A User-Customizable Hybrid Framework for Targeted Medical Decision-Making

IF 2.4 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1002/mcda.70007
M. Gabriela Sava, Luis G. Vargas, Jerrold H. May, Linda Limeri, James G. Dolan
{"title":"A User-Customizable Hybrid Framework for Targeted Medical Decision-Making","authors":"M. Gabriela Sava,&nbsp;Luis G. Vargas,&nbsp;Jerrold H. May,&nbsp;Linda Limeri,&nbsp;James G. Dolan","doi":"10.1002/mcda.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Targeted medical decision-making is a current strategy for addressing the heterogeneity in the patient population, especially when patients' preferences are included in the decision-making process. In this paper, we propose a user-customizable hybrid framework that can be adjusted at the patient group level to target a medical decision process. Our framework provides a flexible design, capable of balancing the gain from the reduction of provider time against the cost of prediction inaccuracy resulting from group customization. The framework combines a descriptive process, used to group the patients based on preference-based subjective features, with a predictive process, which uses objective features to match a new patient with a group. We illustrate our approach by applying it to the colorectal cancer-screening problem. The provider chooses what level of trade-off is appropriate, as a function of the acceptable error level. The group customization process allows decision makers to better allocate scarce resources, by potentially shortening the time-consuming process of modelling patients' preferences using individualised stability analysis. The proposed framework might be applied, with minor changes, to various medical decisions, or even to broader provider-user scenarios, in which targeted decision-making that includes user preferences is advantageous.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.70007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Targeted medical decision-making is a current strategy for addressing the heterogeneity in the patient population, especially when patients' preferences are included in the decision-making process. In this paper, we propose a user-customizable hybrid framework that can be adjusted at the patient group level to target a medical decision process. Our framework provides a flexible design, capable of balancing the gain from the reduction of provider time against the cost of prediction inaccuracy resulting from group customization. The framework combines a descriptive process, used to group the patients based on preference-based subjective features, with a predictive process, which uses objective features to match a new patient with a group. We illustrate our approach by applying it to the colorectal cancer-screening problem. The provider chooses what level of trade-off is appropriate, as a function of the acceptable error level. The group customization process allows decision makers to better allocate scarce resources, by potentially shortening the time-consuming process of modelling patients' preferences using individualised stability analysis. The proposed framework might be applied, with minor changes, to various medical decisions, or even to broader provider-user scenarios, in which targeted decision-making that includes user preferences is advantageous.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目标医疗决策的用户可定制混合框架
有针对性的医疗决策是解决患者群体异质性的当前策略,特别是当患者的偏好被纳入决策过程时。在本文中,我们提出了一个用户可定制的混合框架,可以在患者群体层面进行调整,以针对医疗决策过程。我们的框架提供了一种灵活的设计,能够在减少提供者时间带来的收益与组定制导致的预测不准确成本之间取得平衡。该框架结合了描述性过程和预测性过程,前者用于基于偏好的主观特征对患者进行分组,后者使用客观特征将新患者与组进行匹配。我们通过将其应用于结直肠癌筛查问题来说明我们的方法。提供者根据可接受的错误级别选择合适的交换级别。群体定制过程允许决策者更好地分配稀缺资源,通过潜在地缩短耗时的过程,模拟患者的偏好,使用个性化的稳定性分析。建议的框架可以在稍加改动的情况下应用于各种医疗决策,甚至应用于更广泛的提供者-用户情景,在这种情况下,包括用户偏好在内的有针对性的决策是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis was launched in 1992, and from the outset has aimed to be the repository of choice for papers covering all aspects of MCDA/MCDM. The journal provides an international forum for the presentation and discussion of all aspects of research, application and evaluation of multi-criteria decision analysis, and publishes material from a variety of disciplines and all schools of thought. Papers addressing mathematical, theoretical, and behavioural aspects are welcome, as are case studies, applications and evaluation of techniques and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A Trend Analysis of Rank Reversal in Widely Used Decision-Making Methods Do Inconsistency Indices Measure Inconsistency of Preferences? Scenario-Focused Decision Analysis: Discussion and Research Questions On Supportedness in Multi-Objective Integer Linear Programming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1