Bridging the gaps in sustainability assessment: A systematic literature review, 2014–2023

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation and Program Planning Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102557
Mita Marra
{"title":"Bridging the gaps in sustainability assessment: A systematic literature review, 2014–2023","authors":"Mita Marra","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article highlights recurrent themes and research communities in Sustainability Assessment (SA), a rapidly growing trans-disciplinary area particularly relevant to the global evaluation community. This bibliometric analysis signals the emergence of a substantial research community based in Asia and the Middle East, whose production is distinct from North American and European-centric evaluation studies. While the latter primarily address methodological challenges related to sustainability issues in social policy, organizational capacity building, and public health, the broader SA literature centers on life-cycle assessments to integrate the analysis of environmental and socioeconomic effects in such domains as biodiversity, energy efficiency, urban planning, alternative agriculture, and supply chain management. This mapping exercise highlights the global distribution of research output and identifies existing gaps and potential future cross-fertilization. The transdisciplinary SA literature can draw from theory-based designs attuned to complexity and systems thinking. Policy analysts and evaluators can gain insights from diverse SA perspectives and policy approaches to tackle sustainability challenges more systematically.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 102557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article highlights recurrent themes and research communities in Sustainability Assessment (SA), a rapidly growing trans-disciplinary area particularly relevant to the global evaluation community. This bibliometric analysis signals the emergence of a substantial research community based in Asia and the Middle East, whose production is distinct from North American and European-centric evaluation studies. While the latter primarily address methodological challenges related to sustainability issues in social policy, organizational capacity building, and public health, the broader SA literature centers on life-cycle assessments to integrate the analysis of environmental and socioeconomic effects in such domains as biodiversity, energy efficiency, urban planning, alternative agriculture, and supply chain management. This mapping exercise highlights the global distribution of research output and identifies existing gaps and potential future cross-fertilization. The transdisciplinary SA literature can draw from theory-based designs attuned to complexity and systems thinking. Policy analysts and evaluators can gain insights from diverse SA perspectives and policy approaches to tackle sustainability challenges more systematically.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2014-2023年可持续发展评估的系统文献综述
本文重点介绍了可持续发展评估(SA)中反复出现的主题和研究社区,这是一个快速发展的跨学科领域,与全球评估社区特别相关。这种文献计量分析标志着亚洲和中东出现了一个实质性的研究团体,其成果不同于以北美和欧洲为中心的评价研究。虽然后者主要解决与社会政策、组织能力建设和公共卫生方面的可持续性问题相关的方法挑战,但更广泛的SA文献集中在生命周期评估上,以整合生物多样性、能源效率、城市规划、替代农业和供应链管理等领域的环境和社会经济影响分析。这项测绘工作突出了研究成果的全球分布,并确定了现有的差距和未来可能的相互作用。跨学科的SA文献可以借鉴基于理论的设计,以适应复杂性和系统思维。政策分析人员和评估人员可以从不同的可持续发展视角和政策方法中获得见解,从而更系统地应对可持续性挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
期刊最新文献
Implementation fidelity of a sport-based positive youth development program designed to teach sport and social skills Lessons learned from a collective evaluation and community of practice focused on evidence-based learning Evaluation policies in international non-governmental humanitarian organisations From needs to dreams: An aspiration-based community needs assessment methodology From strategy to evaluation: A social determinants of healthy campus framework for evaluating U.S. campus health programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1