Increased functional and directed corticomuscular connectivity after dynamic motor practice but not isometric motor practice.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1152/jn.00061.2024
August Lomholt Nielsen, Malene Norup, Jonas Rud Bjørndal, Patrick Wiegel, Meaghan Elizabeth Spedden, Jesper Lundbye-Jensen
{"title":"Increased functional and directed corticomuscular connectivity after dynamic motor practice but not isometric motor practice.","authors":"August Lomholt Nielsen, Malene Norup, Jonas Rud Bjørndal, Patrick Wiegel, Meaghan Elizabeth Spedden, Jesper Lundbye-Jensen","doi":"10.1152/jn.00061.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How do differences in the constraints of a practiced motor task affect oscillatory functional connectivity between the motor cortex and muscle? Here, we investigate corticomuscular (CM) and intermuscular (IM) coherence during the hold-phase of a dynamic position control (PC) and isometric force control (FC) task. We also investigate the effects of PC motor practice requiring precise wrist flexions to designated target positions, and effects of FC motor practice involving isometric wrist flexions to designated target force levels or rest in a control group. In 46 young healthy adults (aged 20-30 yr), full-cap electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) were recorded from the flexor and extensor carpi radialis muscles during the tasks. Beta-band (15-35 Hz) CM and IM coherence were investigated as a task-related marker of oscillatory activity in the corticospinal system. At baseline, higher CM coupling was demonstrated during position control compared with force control. Following PC motor practice, CM β-band coherence increased (<i>P</i> = 0.038), whereas it remained unchanged for participants who practiced FC or rested. This pattern was also found for IM coherence. The increased oscillatory synchronization following PC practice was driven by greater descending signaling (<i>P</i> = 0.025). We speculate that the observed differences between position and force control relate to task differences in corticomuscular control-strategy and the influence of different sensory modalities during motor practice. We interpret the results as indicating increased coupling between the motor cortex and the motoneuron pool of the contracting muscle following dynamic motor practice emphasizing requirements for position control in motor learning.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We present the effects of different types of motor practice on functional connectivity in the corticomuscular system. We present differences in corticomuscular connectivity between tasks with position versus force control emphasis and evidence for increased functional and directed connectivity within the network specifically following position-control motor practice. These findings support using different control strategies based on task constraints and emphasize the importance of dynamic motor practice focused on position control for increasing coherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"930-943"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00061.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do differences in the constraints of a practiced motor task affect oscillatory functional connectivity between the motor cortex and muscle? Here, we investigate corticomuscular (CM) and intermuscular (IM) coherence during the hold-phase of a dynamic position control (PC) and isometric force control (FC) task. We also investigate the effects of PC motor practice requiring precise wrist flexions to designated target positions, and effects of FC motor practice involving isometric wrist flexions to designated target force levels or rest in a control group. In 46 young healthy adults (aged 20-30 yr), full-cap electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) were recorded from the flexor and extensor carpi radialis muscles during the tasks. Beta-band (15-35 Hz) CM and IM coherence were investigated as a task-related marker of oscillatory activity in the corticospinal system. At baseline, higher CM coupling was demonstrated during position control compared with force control. Following PC motor practice, CM β-band coherence increased (P = 0.038), whereas it remained unchanged for participants who practiced FC or rested. This pattern was also found for IM coherence. The increased oscillatory synchronization following PC practice was driven by greater descending signaling (P = 0.025). We speculate that the observed differences between position and force control relate to task differences in corticomuscular control-strategy and the influence of different sensory modalities during motor practice. We interpret the results as indicating increased coupling between the motor cortex and the motoneuron pool of the contracting muscle following dynamic motor practice emphasizing requirements for position control in motor learning.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We present the effects of different types of motor practice on functional connectivity in the corticomuscular system. We present differences in corticomuscular connectivity between tasks with position versus force control emphasis and evidence for increased functional and directed connectivity within the network specifically following position-control motor practice. These findings support using different control strategies based on task constraints and emphasize the importance of dynamic motor practice focused on position control for increasing coherence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态运动练习后功能性和定向皮质肌连通性增加,而等长运动练习后没有。
练习运动任务的约束差异如何影响运动皮层和肌肉之间的振荡功能连接?在这里,我们研究了动态位置控制(PC)和等距力控制(FC)任务保持阶段的皮质肌肉(CM)和肌间(IM)一致性。在对照组中,我们还研究了需要精确腕关节屈曲到指定目标位置的PC运动练习的效果,以及涉及等距腕关节屈曲到指定目标力水平或休息的FC运动练习的效果。对46名年龄在20-30岁的健康青年进行了实验,记录了桡腕肌屈伸肌的全帽脑电图(EEG)和肌电图(EMG)。β波段(15-35 Hz) CM和IM相干性作为皮质脊髓系统振荡活动的任务相关标记进行了研究。在基线时,与力控制相比,位置控制显示出更高的CM耦合。在进行PC运动训练后,CM β -频带相干性增加(P = 0.038),而在进行FC运动训练或休息的参与者中则保持不变。这一模式也适用于IM相干性。PC练习后振荡同步增加是由更大的下行信号驱动的(P = 0.025)。我们推测,观察到的位置和力量控制之间的差异与运动练习中皮质肌肉控制策略的任务差异和不同感觉模式的影响有关。我们将结果解释为运动皮层和收缩肌运动神经元池之间的耦合增加,在动态运动练习后强调运动学习中位置控制的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
期刊最新文献
Neurometabolic Substrate Utilization Governs Oxidative Phosphorylation Conductance in Cortex and Hippocampus. Comparative EEG analysis of the effects of ketamine enantiomers and metabolites in rhesus macaques. Specialized orientation representation of neurons in three-dimensional spatiotemporal frequency domain. The Temporal Stability of Visual Cortical Processing in Humans Depends on Early Experience. Monoaminergic Modulation of the Relation Between Motor Cortical Activity and Grip Force.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1