The use of magnification in endodontic treatments by endodontists: results of a questionnaire.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05599-x
Gülsen Kiraz, Ayşe İbiloğlu, Arzu Kaya Mumcu, Safa Kurnaz
{"title":"The use of magnification in endodontic treatments by endodontists: results of a questionnaire.","authors":"Gülsen Kiraz, Ayşe İbiloğlu, Arzu Kaya Mumcu, Safa Kurnaz","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05599-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study to investigate the accessibility and frequency of use of magnification systems in endodontics and to evaluate the economic and logistical factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey comprising of 34 questions, created in Survey Monkey, was sent to 874 clinicians. The survey consisted of three main sections: demographic information, the use of magnification systems, and financial factors. Descriptive analysis and chi-square tests were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 42.3% were endodontists, and 57.7% were postgraduate students in endodontics. Nearly 26.1%, 32.7%, and 41.1% reported using a dental operating microscope (DOM), a loupe, and no magnification system, respectively. When asked how long it would take to recoup the cost of the DOM, considering additional charges or patient preferences, the most common response (40%) was 1-2 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the use of magnification systems has become quite widespread today, it is important to increase their use further. The procurement and use of DOMs have not created a long-term financial burden for clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"242"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05599-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study to investigate the accessibility and frequency of use of magnification systems in endodontics and to evaluate the economic and logistical factors.

Methods: A survey comprising of 34 questions, created in Survey Monkey, was sent to 874 clinicians. The survey consisted of three main sections: demographic information, the use of magnification systems, and financial factors. Descriptive analysis and chi-square tests were performed.

Results: Of the participants, 42.3% were endodontists, and 57.7% were postgraduate students in endodontics. Nearly 26.1%, 32.7%, and 41.1% reported using a dental operating microscope (DOM), a loupe, and no magnification system, respectively. When asked how long it would take to recoup the cost of the DOM, considering additional charges or patient preferences, the most common response (40%) was 1-2 years.

Conclusion: Although the use of magnification systems has become quite widespread today, it is important to increase their use further. The procurement and use of DOMs have not created a long-term financial burden for clinicians.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙髓医生在牙髓治疗中使用放大镜:调查问卷的结果。
背景:本研究的目的是调查牙髓学中使用放大系统的可及性和频率,并评估经济和后勤因素。方法:在survey Monkey中创建一份包含34个问题的调查问卷,向874名临床医生发送。调查包括三个主要部分:人口统计资料、使用放大系统和财务因素。进行描述性分析和卡方检验。结果:参与者中,牙髓医生占42.3%,牙髓学研究生占57.7%。分别有26.1%、32.7%和41.1%的患者报告使用牙科操作显微镜(DOM)、放大镜和无放大系统。当被问及需要多长时间才能收回DOM的成本时,考虑到额外的费用或患者的偏好,最常见的回答(40%)是1-2年。结论:虽然今天使用的放大系统已经相当普遍,重要的是进一步增加其使用。DOMs的采购和使用并未给临床医生造成长期的经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of tooth wear with intraoral scanned models in young adults. Survey of Norwegian orthodontists on the use of temporary anchorage devices. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and periodontitis in non-smokers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect of Dual Rinse HEDP on the push-out bond strength of AH Plus and AH Plus Bioceramic sealers: an in vitro study. Vertical marginal fit of advanced lithium disilicate crowns: an in- vitro study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1