Evaluation of crawler cranes for large-scale construction and infrastructure projects: An intuitionistic fuzzy consensus-based approach

IF 10.4 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Industrial Information Integration Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jii.2025.100784
Ömer Faruk Görçün , Abhijit Saha , Fatih Ecer
{"title":"Evaluation of crawler cranes for large-scale construction and infrastructure projects: An intuitionistic fuzzy consensus-based approach","authors":"Ömer Faruk Görçün ,&nbsp;Abhijit Saha ,&nbsp;Fatih Ecer","doi":"10.1016/j.jii.2025.100784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Choosing the proper and best crawler crane is a complicated decision-making issue due to several conflicting criteria and vagueness in the construction and project logistics industries. This decision-making problem has become compounded due to insufficient studies on crawler crane selection in the relevant literature. The current study introduces an intuitionistic fuzzy consensus-based complex proportional assessment model (IF-c-COPRAS) developed to address the existing research gaps and identify the best and most suitable crawler crane. The acquired conclusions revealed that the most potent criterion influencing the crawler crane selection is \"job potential,\" with a weighted score of 0.7665, followed by \"periodic control and inspection\" and \"crane model year.\" Once the following findings of the paper regarding crawler crane variants are evaluated, the crawler crane manufactured by Liebherr Co. is the most feasible alternative, with a relative significance score of 0.8324. These outcomes provide sensible implications and insights for practitioners and decision-makers in the construction and project logistics (overweight/oversized cargo lifting and transport firms) industries, providing an applicable guideline for improving the quality of construction operations. Additionally, crane manufacturers can consider these managerial and policy implications and insights to improve the abilities and quality of the crawler cranes they produce.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Information Integration","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100784"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Information Integration","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452414X25000093","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Choosing the proper and best crawler crane is a complicated decision-making issue due to several conflicting criteria and vagueness in the construction and project logistics industries. This decision-making problem has become compounded due to insufficient studies on crawler crane selection in the relevant literature. The current study introduces an intuitionistic fuzzy consensus-based complex proportional assessment model (IF-c-COPRAS) developed to address the existing research gaps and identify the best and most suitable crawler crane. The acquired conclusions revealed that the most potent criterion influencing the crawler crane selection is "job potential," with a weighted score of 0.7665, followed by "periodic control and inspection" and "crane model year." Once the following findings of the paper regarding crawler crane variants are evaluated, the crawler crane manufactured by Liebherr Co. is the most feasible alternative, with a relative significance score of 0.8324. These outcomes provide sensible implications and insights for practitioners and decision-makers in the construction and project logistics (overweight/oversized cargo lifting and transport firms) industries, providing an applicable guideline for improving the quality of construction operations. Additionally, crane manufacturers can consider these managerial and policy implications and insights to improve the abilities and quality of the crawler cranes they produce.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Information Integration
Journal of Industrial Information Integration Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
13.40%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Information Integration focuses on the industry's transition towards industrial integration and informatization, covering not only hardware and software but also information integration. It serves as a platform for promoting advances in industrial information integration, addressing challenges, issues, and solutions in an interdisciplinary forum for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. The Journal of Industrial Information Integration welcomes papers on foundational, technical, and practical aspects of industrial information integration, emphasizing the complex and cross-disciplinary topics that arise in industrial integration. Techniques from mathematical science, computer science, computer engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, manufacturing engineering, and engineering management are crucial in this context.
期刊最新文献
Human-Centric Green Design for automatic production lines: Using virtual and augmented reality to integrate industrial data and promote sustainability Effects of Lean Tools and Industry 4.0 technology on productivity: An empirical study A novel paradigm on data and knowledge-driven drug formulation development: Opportunities and challenges of machine learning Fuzzy ensemble-based federated learning for EEG-based emotion recognition in Internet of Medical Things Data enabling technology in digital twin and its frameworks in different industrial applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1