Endoscopic semi-blunt dissection technique is safe and effective for treating gastric submucosal tumors from the muscularis propria.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY BMC Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1186/s12876-025-03669-6
Liming Zhang, Rui Zhao, Junxuan Zhang
{"title":"Endoscopic semi-blunt dissection technique is safe and effective for treating gastric submucosal tumors from the muscularis propria.","authors":"Liming Zhang, Rui Zhao, Junxuan Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03669-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Needle knives are the most commonly used instrument during endoscopic treatment for gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). The conventional resection method involves fully extending the needle-shaped knife head, which allows it to more easily penetrate the muscularis propria while stripping the muscle layer of the tumor. We propose a semi-blunt dissection method that can effectively reduce damage to the muscularis propria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 113 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of gastric SMTs originating from the muscularis propria were retrospectively analyzed. The conventional method consisted of 73 patients; The other group consisted of 40 patients underwent the semi-blunt dissection method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, sex, or lesion location. The intraoperative operational variable, the maximum diameter of gastric muscularis propria damage, was significantly greater in conventional method group than the other group (1.06 ± 0.48 cm vs. 0.46 ± 0.09 cm, p < 0.001). There was also no significant difference between the two groups in terms of histological diagnosis, postoperative complications and the percentage of histologically positive resection margins.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The semi-blunt dissection method has certain advantages in the endoscopic resection of gastric tumors originating from the muscularis propria, including a small extent of gastric muscularis propria damage and a shorter postoperative hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03669-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Needle knives are the most commonly used instrument during endoscopic treatment for gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). The conventional resection method involves fully extending the needle-shaped knife head, which allows it to more easily penetrate the muscularis propria while stripping the muscle layer of the tumor. We propose a semi-blunt dissection method that can effectively reduce damage to the muscularis propria.

Methods: A total of 113 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of gastric SMTs originating from the muscularis propria were retrospectively analyzed. The conventional method consisted of 73 patients; The other group consisted of 40 patients underwent the semi-blunt dissection method.

Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, sex, or lesion location. The intraoperative operational variable, the maximum diameter of gastric muscularis propria damage, was significantly greater in conventional method group than the other group (1.06 ± 0.48 cm vs. 0.46 ± 0.09 cm, p < 0.001). There was also no significant difference between the two groups in terms of histological diagnosis, postoperative complications and the percentage of histologically positive resection margins.

Conclusion: The semi-blunt dissection method has certain advantages in the endoscopic resection of gastric tumors originating from the muscularis propria, including a small extent of gastric muscularis propria damage and a shorter postoperative hospital stay.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜下半钝性剥离技术从固有肌层出发治疗胃粘膜下肿瘤安全有效。
背景:在胃粘膜下肿瘤的内镜治疗中,针刀是最常用的器械。传统的切除方法包括将针状刀头完全延伸,这使得它更容易穿透固有肌层,同时剥离肿瘤的肌肉层。我们提出一种半钝性解剖方法,可以有效地减少对固有肌层的损伤。方法:回顾性分析113例经内镜切除胃固有肌层的smt患者的资料。常规方法73例;另一组40例采用半钝性剥离法。结果:两组患者在年龄、性别、病变部位上无明显差异。术中操作变量胃固有肌层损伤最大直径常规组明显大于常规组(1.06±0.48 cm vs. 0.46±0.09 cm)。结论:半钝性剥离法在内镜下切除胃固有肌层肿瘤具有一定的优势,胃固有肌层损伤程度小,术后住院时间短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Remote Self-help cognitive-behavioural Therapy for irritable bowel syndrome (ReSeT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Systemic hematologic, metabolic, and inflammatory dysregulation in liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic utility of novel indices in an Egyptian cohort. Correction: Volume-outcome relationship in anatomical and non-anatomical liver resections: a rapid systematic review. Application of transjugular liver biopsy in pediatric living donor liver transplantation. GCKR genetic variants and circulating FGF21 identify a metabolic risk signature in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1