Occupational stress, burnout, and change fatigue as predictors of quiet quitting among teachers

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104812
Ümit Dilekçi , Ayça Kaya , İlhan Çiçek
{"title":"Occupational stress, burnout, and change fatigue as predictors of quiet quitting among teachers","authors":"Ümit Dilekçi ,&nbsp;Ayça Kaya ,&nbsp;İlhan Çiçek","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the effects of occupational stress, burnout, and change fatigue on quiet quitting among teachers. The study adopted a cross-sectional design and hierarchical regression analysis. The sample was reached through convenience sampling method and included 366 teachers (185 male [50.5 %] and 181 female) aged between 21 and 59 years (M = 36.25, SD = 6.13). Data were collected using the <em>Quiet Quitting Scale</em> (QQS), <em>Perceived Occupational Stress Scale</em> (POSS), <em>Job-Related Emotional Exhaustion Scale</em> (J-REES), <em>Change Fatigue Scale</em> (CFS), and a demographics information form. The analysis was conducted on the SPSS 25. The findings suggested positive and significant relationships among occupational stress, burnout, change fatigue, and quiet quitting. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that occupational stress, burnout, and change fatigue explained 35 % of the variance in quiet quitting. The findings also suggested that higher levels of occupational stress, burnout, and change fatigue significantly and positively influenced quiet quitting, identifying them as its predictors. These findings highlight the significance of implementing programs and interventions to reduce occupational stress, burnout, and change fatigue among teachers and mitigate quiet quitting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 104812"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825001258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of occupational stress, burnout, and change fatigue on quiet quitting among teachers. The study adopted a cross-sectional design and hierarchical regression analysis. The sample was reached through convenience sampling method and included 366 teachers (185 male [50.5 %] and 181 female) aged between 21 and 59 years (M = 36.25, SD = 6.13). Data were collected using the Quiet Quitting Scale (QQS), Perceived Occupational Stress Scale (POSS), Job-Related Emotional Exhaustion Scale (J-REES), Change Fatigue Scale (CFS), and a demographics information form. The analysis was conducted on the SPSS 25. The findings suggested positive and significant relationships among occupational stress, burnout, change fatigue, and quiet quitting. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that occupational stress, burnout, and change fatigue explained 35 % of the variance in quiet quitting. The findings also suggested that higher levels of occupational stress, burnout, and change fatigue significantly and positively influenced quiet quitting, identifying them as its predictors. These findings highlight the significance of implementing programs and interventions to reduce occupational stress, burnout, and change fatigue among teachers and mitigate quiet quitting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业压力、职业倦怠和变化疲劳是教师安静辞职的预测因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Leadership, institutional autonomy, and cross-sector collaboration: Catalysts for change in a survey of China's public sector employees When giving social support is beneficial for well-being? Differentiation and integration: The addressee perspective-taking strategy in three-party conversation Autonomy and risk perception in Congo Basin developmental systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1