Artificial intelligence in global health: An unfair future for health in Sub-Saharan Africa?

IF 2.7 Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf023
Audêncio Victor
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in global health: An unfair future for health in Sub-Saharan Africa?","authors":"Audêncio Victor","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential for global health, particularly in underdeveloped regions like Africa. However, the integration of AI into healthcare systems raises significant concerns regarding equity and fairness. This debate paper explores the challenges and risks associated with implementing AI in healthcare in Africa, focusing on the lack of infrastructure, data quality issues, and inadequate governance frameworks. It also explores the geopolitical and economic dynamics that exacerbate these disparities, including the impact of global competition and weakened international institutions. While highlighting the risks, the paper acknowledges the potential benefits of AI, including improved healthcare access, standardization of care, and enhanced health communication. To ensure equitable outcomes, it advocates for targeted policy measures, including infrastructure investment, capacity building, regulatory frameworks, and international collaboration. This comprehensive approach is essential to mitigate risks, harness the benefits of AI, and promote social justice in global health.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 2","pages":"qxaf023"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential for global health, particularly in underdeveloped regions like Africa. However, the integration of AI into healthcare systems raises significant concerns regarding equity and fairness. This debate paper explores the challenges and risks associated with implementing AI in healthcare in Africa, focusing on the lack of infrastructure, data quality issues, and inadequate governance frameworks. It also explores the geopolitical and economic dynamics that exacerbate these disparities, including the impact of global competition and weakened international institutions. While highlighting the risks, the paper acknowledges the potential benefits of AI, including improved healthcare access, standardization of care, and enhanced health communication. To ensure equitable outcomes, it advocates for targeted policy measures, including infrastructure investment, capacity building, regulatory frameworks, and international collaboration. This comprehensive approach is essential to mitigate risks, harness the benefits of AI, and promote social justice in global health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球卫生中的人工智能:撒哈拉以南非洲卫生的不公平未来?
人工智能对全球卫生具有变革性潜力,特别是在非洲等不发达地区。然而,将人工智能整合到医疗保健系统中引发了对公平和公平的重大担忧。本辩论文件探讨了与在非洲卫生保健领域实施人工智能相关的挑战和风险,重点是缺乏基础设施、数据质量问题和治理框架不足。它还探讨了加剧这些差距的地缘政治和经济动态,包括全球竞争和削弱国际机构的影响。在强调风险的同时,该论文承认人工智能的潜在好处,包括改善医疗保健服务、护理标准化和加强卫生沟通。为确保公平的结果,报告主张采取有针对性的政策措施,包括基础设施投资、能力建设、监管框架和国际合作。这一综合办法对于减轻风险、利用人工智能的惠益和促进全球卫生领域的社会正义至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Declining use of percutaneous coronary intervention across population groups, 2011-2022. Higher intensity care for patients with multiple chronic conditions after hospital-physician integration. Progress towards Healthy People 2030 population health goals. Patient perspectives on cost and quality measures in value-based cancer care. The history of state preemption and medical device regulation: lessons for artificial intelligence oversight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1