Innovative resources driven artificial intelligence orientation: The moderating role of environmental and executives’ characteristics

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Technology in Society Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102837
Wucheng Han , Weijie Zhu , Zhaoli Song , Ruoyu Lu
{"title":"Innovative resources driven artificial intelligence orientation: The moderating role of environmental and executives’ characteristics","authors":"Wucheng Han ,&nbsp;Weijie Zhu ,&nbsp;Zhaoli Song ,&nbsp;Ruoyu Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the era of rapid artificial intelligence (AI) technology advancement, enterprises increasingly consider AI as a strategic imperative. However, the determinants of AI adoption and strategy formulation in enterprises remain elusive. Drawing on an integrated Resource-Based View (RBV) and Strategic Choice Theory (SCT) framework, this study presents a theoretical model that scrutinizes the factors and boundary conditions influencing enterprises in crafting AI strategies. Empirical assessments of theoretical hypotheses were conducted utilizing survey data gathered from 717 executives across global firms. We found strong evidence that internal innovation resources (IIR) and collaborative innovation networks (CIN) have a positive impact on firm's AI orientation. The study revealed that environmental uncertainty (EU) can negatively moderate the relationship between internal innovation resources, collaborative innovation networks, and AI orientation. A positive moderating effect was observed between corporate digital culture (DC) and the relationship between internal innovation resources, collaborative innovation networks, and AI orientation. Meanwhile, we found a positive moderating effect of Executives' Not-Invented-Here Syndrome (NIHS) on the relationship between internal innovation resources and AI orientation. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on AI strategy in management and offers valuable guidance for organizations seeking to harness the potential of AI in a rapidly changing business environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102837"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000272","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the era of rapid artificial intelligence (AI) technology advancement, enterprises increasingly consider AI as a strategic imperative. However, the determinants of AI adoption and strategy formulation in enterprises remain elusive. Drawing on an integrated Resource-Based View (RBV) and Strategic Choice Theory (SCT) framework, this study presents a theoretical model that scrutinizes the factors and boundary conditions influencing enterprises in crafting AI strategies. Empirical assessments of theoretical hypotheses were conducted utilizing survey data gathered from 717 executives across global firms. We found strong evidence that internal innovation resources (IIR) and collaborative innovation networks (CIN) have a positive impact on firm's AI orientation. The study revealed that environmental uncertainty (EU) can negatively moderate the relationship between internal innovation resources, collaborative innovation networks, and AI orientation. A positive moderating effect was observed between corporate digital culture (DC) and the relationship between internal innovation resources, collaborative innovation networks, and AI orientation. Meanwhile, we found a positive moderating effect of Executives' Not-Invented-Here Syndrome (NIHS) on the relationship between internal innovation resources and AI orientation. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on AI strategy in management and offers valuable guidance for organizations seeking to harness the potential of AI in a rapidly changing business environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新资源驱动人工智能导向:环境和管理人员特征的调节作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
期刊最新文献
The impact of circular economy, sustainable infrastructure, and green FinTech on biodiversity in Europe: A holistic approach Assessing the ecology of cluster-based enterprise trust networks through percolation theory: Is your business environment trustworthy? Designing engagement: Exploring affordances in freemium digital games Innovative resources driven artificial intelligence orientation: The moderating role of environmental and executives’ characteristics The ethics of generative AI in social science research: A qualitative approach for institutionally grounded AI research ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1