Outcomes after radical endoscopic resection of high risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma: an international multicenter retrospective cohort study.

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1055/a-2538-9316
Man Wai Chan, Rehan Haidry, Benjamin Norton, Massimiliano di Pietro, Andreas V Hadjinicolaou, Maximilien Barret, Paul Doumbe Mandengue, Stefan Seewald, Raf Bisschops, Philippe Nafteux, Michael J Bourke, Sunil Gupta, Pradeep Mundre, Arnaud Lemmers, Clémence Vuckovic, Oliver Pech, Philippe Leclercq, Emmanuel Coron, Sybren L Meijer, Jacques J G H M Bergman, Roos E Pouw
{"title":"Outcomes after radical endoscopic resection of high risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma: an international multicenter retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Man Wai Chan, Rehan Haidry, Benjamin Norton, Massimiliano di Pietro, Andreas V Hadjinicolaou, Maximilien Barret, Paul Doumbe Mandengue, Stefan Seewald, Raf Bisschops, Philippe Nafteux, Michael J Bourke, Sunil Gupta, Pradeep Mundre, Arnaud Lemmers, Clémence Vuckovic, Oliver Pech, Philippe Leclercq, Emmanuel Coron, Sybren L Meijer, Jacques J G H M Bergman, Roos E Pouw","doi":"10.1055/a-2538-9316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-endoscopic resection (ER) management of high risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is debated, with conflicting reports on lymph node metastasis (LNM). We aimed to assess outcomes following radical ER for high risk T1 EAC.We identified patients who underwent radical ER (tumor-negative deep margin) of high risk T1 EAC, followed by surgery or endoscopic surveillance, between 2008 and 2019 across 11 international centers.106 patients (86 men; mean [SD] age, 70 [11] years) were included. Of these, 26 (age, 64 [11] years) underwent additional surgery, with residual T1 EAC found in five patients (19%) and LNM in two (8%). After a median [IQR] follow-up of 47 [32-79] months, 2/26 patients (8%) developed LNM/distant metastasis, with one EAC-related death (4%), one unrelated death (4%), and four patients lost to follow-up (15%). Of the 80 patients (age, 71 [9] years) who entered endoscopic surveillance, 5/80 (6%) developed LNM/distant metastasis, with four EAC-related deaths (5%) over 46 (IQR 25-59) months follow-up; there were 15 unrelated deaths (19%), and 10 patients lost to follow-up (13%). The overall rates (95%CI) were: LNM, 6% (2%-12%); LNM/distant metastasis, 7% (3%-13%); EAC-related mortality, 5% (2%-11%); overall mortality, 20% (95%CI 13-29).Our findings present low rates of LNM after radical ER of high risk T1 EAC, consistent with other endoscopy-focused studies. Post-surgical patients are still at risk for metastasis and disease-specific mortality. These results suggest that endoscopic surveillance is suitable for selected cases, but further prospective studies are needed to refine patient selection and confirm optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11516,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":"699-708"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2538-9316","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-endoscopic resection (ER) management of high risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is debated, with conflicting reports on lymph node metastasis (LNM). We aimed to assess outcomes following radical ER for high risk T1 EAC.We identified patients who underwent radical ER (tumor-negative deep margin) of high risk T1 EAC, followed by surgery or endoscopic surveillance, between 2008 and 2019 across 11 international centers.106 patients (86 men; mean [SD] age, 70 [11] years) were included. Of these, 26 (age, 64 [11] years) underwent additional surgery, with residual T1 EAC found in five patients (19%) and LNM in two (8%). After a median [IQR] follow-up of 47 [32-79] months, 2/26 patients (8%) developed LNM/distant metastasis, with one EAC-related death (4%), one unrelated death (4%), and four patients lost to follow-up (15%). Of the 80 patients (age, 71 [9] years) who entered endoscopic surveillance, 5/80 (6%) developed LNM/distant metastasis, with four EAC-related deaths (5%) over 46 (IQR 25-59) months follow-up; there were 15 unrelated deaths (19%), and 10 patients lost to follow-up (13%). The overall rates (95%CI) were: LNM, 6% (2%-12%); LNM/distant metastasis, 7% (3%-13%); EAC-related mortality, 5% (2%-11%); overall mortality, 20% (95%CI 13-29).Our findings present low rates of LNM after radical ER of high risk T1 EAC, consistent with other endoscopy-focused studies. Post-surgical patients are still at risk for metastasis and disease-specific mortality. These results suggest that endoscopic surveillance is suitable for selected cases, but further prospective studies are needed to refine patient selection and confirm optimal outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜下根治性切除高危T1型食管腺癌后的预后:一项国际多中心回顾性队列研究
高风险T1期食管腺癌(EAC)内镜切除(ER)后的治疗存在争议,淋巴结转移(LNM)的报道相互矛盾。我们旨在评估根治性ER治疗高风险T1期食管腺癌(EAC)的结果。方法:在2008年至2019年期间,我们在11个国际中心确定了接受根治性ER(肿瘤阴性深缘)的高风险T1型EAC患者,随后进行手术或内窥镜监测。结果共纳入106例患者,男性86例,年龄70±11岁。其中,26例(64±11年)患者接受了额外的手术,5例(19%)患者存在T1 EAC残留,2例(8%)患者存在LNM。中位随访47个月(IQR 32-79)后,2/26(8%)发生LNM/远处转移(DM), 1(4%)发生eac相关死亡。无相关性死亡1/26(4%),失访4/26(15%)。80例患者(71±9岁)进入内镜监测。在46个月(IQR 25-59)个月的随访中,5/80(6%)发生LNM/DM, 4/80(5%)发生eac相关死亡。有15/80(19%)例非相关死亡,10/80(13%)例随访丢失。随访期间,LNM的总死亡率为6% (95% CI 2-12), LNM/DM的总死亡率为7% (95% CI 3-13), eac相关死亡率为5% (95% CI 2-11),总死亡率为20% (95% CI 13-29)。结论:我们的研究结果显示高危T1型EAC根治性ER后LNM发生率较低,与其他以内镜为重点的研究结果一致。术后患者仍有转移和疾病特异性死亡的风险。这些结果表明内镜监测适用于选定的病例,但需要进一步的前瞻性研究来完善患者选择并确认最佳结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy
Endoscopy 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
1401
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Endoscopy is a leading journal covering the latest technologies and global advancements in gastrointestinal endoscopy. With guidance from an international editorial board, it delivers high-quality content catering to the needs of endoscopists, surgeons, clinicians, and researchers worldwide. Publishing 12 issues each year, Endoscopy offers top-quality review articles, original contributions, prospective studies, surveys of diagnostic and therapeutic advances, and comprehensive coverage of key national and international meetings. Additionally, articles often include supplementary online video content.
期刊最新文献
A novel colonoscope with 230-degree extra-wide field-of-view optics: a prospective first-in-human pilot study. A national audit of 1724 post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers: understanding causes and consequences. Water consumption during bowel preparation for colonoscopy before and after a simple infographic-based intervention: a prospective observational study. Colorectal mucosal exposure area assessment using artificial intelligence: a multicenter prospective observational study. Clinical implications of computer-aided real-time size estimation of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy: a prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1