An exploratory study of electronic medical record implementation and recordkeeping culture: the case of hospitals in Indonesia.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12399-0
Md Khalid Hossain, Juliana Sutanto, Putu Wuri Handayani, Anasthasia Agnes Haryanto, Joy Bhowmik, Viviane Frings-Hessami
{"title":"An exploratory study of electronic medical record implementation and recordkeeping culture: the case of hospitals in Indonesia.","authors":"Md Khalid Hossain, Juliana Sutanto, Putu Wuri Handayani, Anasthasia Agnes Haryanto, Joy Bhowmik, Viviane Frings-Hessami","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12399-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The digitization of healthcare, through electronic medical records (EMRs), is recognized globally as a transformative initiative. Indonesia mandated all healthcare facilities to adopt EMRs by December 31, 2023. However, this transition is complicated by diverse technological, cultural, and infrastructural challenges, with little research addressing the recordkeeping culture's impact on EMR adoption. This study investigates the electronic recordkeeping culture in Indonesian hospitals following a government mandate to adopt Electronic Medical Records (EMRs). It aims to understand the readiness and challenges in implementing EMRs across hospitals on Java and Sulawesi islands, focusing on infrastructure, staff digital skills, and varied adoption approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative case study approach was utilized, involving focus groups and semi-structured interviews with 150 staff from 12 hospitals. Conducted between November 2023 and June 2024, the study applied thematic analysis based on Oliver and Foscarini's (2020) recordkeeping culture framework to explore organizational readiness, technological infrastructure, and healthcare professionals' skills in managing electronic records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings reveal significant differences in EMR adoption between the islands. Hospitals on Java exhibited proactive engagement, supported by better technological infrastructure and staff training programs, while Sulawesi hospitals adopted EMRs primarily to meet regulatory requirements. Challenges included inconsistent internet connectivity, low digital literacy among staff, and ongoing reliance on paper records during the transition. Some Java hospitals have begun fostering a culture conducive to electronic recordkeeping by focusing on developing staff skills in EMR management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The effectiveness of EMR adoption in Indonesia relies on addressing technological infrastructure issues and enhancing staff digital literacy. While progress has been made, particularly in more developed regions, a cohesive national strategy emphasizing technological support and targeted training is essential to fully realize the benefits of EMRs in improving healthcare and recordkeeping standards across Indonesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"249"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12399-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The digitization of healthcare, through electronic medical records (EMRs), is recognized globally as a transformative initiative. Indonesia mandated all healthcare facilities to adopt EMRs by December 31, 2023. However, this transition is complicated by diverse technological, cultural, and infrastructural challenges, with little research addressing the recordkeeping culture's impact on EMR adoption. This study investigates the electronic recordkeeping culture in Indonesian hospitals following a government mandate to adopt Electronic Medical Records (EMRs). It aims to understand the readiness and challenges in implementing EMRs across hospitals on Java and Sulawesi islands, focusing on infrastructure, staff digital skills, and varied adoption approaches.

Methods: A qualitative case study approach was utilized, involving focus groups and semi-structured interviews with 150 staff from 12 hospitals. Conducted between November 2023 and June 2024, the study applied thematic analysis based on Oliver and Foscarini's (2020) recordkeeping culture framework to explore organizational readiness, technological infrastructure, and healthcare professionals' skills in managing electronic records.

Results: The findings reveal significant differences in EMR adoption between the islands. Hospitals on Java exhibited proactive engagement, supported by better technological infrastructure and staff training programs, while Sulawesi hospitals adopted EMRs primarily to meet regulatory requirements. Challenges included inconsistent internet connectivity, low digital literacy among staff, and ongoing reliance on paper records during the transition. Some Java hospitals have begun fostering a culture conducive to electronic recordkeeping by focusing on developing staff skills in EMR management.

Conclusions: The effectiveness of EMR adoption in Indonesia relies on addressing technological infrastructure issues and enhancing staff digital literacy. While progress has been made, particularly in more developed regions, a cohesive national strategy emphasizing technological support and targeted training is essential to fully realize the benefits of EMRs in improving healthcare and recordkeeping standards across Indonesia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子病历实施与病历保存文化的探索性研究:以印尼医院为例。
背景:通过电子病历(EMRs)实现医疗保健数字化,是全球公认的一项变革举措。印度尼西亚要求所有医疗机构在2023年12月31日前采用电子病历。然而,这种转变由于各种技术、文化和基础设施的挑战而变得复杂,很少有研究解决记录保存文化对电子病历采用的影响。本研究调查了印尼医院在政府授权采用电子医疗记录(EMRs)后的电子记录保存文化。它旨在了解爪哇岛和苏拉威西岛各医院在实施电子病历方面的准备情况和面临的挑战,重点关注基础设施、员工数字技能和各种采用方法。方法:采用定性案例研究方法,对来自12家医院的150名工作人员进行焦点小组和半结构化访谈。该研究于2023年11月至2024年6月期间进行,基于Oliver和Foscarini(2020)的记录保存文化框架,应用主题分析来探索组织准备情况、技术基础设施和医疗保健专业人员管理电子记录的技能。结果:研究结果揭示了岛屿之间电子病历采用的显着差异。爪哇岛的医院在更好的技术基础设施和员工培训方案的支持下积极参与,而苏拉威西岛的医院采用电子病历主要是为了满足监管要求。面临的挑战包括互联网连接不稳定、工作人员的数字素养较低以及在过渡期间持续依赖纸质记录。一些爪哇医院已经开始培养一种有利于电子病历保存的文化,重点是培养员工在电子病历管理方面的技能。结论:印度尼西亚电子病历采用的有效性取决于解决技术基础设施问题和提高员工数字素养。虽然取得了进展,特别是在较发达地区,但要充分发挥电子病历在提高印度尼西亚各地医疗保健和记录保存标准方面的好处,必须制定一项强调技术支持和有针对性培训的统一国家战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
National trends in the prevalence of dementia in Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare. Lean practice implementation in French healthcare: a longitudinal case study. Predicting high-cost healthcare users: development and external validation of multivariable models using the HUNT and Tromsø studies linked to Norwegian health registries. Exploring how patient involvement is enacted in the Swedish national system for knowledge-driven management - "work as imagined and work as done". The low data fidelity of human-based informatics in surgical instrument waste reduction: is it time for objective computer vision integration?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1