Linking environmental impact assessment and Positive Energy Districts: A literature review

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100264
Rosaria Volpe , Adriano Bisello , Andreas Tuerk , Francesco Guarino , Emanuela Giancola , Maria Nuria Sanchez , Giovanni Tumminia , Elisa Marrasso , Giovanna Pallotta , Emanuele Cutore , Maurizio Cellura , Alberto Fichera , Sonia Longo , Carlo Roselli , Maurizio Sasso , Xiaojin Zhang , Ilaria Marotta , Alberto Brunetti , Roberta Rincione , Francesco Reda
{"title":"Linking environmental impact assessment and Positive Energy Districts: A literature review","authors":"Rosaria Volpe ,&nbsp;Adriano Bisello ,&nbsp;Andreas Tuerk ,&nbsp;Francesco Guarino ,&nbsp;Emanuela Giancola ,&nbsp;Maria Nuria Sanchez ,&nbsp;Giovanni Tumminia ,&nbsp;Elisa Marrasso ,&nbsp;Giovanna Pallotta ,&nbsp;Emanuele Cutore ,&nbsp;Maurizio Cellura ,&nbsp;Alberto Fichera ,&nbsp;Sonia Longo ,&nbsp;Carlo Roselli ,&nbsp;Maurizio Sasso ,&nbsp;Xiaojin Zhang ,&nbsp;Ilaria Marotta ,&nbsp;Alberto Brunetti ,&nbsp;Roberta Rincione ,&nbsp;Francesco Reda","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research delves into the environmental impact assessment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), focusing on comparative analyses of methodologies, key performance indicators, and an array of both theoretical and practical case studies. The literature review uncovers the strengths and weaknesses inherent current evaluation practices. The study reveals critical gaps in current assessment frameworks, particularly regarding the application to PEDs. It highlights the necessity for a holistic approach to PED evaluation, incorporating diverse energy sources and consumption patterns to fully understand their impact. The research advocates for the integration of multiple environmental factors in terms of innovative design and technology in PEDs, tailored to enhance both functionality and sustainability. It calls for the development of standardized guidelines and the learning from successful implementations to ensure the resilience and effectiveness of PEDs over time. Thus, this review paper aims to contribute to the body of knowledge on PEDs, offering insights and recommendations for future developments in this critical area of sustainable urban and energy planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100264"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789425000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research delves into the environmental impact assessment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), focusing on comparative analyses of methodologies, key performance indicators, and an array of both theoretical and practical case studies. The literature review uncovers the strengths and weaknesses inherent current evaluation practices. The study reveals critical gaps in current assessment frameworks, particularly regarding the application to PEDs. It highlights the necessity for a holistic approach to PED evaluation, incorporating diverse energy sources and consumption patterns to fully understand their impact. The research advocates for the integration of multiple environmental factors in terms of innovative design and technology in PEDs, tailored to enhance both functionality and sustainability. It calls for the development of standardized guidelines and the learning from successful implementations to ensure the resilience and effectiveness of PEDs over time. Thus, this review paper aims to contribute to the body of knowledge on PEDs, offering insights and recommendations for future developments in this critical area of sustainable urban and energy planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Implications of environmental constraints and opportunities on livestock production and emissions: New Zealand as a case study Linking environmental impact assessment and Positive Energy Districts: A literature review Gate-to-gate life cycle assessment of lithium-ion battery recycling pre-treatment Assessing greenhouse gas emissions in hospitals: The development of an open-access calculator and its application to a German case-study Life cycle assessment and material flow analysis of road and rail infrastructure assets – A critical review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1