Assessing effectiveness of intersection conflict warning system on driving performance under obstructed line of sight at unsignalized intersection

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.02.001
Yashasvi Rachakonda, Digvijay S. Pawar
{"title":"Assessing effectiveness of intersection conflict warning system on driving performance under obstructed line of sight at unsignalized intersection","authors":"Yashasvi Rachakonda,&nbsp;Digvijay S. Pawar","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intersection Conflict Warning System (ICWS) is an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) technology that has been recognized as a solution to reduce crashes at unsignalized intersections. It consists of activated warning signs and sensors that detect vehicles approaching an intersection, transmitting a warning signal to potentially conflicting vehicles on other approaches. The current study examines the effect of ICWS on drivers driving performance while approaching an unsignalized intersection under obstructed line of sight. Four scenarios were developed to evaluate the effectiveness of ICWS. Driving performance measures such as mean and standard deviation of speed and deceleration, and driver factors such as age and number of driving days per week were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Furthermore, duration variables such as response time and speed reduction time were modelled using Weibull Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) duration model. The study insights showed statistical differences among the four scenarios for all driving performance measures. The developed model revealed that with activated ICWS, drivers exhibited longer speed reduction times and shorter response times. This implies that with the activated ICWS, drivers managed to respond to the conflicting vehicle beforehand, resulting in less abrupt braking behaviour and collision avoidance at the intersection. The study highlights the significance of ICWS and will assist traffic engineers and road safety authorities in designing and implementing ICWS at unsignalized intersections in developing world traffic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"110 ","pages":"Pages 128-147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intersection Conflict Warning System (ICWS) is an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) technology that has been recognized as a solution to reduce crashes at unsignalized intersections. It consists of activated warning signs and sensors that detect vehicles approaching an intersection, transmitting a warning signal to potentially conflicting vehicles on other approaches. The current study examines the effect of ICWS on drivers driving performance while approaching an unsignalized intersection under obstructed line of sight. Four scenarios were developed to evaluate the effectiveness of ICWS. Driving performance measures such as mean and standard deviation of speed and deceleration, and driver factors such as age and number of driving days per week were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Furthermore, duration variables such as response time and speed reduction time were modelled using Weibull Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) duration model. The study insights showed statistical differences among the four scenarios for all driving performance measures. The developed model revealed that with activated ICWS, drivers exhibited longer speed reduction times and shorter response times. This implies that with the activated ICWS, drivers managed to respond to the conflicting vehicle beforehand, resulting in less abrupt braking behaviour and collision avoidance at the intersection. The study highlights the significance of ICWS and will assist traffic engineers and road safety authorities in designing and implementing ICWS at unsignalized intersections in developing world traffic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Biosignal-based attention monitoring for evaluating train driver safety-relevant tasks Evaluating the effects of brake light flicker frequency on cognitive conspicuity during visual dark adaptation: A 360-degree simulated driving study Factors influencing car owners’ intentions of using shared cars: An extension of the theory of planned behavior in China Understanding the non-users’ acceptability of autonomous vehicle hailing services using SEM-ANN-NCA approach How encounter timing affects the impact of eHMI on surrounding drivers during automated truck merging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1