Safety profile of semaglutide versus placebo in the SELECT study: a randomized controlled trial

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1002/oby.24222
Robert F. Kushner, Donna H. Ryan, John Deanfield, Alexander Kokkinos, Cintia Cercato, John Wilding, Bartolome Burguera, Chau-Chung Wu, Anca-Elena Craciun, Denes Pall, Irene Hramiak, Jøran Hjelmesæth, Nina M. Harder-Lauridsen, Petra Weimers, Ole Kleist Jeppesen, Klaus Kallenbach, A. Michael Lincoff, Ildiko Lingvay
{"title":"Safety profile of semaglutide versus placebo in the SELECT study: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Robert F. Kushner,&nbsp;Donna H. Ryan,&nbsp;John Deanfield,&nbsp;Alexander Kokkinos,&nbsp;Cintia Cercato,&nbsp;John Wilding,&nbsp;Bartolome Burguera,&nbsp;Chau-Chung Wu,&nbsp;Anca-Elena Craciun,&nbsp;Denes Pall,&nbsp;Irene Hramiak,&nbsp;Jøran Hjelmesæth,&nbsp;Nina M. Harder-Lauridsen,&nbsp;Petra Weimers,&nbsp;Ole Kleist Jeppesen,&nbsp;Klaus Kallenbach,&nbsp;A. Michael Lincoff,&nbsp;Ildiko Lingvay","doi":"10.1002/oby.24222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study was to assess safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo, beyond reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, in patients with established cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Safety data focused on serious adverse events (SAEs), all adverse events (AEs) leading to permanent treatment discontinuation irrespective of seriousness, and prespecified AEs of special interest irrespective of seriousness. Tests of treatment differences were determined by two-sided <i>p</i> values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The proportion of patients with SAEs was lower with semaglutide versus placebo (33.4% vs. 36.4%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), primarily driven by cardiac disorders (11.5% vs. 13.5%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The proportion of patients with AEs leading to discontinuation was higher with semaglutide versus placebo (16.6% vs. 8.2%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), a difference driven by gastrointestinal disorders (10.0% vs. 2.0%); however, proportions due to SAEs leading to discontinuation were similar (3.6% vs. 4.1%). Suicide/self-injury SAEs were low and balanced between groups (0.11% in both groups). Gallbladder-related disorders were more frequent with semaglutide versus placebo (2.8% vs. 2.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.04), mainly driven by cholelithiasis (1.4% vs. 1.1%), whereas proportions of cholecystitis were similar between groups (0.6% vs. 0.6%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The long-term safety profile observed in the Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Overweight or Obesity (SELECT) study is consistent with previously reported semaglutide studies. No new safety concerns were identified for once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"33 3","pages":"452-462"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oby.24222","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo, beyond reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, in patients with established cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity.

Methods

Safety data focused on serious adverse events (SAEs), all adverse events (AEs) leading to permanent treatment discontinuation irrespective of seriousness, and prespecified AEs of special interest irrespective of seriousness. Tests of treatment differences were determined by two-sided p values.

Results

The proportion of patients with SAEs was lower with semaglutide versus placebo (33.4% vs. 36.4%; p < 0.001), primarily driven by cardiac disorders (11.5% vs. 13.5%; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with AEs leading to discontinuation was higher with semaglutide versus placebo (16.6% vs. 8.2%; p < 0.001), a difference driven by gastrointestinal disorders (10.0% vs. 2.0%); however, proportions due to SAEs leading to discontinuation were similar (3.6% vs. 4.1%). Suicide/self-injury SAEs were low and balanced between groups (0.11% in both groups). Gallbladder-related disorders were more frequent with semaglutide versus placebo (2.8% vs. 2.3%; p = 0.04), mainly driven by cholelithiasis (1.4% vs. 1.1%), whereas proportions of cholecystitis were similar between groups (0.6% vs. 0.6%).

Conclusions

The long-term safety profile observed in the Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Overweight or Obesity (SELECT) study is consistent with previously reported semaglutide studies. No new safety concerns were identified for once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
semaglutide与安慰剂在SELECT研究中的安全性:一项随机对照试验。
研究目的本研究的目的是评估已确诊心血管疾病、超重或肥胖患者每周一次皮下注射2.4毫克塞马鲁肽与安慰剂相比,除了减少主要心血管不良事件之外的安全性:安全性数据主要包括严重不良事件(SAE)、导致永久性中断治疗的所有不良事件(AE)(无论其严重程度如何)以及预设的特殊不良事件(AE)(无论其严重程度如何)。治疗差异检验采用双侧 P 值:结果:与安慰剂相比,使用塞马鲁肽发生 SAEs 的患者比例较低(33.4% 对 36.4%;P 结论:塞马鲁肽的长期安全性状况与安慰剂相比更佳:塞马鲁肽对超重或肥胖症患者心血管结果的影响(SELECT)研究中观察到的长期安全性与之前报道的塞马鲁肽研究一致。没有发现每周一次的塞马鲁肽 2.4 毫克有新的安全性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity
Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
261
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Key Determinants of Weight Loss Trajectory Across Different Periods of a Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention The Weight of Social Risk and Opportunities for Obesity Prevention Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacological, Endoscopic, and Surgical Treatments for Obesity: A GRADE-Based Network Meta-Analysis The POWER of Sleep in Promoting Weight Loss Among Breast Cancer Survivors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1