Acceptability and effect on food choices of incentives promoting more sustainable diets among low-income consumers: A qualitative study

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Appetite Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2025.107903
Basile Verdeau , Anaëlle Denieul-Barbot , Sandrine Monnery-Patris
{"title":"Acceptability and effect on food choices of incentives promoting more sustainable diets among low-income consumers: A qualitative study","authors":"Basile Verdeau ,&nbsp;Anaëlle Denieul-Barbot ,&nbsp;Sandrine Monnery-Patris","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.107903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of rising food costs, low-income consumers are likely to lack financial access to a sustainable diet primarily composed of healthy plant-based food. To promote a change towards more sustainable food habits, vouchers for fruit, vegetables and legumes redeemable in supermarkets have been experimented in the urban area of Dijon (France). The objective of the study was to explore the acceptability of the intervention and the effects of the vouchers on food choices through participants’ perceptions. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty-seven participants, three months after the end of the intervention. The transcripts were analysed through inductive then deductive content analysis, following a process evaluation framework with two themes related to the implementation and the mechanisms of impact of the intervention. Implementation issues and feelings of discrimination were mentioned, but satisfaction was high and vouchers were considered to improve the financial situation, although the restriction on the targeted products was not always understood. Regarding the mechanisms of impact, during the intervention period, two third of the participants, especially families with young children, attached greater importance to taste and curiosity for unfamiliar food and lesser importance to price. Vouchers thus led to food purchases of higher diversity and higher enjoyment. Other participants did not change their habits, mostly because of an improper use of the vouchers or the absence of motivation for a dietary change. These findings suggest that financial incentives not only increase access to sustainable food, but also influence food choice processes and contribute to greater acceptability of plant-based food in low-income families. The results call for financial incentives to be considered as an opportunity to support changes in dietary behaviour in low-income populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 107903"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325000558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of rising food costs, low-income consumers are likely to lack financial access to a sustainable diet primarily composed of healthy plant-based food. To promote a change towards more sustainable food habits, vouchers for fruit, vegetables and legumes redeemable in supermarkets have been experimented in the urban area of Dijon (France). The objective of the study was to explore the acceptability of the intervention and the effects of the vouchers on food choices through participants’ perceptions. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty-seven participants, three months after the end of the intervention. The transcripts were analysed through inductive then deductive content analysis, following a process evaluation framework with two themes related to the implementation and the mechanisms of impact of the intervention. Implementation issues and feelings of discrimination were mentioned, but satisfaction was high and vouchers were considered to improve the financial situation, although the restriction on the targeted products was not always understood. Regarding the mechanisms of impact, during the intervention period, two third of the participants, especially families with young children, attached greater importance to taste and curiosity for unfamiliar food and lesser importance to price. Vouchers thus led to food purchases of higher diversity and higher enjoyment. Other participants did not change their habits, mostly because of an improper use of the vouchers or the absence of motivation for a dietary change. These findings suggest that financial incentives not only increase access to sustainable food, but also influence food choice processes and contribute to greater acceptability of plant-based food in low-income families. The results call for financial incentives to be considered as an opportunity to support changes in dietary behaviour in low-income populations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在低收入消费者中,促进更可持续饮食的激励措施对食物选择的可接受性和影响:一项定性研究
在食品成本不断上涨的背景下,低收入消费者可能无法获得主要由健康植物性食品组成的可持续饮食。为了促进向更可持续的饮食习惯转变,在法国第戎市区进行了在超市兑换水果、蔬菜和豆类代金券的试验。本研究的目的是探讨干预的可接受性,以及券对食物选择的影响,通过参与者的感知。在干预结束三个月后,对27名参与者进行了面对面的半结构化访谈。通过归纳和演绎内容分析来分析成绩单,遵循与实施和干预影响机制相关的两个主题的过程评估框架。有人提到了执行问题和歧视的感觉,但满意度很高,人们认为代金券可以改善财务状况,尽管对目标产品的限制并不总是得到理解。在影响机制方面,在干预期间,三分之二的参与者,特别是有幼儿的家庭,对不熟悉的食物更重视味道和好奇心,对价格的重视程度较低。因此,代金券导致了更多样化和更高享受的食品购买。其他参与者没有改变他们的习惯,主要是因为不正确使用代金券或缺乏改变饮食的动力。这些发现表明,财政激励不仅增加了获得可持续食物的机会,而且还影响了食物选择过程,并有助于低收入家庭更容易接受植物性食物。研究结果呼吁将财政激励视为支持低收入人群改变饮食行为的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Energy intake and appetite in laboratory and free-living conditions may be consistent across menstrual cycle phases" [Appetite 216 (2026) 108314]. Corrigendum to "Who do we talk about when we talk about flexitarians?" [Appetite 219 (2025), 1-9 108410]. Identity and Diet: Politics, Religion, Social Class and Vegetarian Diet. Examining social and family contextual differences between parental feeding practice profiles in UK parents of pre-school children. Between disgust and desire: Psychological drivers of attitudes toward offal consumption and the moderating role of gender.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1