Potential cracking resistance indices for the SCB test utilising 100 mm diameter samples: Experimental investigation and machine learning analysis XGBoost-SHAP

IF 5.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS Engineering Fracture Mechanics Pub Date : 2025-03-26 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.110916
Dai Xuan Lu , Thai Son Tran , Mofreh Saleh , Tien V. Nguyen , Ha H. Bui
{"title":"Potential cracking resistance indices for the SCB test utilising 100 mm diameter samples: Experimental investigation and machine learning analysis XGBoost-SHAP","authors":"Dai Xuan Lu ,&nbsp;Thai Son Tran ,&nbsp;Mofreh Saleh ,&nbsp;Tien V. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Ha H. Bui","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.110916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to conduct an extensive and comprehensive investigation of range of potential cracking indexes available in the literature for the SCB test. In contrast to studies on 150 mm diameter SCB samples, this study focused on 100 mm diameter samples. This work is an effort to develop and accommodate SCB tests for specimens with 100 mm diameters prepared by either Marshall or gyratory compaction methods or cores from existing pavements. Four indices were compared and analysed, namely, the flexibility index (<em>FI</em>), cracking resistance index (<em>CRI</em>), cracking tolerance index (<em>SCB</em>-<em>CTI</em>), and rate-dependent cracking index (<em>RDCI</em>). The study used advanced analysis of machine learning (ML) integrating open-source library XGBoost and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) as support tools to analyse the sensitivity of the indexes, providing a clearer picture of the usefulness of each index. The study found that cracking indexes have good correlation to each other’s. Sensitivity analysis with the help of ML shows that <em>CRI</em> is the best choice among the investigated indexes. However, none of the indexes shows appropriate mechanical mechanism of the cracking resistance as lower air void samples provided lower indexes, indicating a room for improvement. Finally, the ML is found a robust technique to help scanning and evaluating the sensitivity analysis when it comes to proposing mechanical indexes for asphalt concrete testing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":"317 ","pages":"Article 110916"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794425001171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to conduct an extensive and comprehensive investigation of range of potential cracking indexes available in the literature for the SCB test. In contrast to studies on 150 mm diameter SCB samples, this study focused on 100 mm diameter samples. This work is an effort to develop and accommodate SCB tests for specimens with 100 mm diameters prepared by either Marshall or gyratory compaction methods or cores from existing pavements. Four indices were compared and analysed, namely, the flexibility index (FI), cracking resistance index (CRI), cracking tolerance index (SCB-CTI), and rate-dependent cracking index (RDCI). The study used advanced analysis of machine learning (ML) integrating open-source library XGBoost and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) as support tools to analyse the sensitivity of the indexes, providing a clearer picture of the usefulness of each index. The study found that cracking indexes have good correlation to each other’s. Sensitivity analysis with the help of ML shows that CRI is the best choice among the investigated indexes. However, none of the indexes shows appropriate mechanical mechanism of the cracking resistance as lower air void samples provided lower indexes, indicating a room for improvement. Finally, the ML is found a robust technique to help scanning and evaluating the sensitivity analysis when it comes to proposing mechanical indexes for asphalt concrete testing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用直径为 100 毫米的样品进行 SCB 试验的潜在抗裂指数:实验研究和机器学习分析 XGBoost-SHAP
本研究旨在对SCB测试中可用的潜在开裂指标范围进行广泛而全面的调查。与150mm直径SCB样品的研究相比,本研究主要关注100mm直径的样品。这项工作是为了开发和适应SCB测试,用马歇尔或旋转压实方法或现有路面的岩心制备直径为100毫米的试样。对弹性指数(FI)、抗裂指数(CRI)、耐裂指数(SCB-CTI)和速率相关开裂指数(RDCI) 4个指标进行了比较分析。该研究使用了机器学习(ML)的高级分析,集成了开源库XGBoost和SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)作为支持工具来分析索引的敏感性,从而更清楚地了解每个索引的有用性。研究发现,各裂缝指标之间具有良好的相关性。基于ML的敏感性分析表明,CRI是研究指标中的最佳选择。然而,这些指标都不能很好地反映出抗裂性的力学机理,孔隙率越低的试样指标越低,表明抗裂性还有提高的空间。最后,在提出沥青混凝土测试的机械指标时,ML被发现是一种强大的技术,可以帮助扫描和评估敏感性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
606
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
期刊最新文献
A unified approach for predicting dynamic plasticity and ductile fracture of 6005 aluminum alloy Complete stress-strain behaviour and limit state in micromechanical anisotropic damage model with microcrack kinking under compression The phase-field model of fracture incorporating Mohr–Coulomb, Mogi–Coulomb, and Hoek–Brown strength surfaces Tailoring interstitial matrix properties for toughness improvement of concrete based on ductile cementitious matrix A 3D peridynamic framework for fracture analysis of heterogeneous materials with random aggregates: application to polymer-cemented crushed stone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1