Evaluating ChatGPT's Ability to Address Frequently Asked Questions in Gender-Affirmation Surgery.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Homosexuality Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1080/00918369.2025.2466712
Evan Rothchild, Geena Jung, Joseph A Ricci
{"title":"Evaluating ChatGPT's Ability to Address Frequently Asked Questions in Gender-Affirmation Surgery.","authors":"Evan Rothchild, Geena Jung, Joseph A Ricci","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2466712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ChatGPT has significantly influenced healthcare, yet its impact on patient education regarding gender-affirmation surgery (GAS) remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate ChatGPT's utility in providing medical information to patients seeking GAS. In the first part of the study, we collected questions from the \"Ask a Surgeon\" forum hosted by the American Society of Plastic Surgery and compared responses from verified physicians on the forum to those generated by ChatGPT. We found that ChatGPT's responses were significantly more complex across five readability metrics but had significantly higher DISCERN and PEMAT scores compared to physician responses, indicating superior reliability, quality, and understandability. In the second part of our study, ChatGPT was queried using ten frequently asked questions to simulate a patient's experience seeking treatment information. ChatGPT's responses were generally detailed and on-topic, emphasized the importance of consulting a healthcare provider, and highlighted the psychological and emotional factors associated with GAS. Overall, ChatGPT showed promise as an effective tool for patient education in GAS. It provides clear, private information, correctly emphasizes the psychosocial needs of this patient population, and consistently advises consultation with healthcare professionals. However, its high reading level and lack of transparent references raise concerns about its implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"142-153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2466712","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ChatGPT has significantly influenced healthcare, yet its impact on patient education regarding gender-affirmation surgery (GAS) remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate ChatGPT's utility in providing medical information to patients seeking GAS. In the first part of the study, we collected questions from the "Ask a Surgeon" forum hosted by the American Society of Plastic Surgery and compared responses from verified physicians on the forum to those generated by ChatGPT. We found that ChatGPT's responses were significantly more complex across five readability metrics but had significantly higher DISCERN and PEMAT scores compared to physician responses, indicating superior reliability, quality, and understandability. In the second part of our study, ChatGPT was queried using ten frequently asked questions to simulate a patient's experience seeking treatment information. ChatGPT's responses were generally detailed and on-topic, emphasized the importance of consulting a healthcare provider, and highlighted the psychological and emotional factors associated with GAS. Overall, ChatGPT showed promise as an effective tool for patient education in GAS. It provides clear, private information, correctly emphasizes the psychosocial needs of this patient population, and consistently advises consultation with healthcare professionals. However, its high reading level and lack of transparent references raise concerns about its implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估ChatGPT解决性别确认手术中常见问题的能力。
ChatGPT对医疗保健产生了重大影响,但其对性别确认手术(GAS)患者教育的影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在评估ChatGPT在为寻求GAS的患者提供医疗信息方面的效用。在研究的第一部分,我们从美国整形外科学会主办的“询问外科医生”论坛上收集问题,并将论坛上经过认证的医生的回答与ChatGPT生成的回答进行比较。我们发现,ChatGPT的回答在五个可读性指标上明显更复杂,但与医生的回答相比,其DISCERN和PEMAT得分明显更高,表明具有更高的可靠性、质量和可理解性。在我们研究的第二部分,ChatGPT使用10个常见问题来模拟患者寻求治疗信息的经历。ChatGPT的回答一般都是详细和切题的,强调咨询医疗保健提供者的重要性,并强调了与GAS相关的心理和情感因素。总体而言,ChatGPT有望成为GAS患者教育的有效工具。它提供了清晰、私密的信息,正确地强调了这一患者群体的心理社会需求,并始终建议咨询医疗保健专业人员。然而,它的高阅读水平和缺乏透明的参考文献引起了人们对其实施的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
期刊最新文献
It's Haram, but Who Am I to Judge? Exploring and Unpacking Muslims' Religious Perspectives Toward Homosexuality. Health and Social Consequences of the Same-Sex Marriage Prohibition Act for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Population in Nigeria: A Scoping Review. "Like Going Through High School All Over Again" - A Social Identity Perspective on Conflict, Exclusion, and Belonging in Online Communities of LGBTQ+ Adults. Rethinking "Benevolent Heterosexism": A Critical Look at Nuance and Omission in LGBTQ+ Prejudice Research. Initial Reliability Findings of Observational Measures of LGBTQ+ Mental Health Therapist Clinical Competence Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1