Improving uptake of lung cancer screening: an observational study on the impact of timed appointments and reminders.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Thorax Pub Date : 2025-04-15 DOI:10.1136/thorax-2024-222433
Amyn Bhamani, Sindhu Bhaarrati Naidu, Tanya Patrick, Lavanya Anandan, Kiran Desai, Fanta Bojang, Priyam Verghese, Paul Robinson, Shivani Patel, Ricky Thakrar, Arjun Nair, Neal Navani, Sam M Janes
{"title":"Improving uptake of lung cancer screening: an observational study on the impact of timed appointments and reminders.","authors":"Amyn Bhamani, Sindhu Bhaarrati Naidu, Tanya Patrick, Lavanya Anandan, Kiran Desai, Fanta Bojang, Priyam Verghese, Paul Robinson, Shivani Patel, Ricky Thakrar, Arjun Nair, Neal Navani, Sam M Janes","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-222433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces lung cancer-related mortality; however, uptake remains low compared with other cancer screening programmes. In this observational study, we report the impact of timed appointments and reminders on participation in our regional LCS programme.Initial uptake of timed appointments was 53.0% (n=17 274/32 593), higher than previously reported in the UK, while initial uptake of open invitations was 29.8% (n=10 246/34 371). Among initial non-responders, 17.5% (n=4263/24 400) completed triage following a reminder. The increased participation following reminders only partially offset the significant difference in initial uptake between the two appointment types.Timed appointments and reminders are strongly advocated to increase participation in national LCS programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":" ","pages":"339-342"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222433","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces lung cancer-related mortality; however, uptake remains low compared with other cancer screening programmes. In this observational study, we report the impact of timed appointments and reminders on participation in our regional LCS programme.Initial uptake of timed appointments was 53.0% (n=17 274/32 593), higher than previously reported in the UK, while initial uptake of open invitations was 29.8% (n=10 246/34 371). Among initial non-responders, 17.5% (n=4263/24 400) completed triage following a reminder. The increased participation following reminders only partially offset the significant difference in initial uptake between the two appointment types.Timed appointments and reminders are strongly advocated to increase participation in national LCS programmes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善肺癌筛查的吸收:一项关于定时预约和提醒影响的观察性研究。
肺癌筛查(LCS)可降低肺癌相关死亡率;然而,与其他癌症筛查项目相比,它的使用率仍然很低。在这项观察性研究中,我们报告了定时预约和提醒对参与我们区域LCS计划的影响。初次接受定时预约的比例为53.0% (n=17 274/32 593),高于此前在英国的报道,而初次接受公开邀请的比例为29.8% (n=10 246/34 371)。在最初无反应者中,17.5% (n=4263/ 24400)在提醒后完成了分诊。提醒后参与率的增加只是部分抵消了两种预约类型在初始吸收方面的显著差异。强烈提倡定时预约和提醒,以增加对国家LCS规划的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thorax
Thorax 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
197
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.
期刊最新文献
Is it time to re-evaluate the levels of evidence in medical research: commentary on inhaled corticosteroids in COPD. Smoking cessation within lung cancer screening: how much more evidence is needed? Creating certainty in uncertainty: improving spirometry interpretation. Association of blood eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide with exacerbations in patients with asthma, COPD and asthma+COPD: the NOVELTY study. Determinants of declining lung function trajectories from childhood to adulthood after preterm birth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1