Efficacy of Silicone Gel Versus Placebo for Postsurgical Scars of the Eyelids: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1097/IOP.0000000000002913
Troy S Karanfilian, Tobin Thuma, Tiffany Cheng, Ricky Paramo, Jee-Young Moon, Sruti Akella, Anne Barmettler
{"title":"Efficacy of Silicone Gel Versus Placebo for Postsurgical Scars of the Eyelids: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Study.","authors":"Troy S Karanfilian, Tobin Thuma, Tiffany Cheng, Ricky Paramo, Jee-Young Moon, Sruti Akella, Anne Barmettler","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While silicone has been shown to be effective on scars on the sternum, foot, and other areas with thicker skin, the effect of silicone on scars in the thin periocular skin has not yet been evaluated in a prospective, randomized, and double-blinded fashion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study enrolled patients undergoing bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty or bilateral upper eyelid ptosis repair. Subjects were randomized to apply silicone gel to 1 eyelid incision site and placebo (petrolatum ointment) to the other side twice daily postoperatively. Outcome measures were physician-graded scar erythema, elevation, and pigmentation, as well as patient-reported satisfaction, itching, pain, and firmness. These were assessed postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 192 eyelids from 96 patients, there were no significant ( p ≤ 0.05) differences in any outcomes between silicone gel and placebo across any measure or time point. Patient satisfaction and blinded doctor and patient appearance preferences did not show any significant difference between the 2 treatments at any time point. Average follow-up was 11 weeks (range: 1-136 weeks).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This clinical trial suggests that topical silicone may not offer significant advantages over petrolatum ointment in improving eyelid scar healing. Overall results indicate similar efficacy between treatments. These results underscore the importance of evidence-based medicine in choosing beneficial and cost-effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19588,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"555-559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: While silicone has been shown to be effective on scars on the sternum, foot, and other areas with thicker skin, the effect of silicone on scars in the thin periocular skin has not yet been evaluated in a prospective, randomized, and double-blinded fashion.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study enrolled patients undergoing bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty or bilateral upper eyelid ptosis repair. Subjects were randomized to apply silicone gel to 1 eyelid incision site and placebo (petrolatum ointment) to the other side twice daily postoperatively. Outcome measures were physician-graded scar erythema, elevation, and pigmentation, as well as patient-reported satisfaction, itching, pain, and firmness. These were assessed postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.

Results: Of 192 eyelids from 96 patients, there were no significant ( p ≤ 0.05) differences in any outcomes between silicone gel and placebo across any measure or time point. Patient satisfaction and blinded doctor and patient appearance preferences did not show any significant difference between the 2 treatments at any time point. Average follow-up was 11 weeks (range: 1-136 weeks).

Conclusions: This clinical trial suggests that topical silicone may not offer significant advantages over petrolatum ointment in improving eyelid scar healing. Overall results indicate similar efficacy between treatments. These results underscore the importance of evidence-based medicine in choosing beneficial and cost-effective interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硅胶与安慰剂治疗术后眼睑疤痕的疗效:一项随机、对照、双盲研究。
目的:虽然硅酮已被证明对胸骨、足部和其他皮肤较厚的部位的疤痕有效,但硅酮对薄眼周皮肤疤痕的效果尚未以前瞻性、随机和双盲的方式进行评估。方法:这项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究纳入了接受双侧上睑成形术或双侧上睑下垂修复的患者。受试者随机分为两组,分别在一侧眼睑切口处涂抹硅胶,另一侧眼睑切口处涂抹安慰剂(凡士林软膏),每日两次。结果测量是医生分级的疤痕红斑、隆起和色素沉着,以及患者报告的满意度、瘙痒、疼痛和硬度。分别于术后1周、1个月、3个月和6个月进行评估。结果:在96例患者的192个眼睑中,硅胶凝胶和安慰剂在任何测量或时间点上的任何结果均无显著差异(p≤0.05)。两种治疗在任何时间点的患者满意度和盲法医生和患者外观偏好均无显著差异。平均随访11周(范围:1-136周)。讨论:这项临床试验表明,在改善眼睑疤痕愈合方面,局部硅胶可能没有凡士林软膏的显著优势。总体结果表明两种治疗方法的疗效相似。这些结果强调了循证医学在选择有益和具有成本效益的干预措施方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery features original articles and reviews on topics such as ptosis, eyelid reconstruction, orbital diagnosis and surgery, lacrimal problems, and eyelid malposition. Update reports on diagnostic techniques, surgical equipment and instrumentation, and medical therapies are included, as well as detailed analyses of recent research findings and their clinical applications.
期刊最新文献
Redefining the Direct Brow Lift: The Key Role of Raising the ROOF. Re: "Horizontal Palpebral Fissure Best Predicts Subjective Facial Asymmetry in Unilateral Anophthalmia/Microphthalmia". Ophthalmic Rosai-Dorfman Disease and the Revised Classification of Histiocytoses: A Case Series and Review of the Literature. Relapse Versus Rebound in Thyroid Eye Disease After Teprotumumab Treatment: A Retrospective Case Series. Double Lacrimal Puncta in a Case of Coffin-Siris Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1