Unmasking camouflage: exploring the challenges of large language models in deciphering African American language & online performativity

Shana Kleiner, Jessica A. Grieser, Shug Miller, James Shepard, Javier Garcia-Perez, Nick Deas, Desmond U. Patton, Elsbeth Turcan, Kathleen McKeown
{"title":"Unmasking camouflage: exploring the challenges of large language models in deciphering African American language & online performativity","authors":"Shana Kleiner,&nbsp;Jessica A. Grieser,&nbsp;Shug Miller,&nbsp;James Shepard,&nbsp;Javier Garcia-Perez,&nbsp;Nick Deas,&nbsp;Desmond U. Patton,&nbsp;Elsbeth Turcan,&nbsp;Kathleen McKeown","doi":"10.1007/s43681-024-00623-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The growing accessibility of large language models (LLMs) has raised many questions about the reliability of probabilistically generated natural language responses. While researchers have documented how bias in the training data leads to biased and ethically problematic output, little attention has been paid to the problems which arise from the nature of the varieties of language on which these models are trained. In particular, certain kinds of expressive and performative language use are more common among African American social media users than they occur in the naturalistic speech of African Americans, a discrepancy which models may fail to take into account when they are training on easily-scraped data as being representative of African American speech. Because LLM training data is generally proprietary, in this work we simulate the training data using a collected dataset consisting of 274 posts from Twitter, Reddit, and Hip-Hop lyrics and analyze how LLMs interpreted their meaning. We highlight the difficulties LLMs, including GPT-3 and GPT-4, have in understanding performative AAL and examine how camouflaging and performativity are addressed (or not) by LLMs and demonstrate the harmful implications of misinterpreting online performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 1","pages":"29 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-024-00623-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-024-00623-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing accessibility of large language models (LLMs) has raised many questions about the reliability of probabilistically generated natural language responses. While researchers have documented how bias in the training data leads to biased and ethically problematic output, little attention has been paid to the problems which arise from the nature of the varieties of language on which these models are trained. In particular, certain kinds of expressive and performative language use are more common among African American social media users than they occur in the naturalistic speech of African Americans, a discrepancy which models may fail to take into account when they are training on easily-scraped data as being representative of African American speech. Because LLM training data is generally proprietary, in this work we simulate the training data using a collected dataset consisting of 274 posts from Twitter, Reddit, and Hip-Hop lyrics and analyze how LLMs interpreted their meaning. We highlight the difficulties LLMs, including GPT-3 and GPT-4, have in understanding performative AAL and examine how camouflaging and performativity are addressed (or not) by LLMs and demonstrate the harmful implications of misinterpreting online performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭开伪装:探索大型语言模型在破译非裔美国人语言和在线表演方面的挑战
随着大型语言模型(llm)的日益普及,人们对概率生成的自然语言响应的可靠性提出了许多问题。虽然研究人员已经记录了训练数据中的偏见如何导致有偏见和道德问题的输出,但很少有人注意到这些模型所训练的语言种类的性质所产生的问题。特别是,某些类型的表达性和表演性语言使用在非裔美国人社交媒体用户中比在非裔美国人的自然语言中更常见,这一差异可能是模型在训练时没有考虑到的,因为它们很容易收集数据,作为非裔美国人语言的代表。由于法学硕士训练数据通常是专有的,在这项工作中,我们使用收集的数据集来模拟训练数据,该数据集由来自Twitter、Reddit和Hip-Hop歌词的274个帖子组成,并分析法学硕士如何解释其含义。我们强调了法学硕士(包括GPT-3和GPT-4)在理解表演性AAL方面的困难,并研究了法学硕士如何解决(或不解决)伪装和表演性,并展示了误解在线表现的有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
aiHumanoid v11.9: a large concept model for autonomous ethical reasoning in clinical AI Towards a clinical large language model: an ethico-legal case study analysis A lacanian re-reading of sex robots: human subjectivity and programmable compliance on desire Culturally contextual datasheets: a framework for embedding cultural reflexivity in global AI governance AI Trustworthiness Index for Healthcare (AITI-H): conceptualization, structure, and development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1