The Efficacy and Safety of Adjustable Intragastric Balloon for Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Facts Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1159/000542921
Guowu Sun, Chuqi Xia, Yinuo Wang, Guowu Sun, Wanyang Lei, Daoming Liang
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of Adjustable Intragastric Balloon for Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Guowu Sun, Chuqi Xia, Yinuo Wang, Guowu Sun, Wanyang Lei, Daoming Liang","doi":"10.1159/000542921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><p>Introduction: Adjustable intragastric balloon (aIGB), known as a novel minimally invasive therapy for obesity, provides a sustained alternative for weight loss. Weight loss is achieved by implanting a balloon into the patient's stomach, with the volume of the balloon being adjustable through the injection or extraction of physiological saline. Its key distinction from other intragastric balloons lies in post-implantation volume control. Currently, the efficacy and safety of aIGB have not been well described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles. Efficacy and safety of aIGB were evaluated by total body weight loss (TWL) after treatment and severe adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 eligible studies with 4,981 patients were included. The average inserting time was 9.9 months, and the pooled mean TWL was 16.4% (95% CI: 0.153-0.175, I2 = 91.2%). The pooled prevalence of patients choosing upward balloon adjustment was 34.2% (95% CI: 0.220-0.485, I2 = 96.5), and all reported additional weight loss with a mean of 6.3 (4.8-9.3) kg. The pooled prevalence of patients choosing downward balloon adjustment was 9.2% (95% CI: 0.065-0.119, I2 = 73.9%), and the pooled prevalence of alleviating intolerance in these patients was 90.8% (95% CI: 0.817-0.974, I2 = 53.4%). The pooled prevalence of intolerance and early removal within 3 months was 5.7% (95% CI: 0.035-0.078, I2 = 79.8%), and the pooled prevalence of stomach ulcer was 1.1% (95% CI: 0.008-0.014, I2 = 5.1%). There was no obvious publication bias detected for these outcomes. Leave-one-out and subgroup analysis demonstrated the results were statistically reliable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>aIGB has the ability of significant and sustained weight loss and can effectively manage both intolerance and weight loss plateaus by adjusting the balloon volume during treatment. </p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":19414,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Facts","volume":" ","pages":"415-428"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Facts","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542921","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adjustable intragastric balloon (aIGB), known as a novel minimally invasive therapy for obesity, provides a sustained alternative for weight loss. Weight loss is achieved by implanting a balloon into the patient's stomach, with the volume of the balloon being adjustable through the injection or extraction of physiological saline. Its key distinction from other intragastric balloons lies in post-implantation volume control. Currently, the efficacy and safety of aIGB have not been well described.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles. Efficacy and safety of aIGB were evaluated by total body weight loss (TWL) after treatment and severe adverse events.

Results: A total of 12 eligible studies with 4,981 patients were included. The average inserting time was 9.9 months, and the pooled mean TWL was 16.4% (95% CI: 0.153-0.175, I2 = 91.2%). The pooled prevalence of patients choosing upward balloon adjustment was 34.2% (95% CI: 0.220-0.485, I2 = 96.5), and all reported additional weight loss with a mean of 6.3 (4.8-9.3) kg. The pooled prevalence of patients choosing downward balloon adjustment was 9.2% (95% CI: 0.065-0.119, I2 = 73.9%), and the pooled prevalence of alleviating intolerance in these patients was 90.8% (95% CI: 0.817-0.974, I2 = 53.4%). The pooled prevalence of intolerance and early removal within 3 months was 5.7% (95% CI: 0.035-0.078, I2 = 79.8%), and the pooled prevalence of stomach ulcer was 1.1% (95% CI: 0.008-0.014, I2 = 5.1%). There was no obvious publication bias detected for these outcomes. Leave-one-out and subgroup analysis demonstrated the results were statistically reliable.

Conclusion: aIGB has the ability of significant and sustained weight loss and can effectively manage both intolerance and weight loss plateaus by adjusting the balloon volume during treatment.

.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可调节胃内球囊减肥的有效性和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
简介:可调胃内球囊(aIGB)是一种新型的微创治疗肥胖的方法,为减肥提供了一种持续的选择。减肥是通过在患者胃中植入一个球囊来实现的,球囊的体积可以通过注射或抽取生理盐水来调节。它与其他胃内气球的主要区别在于植入后的体积控制。目前,对aIGB的疗效和安全性还没有很好的描述。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆相关文献。以治疗后总体重减轻(TWL)和严重不良事件评价aIGB的疗效和安全性。结果:共纳入12项符合条件的研究,4981例患者。平均插入时间9.9个月,合并平均TWL为16.4% (95%CI 0.153 ~ 0.175, I2 = 91.2%)。选择向上调整球囊的患者的总患病率为34.2% (95%CI 0.220 - 0.485, I2 = 96.5),所有患者均报告额外体重减轻,平均为6.3 (4.8~9.3)kg。选择下行球囊调整的患者总患病率为9.2% (95%CI 0.065 ~ 0.119, I2 = 73.9%),缓解不耐受的患者总患病率为90.8% (95%CI 0.817 ~ 0.974, I2 = 53.4%)。3个月内不耐受和早期清除的总患病率为5.7% (95%CI 0.035 ~ 0.078, I2 = 79.8%),胃溃疡的总患病率为1.1% (95%CI 0.008 ~ 0.014, I2 = 5.1%)。这些结果未发现明显的发表偏倚。留一分析和亚组分析表明结果在统计学上是可靠的。结论:aIGB具有显著且持续的减重能力,在治疗过程中通过调节球囊容积可有效控制不耐受和减重平台期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Facts
Obesity Facts 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Obesity Facts'' publishes articles covering all aspects of obesity, in particular epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis, treatment, and the prevention of adiposity. As obesity is related to many disease processes, the journal is also dedicated to all topics pertaining to comorbidity and covers psychological and sociocultural aspects as well as influences of nutrition and exercise on body weight. The editors carefully select papers to present only the most recent findings in clinical practice and research. All professionals concerned with obesity issues will find this journal a most valuable update to keep them abreast of the latest scientific developments.
期刊最新文献
World's first revisional metabolic bariatric surgery under regional anesthesia: Laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, a case report. Visceral, not abdominal subcutaneous, fat cell size associates with metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease in severe obesity. Reply to the Letter to the Editor: "Education in Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery: Findings from the Young - IFSO Survey. From Recognition to Action: Bridging Science and Policy through the Italian Obesity Law - A Model for Europe. Abdominal Adipose Tissue Fibrosis as an Obesity Biomarker in Clinical Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1