General surgeon workforce density is not associated with treatment-incidence ratios at the county or hospital service area level in North Carolina

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116231
Mustafa Abid , Mark Holmes , Anthony Charles
{"title":"General surgeon workforce density is not associated with treatment-incidence ratios at the county or hospital service area level in North Carolina","authors":"Mustafa Abid ,&nbsp;Mark Holmes ,&nbsp;Anthony Charles","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>General Surgeon Workforce Density (WFD) is used to approximate surgical access. Treatment-incidence ratios (TIR) provide a novel measure of care access. TIR's association with General Surgeon WFD has not been evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study of North Carolina inpatient discharges (2016–2019). The association between county and Hospital Service Area (HSA) TIRs for general surgical diseases was analyzed using adjusted linear and logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>When adjusting for pertinent covariates, county General Surgeon WFD and TIR (−0.0009, 95 ​% CI -0.028,0.026; p 0.95) and HSA General Surgeon WFD and TIR (0.008, 95 ​% CI -0.021,0.037; p ​0.58) were not statistically significantly associated. The odds of a county 0.91 (95 ​% CI 0.42,1.97; p 0.82) or HSA (OR 0.93, 95 ​% CI 0.43,2.04; p 0.86) having a high TIR was not associated with WFD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>General Surgeon WFD is not associated with disease-specific procedural rates of common surgical conditions at the county or HSA level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"242 ","pages":"Article 116231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025000534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

General Surgeon Workforce Density (WFD) is used to approximate surgical access. Treatment-incidence ratios (TIR) provide a novel measure of care access. TIR's association with General Surgeon WFD has not been evaluated.

Study design

Retrospective cohort study of North Carolina inpatient discharges (2016–2019). The association between county and Hospital Service Area (HSA) TIRs for general surgical diseases was analyzed using adjusted linear and logistic regression.

Results

When adjusting for pertinent covariates, county General Surgeon WFD and TIR (−0.0009, 95 ​% CI -0.028,0.026; p 0.95) and HSA General Surgeon WFD and TIR (0.008, 95 ​% CI -0.021,0.037; p ​0.58) were not statistically significantly associated. The odds of a county 0.91 (95 ​% CI 0.42,1.97; p 0.82) or HSA (OR 0.93, 95 ​% CI 0.43,2.04; p 0.86) having a high TIR was not associated with WFD.

Conclusion

General Surgeon WFD is not associated with disease-specific procedural rates of common surgical conditions at the county or HSA level.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在北卡罗来纳州,普通外科医生的劳动力密度与县或医院服务区域水平的治疗发病率无关
一般外科医生劳动力密度(WFD)用于估计手术通路。治疗发生率比(TIR)提供了一种衡量护理可及性的新方法。TIR与普通外科医生WFD的关系尚未得到评估。研究设计:北卡罗来纳州住院患者出院回顾性队列研究(2016-2019)。采用调整后的线性和逻辑回归分析普外科疾病县与医院服务区域(HSA) tir之间的关系。结果调整相关协变量后,县普外科医生WFD和TIR (- 0.0009, 95% CI -0.028,0.026;p 0.95)和HSA普外科WFD和TIR (0.008, 95% CI -0.021,0.037;P 0.58)无统计学意义相关。一个县的几率为0.91 (95% CI 0.42,1.97;p 0.82)或HSA (or 0.93, 95% CI 0.43,2.04;p 0.86),高TIR与WFD无关。结论普通外科医生的WFD与普通外科疾病的特定手术率无关,与HSA水平无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of reintervention rates in mesh versus no-mesh inguinal hernia repair using electronic health records Fungating tumors, forgotten patients The suprapubic pseudosac crochet hook suspension technique in laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: An efficient alternative in pseudosac management Investigating optimal warming techniques for hypothermia in a swine model of ischemia Decreased utilization of component separation techniques over time in complex abdominal wall reconstruction following introduction of preoperative botulinum toxin A
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1