Differences in tumor angiogenesis and related factors between lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as pure ground glass opacity and solid nodules.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Discover. Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1007/s12672-025-01898-5
Rirong Qu, Yang Zhang, Shenghui Qin, Jing Xiong, Xiangning Fu, Lequn Li, Dehao Tu, Yixin Cai
{"title":"Differences in tumor angiogenesis and related factors between lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as pure ground glass opacity and solid nodules.","authors":"Rirong Qu, Yang Zhang, Shenghui Qin, Jing Xiong, Xiangning Fu, Lequn Li, Dehao Tu, Yixin Cai","doi":"10.1007/s12672-025-01898-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prognosis of ground glass opacity featured lung adenocarcinomas (GGO-LUAD) is significantly better than that of solid nodule featured lung adenocarcinomas (SN-LUAD), but the specific reasons behind their indolent tumor behavior are still unclear. The purpose of this study is to investigate their differences in intratumoral microvessels, related angiogenic factors and important stromal cells.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients (15 paired patients only with GGO or SN) diagnosed with pathological stage 0-I lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical treatment were included into this study. Immunohistochemistry was performed to stain the blood vessel markers (CD31, CD34 and CD105), LYVE-1, the cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) markers (α-SMA and S100A4), TGF-β and HIF-1α from 30 patients tissue sections. At the same time, Ki67 Labeling Index (LI) extracted from pathological report of all patients was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GGO-LUAD is more abundant than SN-LUAD in lymphatic vessel density (LVD), but similar in total microvessel density (CD31 + MVD). However, GGO-LUAD is significantly lower than SN-LUAD in CD34 + MVD and CD105 + MVD. In terms of TGF-β, HIF-1α expression and Ki67 LI level, GGO-LUAD was also significantly weaker than SN-LUAD. Moreover, the distribution of CAFs in GGO-LUAD is less than that in SN-LUAD. Regardless of the pathological type (adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) or invasive lung adenocarcinoma (IAC)), there is no difference in any of the above indicators in GGO-LUAD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our finding displays that GGO-LUAD was significantly lower than SN-LUAD in CD34 + MVD and CD105 + MVD reflecting tumor angiogenesis, and the distribution of CAFs and factors related to tumor angiogenesis were also significantly lower in GGO-LUAD, which may indicate that the weak ability of angiogenesis might be the reason for the good prognosis of GGO-LUAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11148,"journal":{"name":"Discover. Oncology","volume":"16 1","pages":"180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover. Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-025-01898-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The prognosis of ground glass opacity featured lung adenocarcinomas (GGO-LUAD) is significantly better than that of solid nodule featured lung adenocarcinomas (SN-LUAD), but the specific reasons behind their indolent tumor behavior are still unclear. The purpose of this study is to investigate their differences in intratumoral microvessels, related angiogenic factors and important stromal cells.

Methods: Thirty patients (15 paired patients only with GGO or SN) diagnosed with pathological stage 0-I lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical treatment were included into this study. Immunohistochemistry was performed to stain the blood vessel markers (CD31, CD34 and CD105), LYVE-1, the cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) markers (α-SMA and S100A4), TGF-β and HIF-1α from 30 patients tissue sections. At the same time, Ki67 Labeling Index (LI) extracted from pathological report of all patients was also analyzed.

Results: GGO-LUAD is more abundant than SN-LUAD in lymphatic vessel density (LVD), but similar in total microvessel density (CD31 + MVD). However, GGO-LUAD is significantly lower than SN-LUAD in CD34 + MVD and CD105 + MVD. In terms of TGF-β, HIF-1α expression and Ki67 LI level, GGO-LUAD was also significantly weaker than SN-LUAD. Moreover, the distribution of CAFs in GGO-LUAD is less than that in SN-LUAD. Regardless of the pathological type (adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) or invasive lung adenocarcinoma (IAC)), there is no difference in any of the above indicators in GGO-LUAD.

Conclusions: Our finding displays that GGO-LUAD was significantly lower than SN-LUAD in CD34 + MVD and CD105 + MVD reflecting tumor angiogenesis, and the distribution of CAFs and factors related to tumor angiogenesis were also significantly lower in GGO-LUAD, which may indicate that the weak ability of angiogenesis might be the reason for the good prognosis of GGO-LUAD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以纯磨玻璃样混浊和实性结节表现的肺腺癌肿瘤血管生成及相关因素的差异。
前言:磨玻璃混浊特征肺腺癌(go - luad)的预后明显好于实性结节特征肺腺癌(SN-LUAD),但其惰性肿瘤行为背后的具体原因尚不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨它们在肿瘤内微血管、相关血管生成因子和重要基质细胞方面的差异。方法:30例病理诊断为0-I期肺腺癌并行手术治疗的患者(其中仅GGO或SN配对患者15例)。采用免疫组化染色30例患者组织切片的血管标志物(CD31、CD34和CD105)、LYVE-1、癌相关成纤维细胞(CAFs)标志物(α-SMA和S100A4)、TGF-β和HIF-1α。同时对所有患者病理报告中提取的Ki67标记指数(LI)进行分析。结果:在淋巴管密度(LVD)上,GGO-LUAD比SN-LUAD含量高,但在总微血管密度(CD31 + MVD)上差异不大。而CD34 + MVD和CD105 + MVD中,GGO-LUAD明显低于SN-LUAD。在TGF-β、HIF-1α表达和Ki67 LI水平上,GGO-LUAD也明显弱于SN-LUAD。此外,在go - luad中,CAFs的分布比SN-LUAD中要少。无论病理类型(原位腺癌(AIS)或微创腺癌(MIA)或浸润性肺腺癌(IAC)),上述各项指标在go - luad中均无差异。结论:我们的研究结果显示,反映肿瘤血管生成的CD34 + MVD和CD105 + MVD中,go - luad明显低于cn - luad,并且在go - luad中,CAFs分布及肿瘤血管生成相关因子也明显降低,这可能提示血管生成能力弱可能是go - luad预后较好的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Discover. Oncology
Discover. Oncology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
122
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cost effectiveness analysis of PEG-rhG-CSF versus rhG-CSF for primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy induced neutropenia in Chinese patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma using real world data. Multidimensional single-cell analysis of the molecular characteristics and functional pathways of Regulatory T cells in the microenvironment of HR+ breast cancer. Crosstalk between circRNAs and the MAPK signaling pathway in cancer progression. A PIK3CA and NF1 expression-based prognostic signature derived from Mendelian randomization identifies causal immune-regulatory determinants of glioblastoma outcomes. Comprehensive pan-cancer analysis of FSCN1 as a marker for prognosis and immunity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1