Unmasking camouflage: exploring the challenges of large language models in deciphering African American language & online performativity

Shana Kleiner, Jessica A. Grieser, Shug Miller, James Shepard, Javier Garcia-Perez, Nick Deas, Desmond U. Patton, Elsbeth Turcan, Kathleen McKeown
{"title":"Unmasking camouflage: exploring the challenges of large language models in deciphering African American language & online performativity","authors":"Shana Kleiner,&nbsp;Jessica A. Grieser,&nbsp;Shug Miller,&nbsp;James Shepard,&nbsp;Javier Garcia-Perez,&nbsp;Nick Deas,&nbsp;Desmond U. Patton,&nbsp;Elsbeth Turcan,&nbsp;Kathleen McKeown","doi":"10.1007/s43681-024-00623-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The growing accessibility of large language models (LLMs) has raised many questions about the reliability of probabilistically generated natural language responses. While researchers have documented how bias in the training data leads to biased and ethically problematic output, little attention has been paid to the problems which arise from the nature of the varieties of language on which these models are trained. In particular, certain kinds of expressive and performative language use are more common among African American social media users than they occur in the naturalistic speech of African Americans, a discrepancy which models may fail to take into account when they are training on easily-scraped data as being representative of African American speech. Because LLM training data is generally proprietary, in this work we simulate the training data using a collected dataset consisting of 274 posts from Twitter, Reddit, and Hip-Hop lyrics and analyze how LLMs interpreted their meaning. We highlight the difficulties LLMs, including GPT-3 and GPT-4, have in understanding performative AAL and examine how camouflaging and performativity are addressed (or not) by LLMs and demonstrate the harmful implications of misinterpreting online performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 1","pages":"29 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-024-00623-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-024-00623-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing accessibility of large language models (LLMs) has raised many questions about the reliability of probabilistically generated natural language responses. While researchers have documented how bias in the training data leads to biased and ethically problematic output, little attention has been paid to the problems which arise from the nature of the varieties of language on which these models are trained. In particular, certain kinds of expressive and performative language use are more common among African American social media users than they occur in the naturalistic speech of African Americans, a discrepancy which models may fail to take into account when they are training on easily-scraped data as being representative of African American speech. Because LLM training data is generally proprietary, in this work we simulate the training data using a collected dataset consisting of 274 posts from Twitter, Reddit, and Hip-Hop lyrics and analyze how LLMs interpreted their meaning. We highlight the difficulties LLMs, including GPT-3 and GPT-4, have in understanding performative AAL and examine how camouflaging and performativity are addressed (or not) by LLMs and demonstrate the harmful implications of misinterpreting online performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the mutations of society in the era of generative AI The need for an empirical research program regarding human–AI relational norms AI to renew public employment services? Explanation and trust of domain experts Waging warfare against states: the deployment of artificial intelligence in cyber espionage Technology, liberty, and guardrails
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1