Capital regulation, regulatory avoidance, and bank systemic risk

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104002
Wenlong Miao, Yuxian Ma, Haoran Xu
{"title":"Capital regulation, regulatory avoidance, and bank systemic risk","authors":"Wenlong Miao,&nbsp;Yuxian Ma,&nbsp;Haoran Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Capital regulation is a core measure of modern financial regulation, but banks' regulatory avoidance behavior may affect the control effect of capital regulation on systemic risk. This study evaluates the control effect of capital regulation on bank systemic risk from the perspective of regulatory avoidance. We employ sample data from 42 Chinese listed banks from 2013 to 2023. The results reveal that as capital regulatory standards are improved, the impact of capital regulation on bank systemic risk changes from a suppressive effect to an exacerbating effect, and there is a ‘U-shaped’ relationship between the two. This impact is related to regulatory evasion behavior. The higher the capital regulatory standards, the greater the degree of bank regulatory evasion, and the weaker the control effect of capital regulation on bank systemic risk. Furthermore, this study investigates the mechanism by which capital regulation affects bank systemic risk. The results reveal that the cost compensation effect, risk correlation effect, and loss aggravation effect will all positively regulate the impact of capital supervision on bank systemic risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 104002"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925000894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Capital regulation is a core measure of modern financial regulation, but banks' regulatory avoidance behavior may affect the control effect of capital regulation on systemic risk. This study evaluates the control effect of capital regulation on bank systemic risk from the perspective of regulatory avoidance. We employ sample data from 42 Chinese listed banks from 2013 to 2023. The results reveal that as capital regulatory standards are improved, the impact of capital regulation on bank systemic risk changes from a suppressive effect to an exacerbating effect, and there is a ‘U-shaped’ relationship between the two. This impact is related to regulatory evasion behavior. The higher the capital regulatory standards, the greater the degree of bank regulatory evasion, and the weaker the control effect of capital regulation on bank systemic risk. Furthermore, this study investigates the mechanism by which capital regulation affects bank systemic risk. The results reveal that the cost compensation effect, risk correlation effect, and loss aggravation effect will all positively regulate the impact of capital supervision on bank systemic risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资本监管、监管规避与银行系统性风险
资本监管是现代金融监管的核心措施,但银行的监管规避行为可能会影响资本监管对系统风险的控制效果。本研究从监管规避的角度评价资本监管对银行系统性风险的控制效果。我们采用了42家中国上市银行2013 - 2023年的样本数据。结果表明,随着资本监管标准的提高,资本监管对银行系统性风险的影响由抑制效应向加剧效应转变,二者呈“u”型关系。这种影响与监管规避行为有关。资本监管标准越高,银行规避监管的程度越大,资本监管对银行系统性风险的控制效果越弱。此外,本文还探讨了资本监管对银行系统性风险的影响机制。结果表明,成本补偿效应、风险关联效应和损失加剧效应都将正向调节资本监管对银行系统性风险的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Energy price shocks and inflation: The cross-country comparison of energy price management systems ESG expertise and analysts' roles in capital markets Carbon performance and CDS spreads: Unveiling the role of governance mechanisms in shaping dynamic distress risk Data assetization and audit fees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1