Nutrition in cancer patients: analysis of the forum of women´s self-help association against cancer.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS BMC Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1186/s40795-025-01027-z
A Fettig, V Mathies, J Hübner
{"title":"Nutrition in cancer patients: analysis of the forum of women´s self-help association against cancer.","authors":"A Fettig, V Mathies, J Hübner","doi":"10.1186/s40795-025-01027-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Online forums play a crucial role for cancer patients seeking nutrition-related information and support. This study investigated the most common nutrition-related questions and concerns among members of the Women's Self-Help Association Against Cancer, focusing on emotional, physical, and practical aspects of dietary changes in cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was used, combining qualitative and quantitative content analysis of 5314 forum responses. The themes identified included common questions, patient contributions, physician involvement, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2246 posts across 22 threads were analyzed, spanning 3867 days and receiving 654,100 visits. Key topics included 41 themes and 356 questions, with common inquiries like \"Has your diet changed since your diagnosis?\" (45 responses) and \"Is sugar allowed in your diet?\" (29 responses). There were 4958 contributions, with 558 evidence-based responses (e.g., recommending balanced diets) and 200 non-evidence-based responses (e.g., fasting, cancer-specific diets). Concerns regarding sugar (188 responses), dairy (121 responses), and emotional stress (187 responses) were common. Despite evidence-based recommendations from healthcare professionals supporting balanced diets, members frequently encounter non-evidence-based advice on fasting- and cancer-specific diets, leading to significant emotional and nutritional challenges. Additionally, Members emphasized the need to balance the enjoyment of food with dietary restrictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The forum is a valuable resource for sharing experiences and advice; however, non-evidence-based content underscores the need for moderation and expert input. Collaboration between medical professionals and moderators can improve content reliability, enabling informed dietary decisions for cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"11 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01027-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Online forums play a crucial role for cancer patients seeking nutrition-related information and support. This study investigated the most common nutrition-related questions and concerns among members of the Women's Self-Help Association Against Cancer, focusing on emotional, physical, and practical aspects of dietary changes in cancer patients.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used, combining qualitative and quantitative content analysis of 5314 forum responses. The themes identified included common questions, patient contributions, physician involvement, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the discussions.

Results: In total, 2246 posts across 22 threads were analyzed, spanning 3867 days and receiving 654,100 visits. Key topics included 41 themes and 356 questions, with common inquiries like "Has your diet changed since your diagnosis?" (45 responses) and "Is sugar allowed in your diet?" (29 responses). There were 4958 contributions, with 558 evidence-based responses (e.g., recommending balanced diets) and 200 non-evidence-based responses (e.g., fasting, cancer-specific diets). Concerns regarding sugar (188 responses), dairy (121 responses), and emotional stress (187 responses) were common. Despite evidence-based recommendations from healthcare professionals supporting balanced diets, members frequently encounter non-evidence-based advice on fasting- and cancer-specific diets, leading to significant emotional and nutritional challenges. Additionally, Members emphasized the need to balance the enjoyment of food with dietary restrictions.

Conclusion: The forum is a valuable resource for sharing experiences and advice; however, non-evidence-based content underscores the need for moderation and expert input. Collaboration between medical professionals and moderators can improve content reliability, enabling informed dietary decisions for cancer patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of oral nutrition supplements on anthropometric and functional parameters among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Effects of productive safety net program on children's nutritional outcomes in Ethiopia: a systematic review without meta-analysis. Nutrition in cancer patients: analysis of the forum of women´s self-help association against cancer. Efficacy of different nutrition interventions on sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Benchmarking the healthiness, equity and environmental sustainability of university food environments in Australia, 2021/22.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1