Academic Coaching to Promote Self-Directed Learning in Graduate Medical Education.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09424-7
Kathryn M Burtson, Kelsey R Wilson, Michelle E Kiger, Eulho Jung, Joshua D Hartzell, Holly Meyer
{"title":"Academic Coaching to Promote Self-Directed Learning in Graduate Medical Education.","authors":"Kathryn M Burtson, Kelsey R Wilson, Michelle E Kiger, Eulho Jung, Joshua D Hartzell, Holly Meyer","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09424-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Graduate medical education is a critical period for fostering self-directed learning (SDL). This study introduced an academic coaching program to support SDL among internal medicine (IM) residents, leveraging Gallimore and Tharp's four-stage model as a scaffolding framework.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of academic coaching on residents' performance, including Internal Medicine In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) scores, individualized learning plans (ILPs), and attitudinal changes. The study also explored how coaching influenced SDL within the residency program.</p><p><strong>Design and participants: </strong>A mixed-methods case study was conducted in a mid-sized university's IM residency program. Quantitative measures included pre- and post-coaching surveys, ILP analysis, and IM-ITE score evaluation. Semi-structured interviews provided qualitative insights into participant experiences. Of 77 eligible residents, 40 enrolled in the coaching program, and 27 (18 post-graduate year (PGY) 1 and PGY2) completed at least one session. Baseline IM-ITE scores guided enrollment for mandatory participants.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Of the 77 residents, 51 had complete IM-ITE data and individualized learning plans (ILPs) from 2022 and 2023. Residents attending one coaching session demonstrated significant improvement in IM-ITE percentile scores (p = .022), while those with two or more sessions showed significant gains in both percent correct (p = .015) and percentile scores (p = .003). No significant differences were observed in ILPs or attitudinal surveys. Qualitative analyses of resident participant interviews highlight coaching's positive influence on SDL, organized into input, process, and output domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sustained coaching, defined as two or more coaching meetings, is associated with improved IM-ITE performance. Qualitative findings underscore the program's role in enhancing residents' SDL.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3311-3319"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12586823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09424-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Graduate medical education is a critical period for fostering self-directed learning (SDL). This study introduced an academic coaching program to support SDL among internal medicine (IM) residents, leveraging Gallimore and Tharp's four-stage model as a scaffolding framework.

Objective: To assess the impact of academic coaching on residents' performance, including Internal Medicine In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) scores, individualized learning plans (ILPs), and attitudinal changes. The study also explored how coaching influenced SDL within the residency program.

Design and participants: A mixed-methods case study was conducted in a mid-sized university's IM residency program. Quantitative measures included pre- and post-coaching surveys, ILP analysis, and IM-ITE score evaluation. Semi-structured interviews provided qualitative insights into participant experiences. Of 77 eligible residents, 40 enrolled in the coaching program, and 27 (18 post-graduate year (PGY) 1 and PGY2) completed at least one session. Baseline IM-ITE scores guided enrollment for mandatory participants.

Key results: Of the 77 residents, 51 had complete IM-ITE data and individualized learning plans (ILPs) from 2022 and 2023. Residents attending one coaching session demonstrated significant improvement in IM-ITE percentile scores (p = .022), while those with two or more sessions showed significant gains in both percent correct (p = .015) and percentile scores (p = .003). No significant differences were observed in ILPs or attitudinal surveys. Qualitative analyses of resident participant interviews highlight coaching's positive influence on SDL, organized into input, process, and output domains.

Conclusions: Sustained coaching, defined as two or more coaching meetings, is associated with improved IM-ITE performance. Qualitative findings underscore the program's role in enhancing residents' SDL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术辅导促进研究生医学教育中的自主学习。
背景:医学研究生教育是培养自主学习能力的关键时期。本研究引入了一个学术指导计划,以支持内科(IM)住院医师的SDL,利用Gallimore和Tharp的四阶段模型作为脚手架框架。目的:探讨学术辅导对住院医师内科实习考试(IM-ITE)成绩、个性化学习计划(ILPs)和态度变化的影响。该研究还探讨了在住院医师计划中教练如何影响SDL。设计和参与者:在一所中等规模大学的IM住院医师项目中进行了一个混合方法的案例研究。定量测量包括训练前和训练后的调查、ILP分析和IM-ITE评分评估。半结构化访谈为参与者的经历提供了定性的见解。在77名符合条件的居民中,40人参加了辅导计划,27人(18名研究生(PGY) 1和PGY2)完成了至少一个课程。基线IM-ITE分数指导了强制性参与者的入组。关键结果:在77名居民中,51人拥有完整的IM-ITE数据和2022年至2023年的个性化学习计划(ILPs)。参加一次辅导课程的住院医生在IM-ITE百分位数得分上有显著提高(p = 0.022),而参加两次或两次以上辅导课程的住院医生在正确率(p = 0.015)和百分位数得分(p = 0.003)上都有显著提高。在ilp和态度调查中没有观察到显著差异。对常驻参与者访谈的定性分析突出了教练对SDL的积极影响,分为输入、过程和输出领域。结论:持续的教练,定义为两次或两次以上的教练会议,与IM-ITE表现的改善有关。定性研究结果强调了该计划在提高居民SDL方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Reimagining How We Measure and Address Patient Experience: Toward Nimble, Dynamic, and Meaningful Feedback. "Academia Is a Very Unforgiving Space": A Qualitative Study of Challenges Faced by Under-represented Scholars in Biomedical Research. Preventive Health Services in Reproductive-Aged Women with Diabetes Mellitus: A Scoping Review. Of Hoofbeats, Horses, and Zebras: A "Conversation" with Drs. William Dock, Theodore Woodward, and Alvan Feinstein. Stem-Cell Medicine: Unlimited Possibilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1