Ideal Timing of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting After Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.024
Anthony V. Norman MD, MSc , Matthew P. Weber MD, MS , Mohamad El Moheb MD , Alexander M. Wisniewski MD, MSc , Raymond J. Strobel MD, MSc , Alan Speir MD , Michael Mazzeffi MD , Aarathi Manchikalapudi HS , Mark Joseph MD , Daniel Tang MD , Ramesh Singh MD , Mohammed Quader MD , Jared P. Beller MD , Kenan Yount MD, MBA , Nicholas R. Teman MD
{"title":"Ideal Timing of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting After Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction","authors":"Anthony V. Norman MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Matthew P. Weber MD, MS ,&nbsp;Mohamad El Moheb MD ,&nbsp;Alexander M. Wisniewski MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Raymond J. Strobel MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Alan Speir MD ,&nbsp;Michael Mazzeffi MD ,&nbsp;Aarathi Manchikalapudi HS ,&nbsp;Mark Joseph MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Tang MD ,&nbsp;Ramesh Singh MD ,&nbsp;Mohammed Quader MD ,&nbsp;Jared P. Beller MD ,&nbsp;Kenan Yount MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Nicholas R. Teman MD","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) benefit from revascularization, but guidelines are vague regarding optimal timing. This study aimed to identify the ideal timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after NSTEMI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Study investigators examined patients with NSTEMI who underwent isolated CABG within 30 days of cardiac catheterization between July 2011 and July 2023 in a multicenter regional collaborative. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: ≤2 days, 3 to 7 days, and 8 to 30 days. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Study investigators identified 10,271 patients who underwent CABG: 3464 (34%) of these patients underwent CABG within ≤2 days, 5751 (56%) at 3 to 7 days, and 1056 (10%) at 8 to 30 days. The 3- to 7-day group had the lowest median The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality (1.36% vs 1.35% vs 2.09%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The ≤2-day group more frequently presented with left main coronary artery disease (19% vs 16% vs 16%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and cardiogenic shock (5.1% vs 1.8% vs 2%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was similar among the groups (97 minutes vs 97 minutes vs 97 minutes; <em>P</em> = .63). The 3- to 7-day group had the lowest operative mortality (3.2% vs 1.8% vs 4%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and major morbidity (14% vs 11% vs 16%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). After risk-adjustment, the 3- to 7-day window was associated with decreased mortality compared with ≤2 days (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.4-0.78; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and 8 to 30 days (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.81; <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CABG between 3 and 7 days after cardiac catheterization for NSTEMI was associated with the lowest risk of mortality. When possible, CABG within this window may afford better outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":"120 2","pages":"Pages 321-328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003497525001134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) benefit from revascularization, but guidelines are vague regarding optimal timing. This study aimed to identify the ideal timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after NSTEMI.

Methods

Study investigators examined patients with NSTEMI who underwent isolated CABG within 30 days of cardiac catheterization between July 2011 and July 2023 in a multicenter regional collaborative. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: ≤2 days, 3 to 7 days, and 8 to 30 days. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with mortality.

Results

Study investigators identified 10,271 patients who underwent CABG: 3464 (34%) of these patients underwent CABG within ≤2 days, 5751 (56%) at 3 to 7 days, and 1056 (10%) at 8 to 30 days. The 3- to 7-day group had the lowest median The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality (1.36% vs 1.35% vs 2.09%; P < .001). The ≤2-day group more frequently presented with left main coronary artery disease (19% vs 16% vs 16%; P < .001) and cardiogenic shock (5.1% vs 1.8% vs 2%; P < .001). Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was similar among the groups (97 minutes vs 97 minutes vs 97 minutes; P = .63). The 3- to 7-day group had the lowest operative mortality (3.2% vs 1.8% vs 4%; P < .001) and major morbidity (14% vs 11% vs 16%; P < .001). After risk-adjustment, the 3- to 7-day window was associated with decreased mortality compared with ≤2 days (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.4-0.78; P < .001) and 8 to 30 days (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.81; P < .001).

Conclusions

CABG between 3 and 7 days after cardiac catheterization for NSTEMI was associated with the lowest risk of mortality. When possible, CABG within this window may afford better outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非st段抬高型心肌梗死后冠状动脉搭桥术的理想时机。
背景:非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者可从血运重建术中获益,但指南对于最佳时机尚不明确。我们旨在确定NSTEMI后冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的理想时机。方法:我们采用多中心区域合作的方法,对2011年7月至2023年7月间30天内接受心导管置换术的NSTEMI患者进行了研究。患者被分为三组:结果:我们确定了10271例CABG患者,其中3464例(34%)在NSTEMI心导管置入术后3-7天内进行了CABG。在可能的情况下,在这段时间内进行冠脉搭桥可能会有更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
HFNC vs LMA or Double-Lumen Tube in Thoracoscopic Surgery. Closed-Chest Robotic vs. Port Access Approach for Mitral Repair: Comparison of postoperative outcomes. Contemporary Use of Circulatory Arrest and Selective Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion During Neonatal Aortic Arch Surgery - International Survey. Recent Advances in Lung Transplantation: Innovations Shaping the Next Era. Hospital-Level Variation in Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients Younger than 65 Years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1