results: Cigarette and waterpipe tobacco smokers were present in 41.1% and 7.0% of 12,845 households, respectively. Annual household expenditure on cigarettes (10.7%) was triple that of waterpipe tobacco (3.4%) (p < 0.001). Smoker households spent less than nonsmoker households on virtually all expenditure groups (p < 0.001). The poorest income quintile spent 11.1% of its total expenditure on tobacco (1.26 times higher than the richest, p = 0.006). More waterpipe tobacco than cigarette smoker households lived below the poverty line (40.6% versus 24.4%, p < 0.001). Cigarette smoker households spent less on food and housing but more on tobacco than waterpipe tobacco smoker households. The poorest cigarette and waterpipe tobacco smoker households spent 7.0-9.7 times as much on tobacco as on education. Common independent factors associated with higher household expenditure on cigarettes and waterpipe tobacco were urban residence (p = 0.011 and p = 0.015, respectively), and lower income (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In 2017/2018, one-tenth of Egyptian smoker household's expenditure was allocated to tobacco, disproportionately concentrated among the poorest. Our results preliminarily indicate that tobacco expenditure is associated with potential compromises of varying extent in almost all other expenditures in smoker households. This baseline profiling of household tobacco expenditure can potentially inform an evidence-based tobacco taxation policy, supporting the reduction of tobacco-associated socioeconomic inequalities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃及的烟草和家庭支出:家庭收入、支出和消费调查对社会经济不平等和支出概况的见解。
背景:烟草使用加深了贫困。埃及是一个中低收入国家,是世界上少数几个烟草使用正在上升的国家之一。然而,没有发表的研究调查烟草对埃及家庭福利的不利影响,特别是在2016年埃及镑(EGP)首次贬值80%之后。为了弥补这一差距并为烟草税收政策制定提供信息,我们旨在提供埃及全国家庭烟草支出特征的证据。方法:我们对2017/2018年家庭收入、支出和消费调查进行了二次分析,重点关注埃及最常用的烟草产品:卷烟和水烟。我们确定了卷烟和水烟吸烟者家庭的比例和背景特征。我们计算了家庭烟草支出占家庭总支出的比例。我们比较了吸烟和不吸烟家庭的12个支出组的平均家庭支出份额,并检查了收入五分位数的差异。我们确定了与家庭烟草支出相关的因素。进行了描述性、双变量和多变量分析。结果:12845户家庭中,卷烟吸烟者占41.1%,水烟吸烟者占7.0%。家庭年度卷烟支出(10.7%)是水烟支出(3.4%)的三倍(p结论:2017/2018年,埃及吸烟者家庭支出的十分之一用于烟草,不成比例地集中在最贫穷的人群中。我们的研究结果初步表明,在几乎所有吸烟家庭的其他支出中,烟草支出与潜在的妥协有不同程度的关联。这种家庭烟草支出的基线概况可能为基于证据的烟草税收政策提供信息,支持减少与烟草相关的社会经济不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Beyond the surface: a collaborative effort for free skin cancer screenings in an underserved community. HOme-based self-sampling for cervical cancer prevention education among women living with HIV in Ghana (HOPE-inG): study protocol for a cluster-randomized type 2 hybrid effectiveness implementation trial. Comparison of the health-related outcomes for traditional cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heat-not-burn cigarettes and snus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HIV testing factors among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: an analysis based on Lasso regression and Bayesian networks. Enhancing identification of suspected unregulated drug toxicity deaths in administrative health records: a case study among people with HIV in British Columbia, Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1