The Efficacy and Safety of Adjustable Intragastric Balloon for Weight Loss: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Facts Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1159/000542921
Chuqi Xia, Yinuo Wang, Guowu Sun, Wanyang Lei, Daoming Liang
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of Adjustable Intragastric Balloon for Weight Loss: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Chuqi Xia, Yinuo Wang, Guowu Sun, Wanyang Lei, Daoming Liang","doi":"10.1159/000542921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adjustable intragastric balloon (aIGB), as known as a novel minimally invasive therapy for obesity, provide a sustained alternative for weight loss. Weight loss is achieved by implanting a balloon into the patient's stomach, with the volume of the balloon being adjustable through the injection or extraction of physiological saline. Its key distinction from other intragastric balloons lies in post-implantation volume control. Currently, the efficacy and safety of aIGB have not been well described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles. Efficacy and safety of aIGB were evaluated by total body weight loss (TWL) after treatment and severe adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 eligible studies with 4981 patients were included. The average inserting time was 9.9 months, and the pooled mean TWL was 16.4% (95%CI 0.153 - 0.175, I2 = 91.2%). The pooled prevalence of patients choosing upward balloon adjustment was 34.2% (95%CI 0.220 - 0.485, I2 = 96.5), and all reported additional weight loss with a mean of 6.3 (4.8~9.3) kg. The pooled prevalence of patients choosing downward balloon adjustment was 9.2% (95%CI 0.065 - 0.119, I2 = 73.9%), and the pooled prevalence of alleviating intolerance in these patients was 90.8% (95%CI 0.817-0.974, I2 = 53.4%). The pooled prevalence of intolerance and early removal within 3 months was 5.7% (95%CI 0.035 - 0.078, I2 = 79.8%), and the pooled prevalence of stomach ulcer was 1.1% (95%CI 0.008 - 0.014, I2 = 5.1%). There was no obvious publication bias detected for these outcomes. Leave-one-out and subgroup analysis demonstrated the results were statistically reliable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>aIGB has the ability of significant and sustained weight loss, and can effectively manage both intolerance and weight loss plateaus by adjusting the balloon volume during treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19414,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Facts","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Facts","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542921","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adjustable intragastric balloon (aIGB), as known as a novel minimally invasive therapy for obesity, provide a sustained alternative for weight loss. Weight loss is achieved by implanting a balloon into the patient's stomach, with the volume of the balloon being adjustable through the injection or extraction of physiological saline. Its key distinction from other intragastric balloons lies in post-implantation volume control. Currently, the efficacy and safety of aIGB have not been well described.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles. Efficacy and safety of aIGB were evaluated by total body weight loss (TWL) after treatment and severe adverse events.

Results: A total of 12 eligible studies with 4981 patients were included. The average inserting time was 9.9 months, and the pooled mean TWL was 16.4% (95%CI 0.153 - 0.175, I2 = 91.2%). The pooled prevalence of patients choosing upward balloon adjustment was 34.2% (95%CI 0.220 - 0.485, I2 = 96.5), and all reported additional weight loss with a mean of 6.3 (4.8~9.3) kg. The pooled prevalence of patients choosing downward balloon adjustment was 9.2% (95%CI 0.065 - 0.119, I2 = 73.9%), and the pooled prevalence of alleviating intolerance in these patients was 90.8% (95%CI 0.817-0.974, I2 = 53.4%). The pooled prevalence of intolerance and early removal within 3 months was 5.7% (95%CI 0.035 - 0.078, I2 = 79.8%), and the pooled prevalence of stomach ulcer was 1.1% (95%CI 0.008 - 0.014, I2 = 5.1%). There was no obvious publication bias detected for these outcomes. Leave-one-out and subgroup analysis demonstrated the results were statistically reliable.

Conclusion: aIGB has the ability of significant and sustained weight loss, and can effectively manage both intolerance and weight loss plateaus by adjusting the balloon volume during treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Facts
Obesity Facts 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Obesity Facts'' publishes articles covering all aspects of obesity, in particular epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis, treatment, and the prevention of adiposity. As obesity is related to many disease processes, the journal is also dedicated to all topics pertaining to comorbidity and covers psychological and sociocultural aspects as well as influences of nutrition and exercise on body weight. The editors carefully select papers to present only the most recent findings in clinical practice and research. All professionals concerned with obesity issues will find this journal a most valuable update to keep them abreast of the latest scientific developments.
期刊最新文献
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychosocial distress in adolescents with obesity compared to those with type1 diabetes: Results from the KICK-COVID Study in Germany. The Efficacy and Safety of Adjustable Intragastric Balloon for Weight Loss: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Parental perceptions of preschool children's weight status in China: A cross-sectional study. Internalized Shame in Treatment-Seeking Adults with Obesity Class II-III and Its Association with Quality of Life, Body Image, and Self-Esteem. Association of abdominal volume index with asymptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis in rural Chinese adults: a population-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1