Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery for Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Comparative Study

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.023
Connor Raikar BA , Stanley Wolfe MD, MPH , Luigi F. Lagazzi MD , Ali Darehzereshki MD , Nathan Kister MD , Lawrence Wei MD , Vinay Badhwar MD , J. Hunter Mehaffey MD, MS
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery for Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Comparative Study","authors":"Connor Raikar BA ,&nbsp;Stanley Wolfe MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Luigi F. Lagazzi MD ,&nbsp;Ali Darehzereshki MD ,&nbsp;Nathan Kister MD ,&nbsp;Lawrence Wei MD ,&nbsp;Vinay Badhwar MD ,&nbsp;J. Hunter Mehaffey MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with endocarditis frequently require valve surgical procedure, and despite the recent growth of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) for complex valve operations, consensus recommendations still suggest conventional sternotomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The institutional Adult Cardiac Surgery Database of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) evaluated all patients undergoing valve surgical procedure for endocarditis from July 2016 to March 2024. Patients were stratified by conventional sternotomy vs an MICS approach, including hemisternotomy, right thoracotomy, and robotic-assisted mitral, tricuspid, or aortic valve surgical procedure. Logistic regression assessed the risk-adjusted association with the primary outcomes of STS major morbidity or mortality and the MICS approach by accounting for all covariates in current STS risk models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 741 patients undergoing valve surgical procedure for endocarditis, the median age was 37 years, 582 (78.5%) had a substance use disorder, 210 (28.3%) underwent redo sternotomies, and 166 (22.4%) had redo valve operations. MICS was associated with a higher repair rate for mitral valves (76.3% vs 48%; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001) but a lower rate for tricuspid valve (22.5% vs 44.1%; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001), with no difference for aortic valves (8.3% vs 7.4%; <em>P</em> = .372). Before risk adjustment, MICS was associated with longer cross-clamp times (99 minutes vs 86 minutes; <em>P</em> = 0.019) but a lower incidence of STS major morbidity or mortality (15.4% vs 27.8%; <em>P</em> = 0.019). After robust risk adjustment, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.1; <em>P</em> = 0.008), lung disease (OR, 2.2; <em>P</em> = 0.010), preoperative creatinine (OR, 1.3; <em>P</em> = 0.016), and valve repair vs replacement (OR, 0.17; <em>P</em> = 0.002), but not MICS (OR, 1.2; <em>P</em> = 0.807), were independently associated with STS major morbidity and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MICS valve surgical procedure for endocarditis appears both safe and effective, with repair rates and risk-adjusted outcomes similar to those of open surgical procedure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":"119 5","pages":"Pages 1020-1026"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003497525001122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with endocarditis frequently require valve surgical procedure, and despite the recent growth of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) for complex valve operations, consensus recommendations still suggest conventional sternotomy.

Methods

The institutional Adult Cardiac Surgery Database of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) evaluated all patients undergoing valve surgical procedure for endocarditis from July 2016 to March 2024. Patients were stratified by conventional sternotomy vs an MICS approach, including hemisternotomy, right thoracotomy, and robotic-assisted mitral, tricuspid, or aortic valve surgical procedure. Logistic regression assessed the risk-adjusted association with the primary outcomes of STS major morbidity or mortality and the MICS approach by accounting for all covariates in current STS risk models.

Results

Of 741 patients undergoing valve surgical procedure for endocarditis, the median age was 37 years, 582 (78.5%) had a substance use disorder, 210 (28.3%) underwent redo sternotomies, and 166 (22.4%) had redo valve operations. MICS was associated with a higher repair rate for mitral valves (76.3% vs 48%; P < .0001) but a lower rate for tricuspid valve (22.5% vs 44.1%; P < .0001), with no difference for aortic valves (8.3% vs 7.4%; P = .372). Before risk adjustment, MICS was associated with longer cross-clamp times (99 minutes vs 86 minutes; P = 0.019) but a lower incidence of STS major morbidity or mortality (15.4% vs 27.8%; P = 0.019). After robust risk adjustment, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.1; P = 0.008), lung disease (OR, 2.2; P = 0.010), preoperative creatinine (OR, 1.3; P = 0.016), and valve repair vs replacement (OR, 0.17; P = 0.002), but not MICS (OR, 1.2; P = 0.807), were independently associated with STS major morbidity and mortality.

Conclusions

MICS valve surgical procedure for endocarditis appears both safe and effective, with repair rates and risk-adjusted outcomes similar to those of open surgical procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创瓣膜手术治疗感染性心内膜炎的比较研究。
背景:心内膜炎患者经常需要瓣膜手术,尽管最近微创心脏手术(MICS)在复杂瓣膜手术中的应用有所增加,但共识建议仍然是传统的胸骨切开术。方法:美国胸外科学会(STS)成人心脏外科数据库对2016年1月至2024年3月期间接受心内膜炎瓣膜手术的所有患者进行评估。患者按常规胸骨切开术与MICS入路进行分层,包括半胸骨切开术、右胸切开术和机器人辅助二尖瓣/三尖瓣/主动脉瓣手术。Logistic回归评估了经风险调整后与STS主要发病率或死亡率主要结局的相关性,MICS方法考虑了当前STS风险模型中的所有协变量。结果:741例心内膜炎瓣膜手术患者中位年龄37岁,582例(78.5%)存在物质使用障碍,210例(28.3%)重做胸骨切开术,166例(22.4%)重做瓣膜手术。MICS与二尖瓣修复率较高相关(76.3% vs 48%)。结论:MICS治疗心内膜炎的瓣膜手术安全有效,修复率和风险调整后的结果与开放手术相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
HFNC vs LMA or Double-Lumen Tube in Thoracoscopic Surgery. Closed-Chest Robotic vs. Port Access Approach for Mitral Repair: Comparison of postoperative outcomes. Contemporary Use of Circulatory Arrest and Selective Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion During Neonatal Aortic Arch Surgery - International Survey. Recent Advances in Lung Transplantation: Innovations Shaping the Next Era. Hospital-Level Variation in Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients Younger than 65 Years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1