Rideshare services for transportation assistance in gynecologic oncology: a quality improvement study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12296-6
Anna Jo Smith, Sam Pancoe, Mary Pat Lynch, Megan Wachlin, Kristina Powell, Stefanie N Hinkle, Nathanael C Koelper, Meredith Doherty, Justin E Bekelman, Fiona Simpkins, Emily M Ko
{"title":"Rideshare services for transportation assistance in gynecologic oncology: a quality improvement study.","authors":"Anna Jo Smith, Sam Pancoe, Mary Pat Lynch, Megan Wachlin, Kristina Powell, Stefanie N Hinkle, Nathanael C Koelper, Meredith Doherty, Justin E Bekelman, Fiona Simpkins, Emily M Ko","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12296-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transportation barriers can lead to delays in care and suboptimal treatment. Our objective was to assess the utilization of a novel transportation pilot intervention in gynecologic oncology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Since May 2022, we have provided donor-funded transportation to patients receiving gynecologic cancer treatment at 5 University of Pennsylvania practices. Patients are screened for transportation barriers at first visit and re-screened during care. Patients who screen positive are referred to the intervention, a HIPAA-compliant ride-sharing service. There are no income or insurance restrictions; distance was limited to 25 miles. We report descriptive statistics on ride completion, distance traveled, and cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 15-month pilot, 133 of 4,376 patients (3%) screened positive, and 48 (1%) patients received rides. Of 85 patients who screened positive, but did not receive ride-sharing, 43 (51%) had transportation assistance through their insurance, 12 (14%) lived more than 25 miles away, and the remainder (30; 35%) identified alternative transportation. Patients who received transportation assistance were more likely to be older, self-identify as a race other than white, have Medicare or Medicaid insurance, and have a higher ECOG score than the overall patient population. Eight patients received a single ride, and the rest (n = 40) received multiple rides (range 2-30) for total of 417 rides. The mean time via ride-sharing was 19.5 min shorter than public transportation, and mean cost of a one-way trip was $25.75 (range $13.83-129.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A rideshare service served a socially-vulnerable population and reduced commute times to oncology visits, which may contribute to more equitable access to cancer care. Further research on clinical outcomes is needed to understand the impact of transportation assistance on equitable cancer care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"251"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12296-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Transportation barriers can lead to delays in care and suboptimal treatment. Our objective was to assess the utilization of a novel transportation pilot intervention in gynecologic oncology.

Methods: Since May 2022, we have provided donor-funded transportation to patients receiving gynecologic cancer treatment at 5 University of Pennsylvania practices. Patients are screened for transportation barriers at first visit and re-screened during care. Patients who screen positive are referred to the intervention, a HIPAA-compliant ride-sharing service. There are no income or insurance restrictions; distance was limited to 25 miles. We report descriptive statistics on ride completion, distance traveled, and cost.

Results: In the 15-month pilot, 133 of 4,376 patients (3%) screened positive, and 48 (1%) patients received rides. Of 85 patients who screened positive, but did not receive ride-sharing, 43 (51%) had transportation assistance through their insurance, 12 (14%) lived more than 25 miles away, and the remainder (30; 35%) identified alternative transportation. Patients who received transportation assistance were more likely to be older, self-identify as a race other than white, have Medicare or Medicaid insurance, and have a higher ECOG score than the overall patient population. Eight patients received a single ride, and the rest (n = 40) received multiple rides (range 2-30) for total of 417 rides. The mean time via ride-sharing was 19.5 min shorter than public transportation, and mean cost of a one-way trip was $25.75 (range $13.83-129.91).

Conclusion: A rideshare service served a socially-vulnerable population and reduced commute times to oncology visits, which may contribute to more equitable access to cancer care. Further research on clinical outcomes is needed to understand the impact of transportation assistance on equitable cancer care delivery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇科肿瘤科的交通辅助拼车服务:质量改进研究。
目的:交通障碍可导致延误护理和次优治疗。我们的目的是评估一种新型运输试点干预在妇科肿瘤中的应用。方法:自2022年5月以来,我们在宾夕法尼亚大学的5个诊所为接受妇科癌症治疗的患者提供捐赠者资助的交通工具。在首次就诊时对患者进行交通障碍筛查,并在护理期间重新筛查。筛查呈阳性的患者会被转介到干预,这是一种符合hipaa的乘车共享服务。没有收入或保险限制;距离限制在25英里以内。我们报告的描述性统计骑车完成,路程,和成本。结果:在15个月的试点中,4376名患者中有133名(3%)筛查呈阳性,48名(1%)患者接受了治疗。在85名筛查呈阳性但未接受乘车共享的患者中,43名(51%)通过保险获得交通援助,12名(14%)居住在25英里以外,其余(30名;35%)确定了替代交通工具。接受交通援助的患者更可能是老年人,自我认同为白人以外的种族,有医疗保险或医疗补助保险,并且ECOG评分高于整体患者群体。8名患者接受了单次骑行,其余(n = 40)接受了多次骑行(范围2-30),总共417次骑行。通过拼车的平均时间比公共交通短19.5分钟,单程平均费用为25.75美元(范围为13.83-129.91美元)。结论:拼车服务服务于社会弱势群体,减少了肿瘤就诊的通勤时间,这可能有助于更公平地获得癌症治疗。需要对临床结果进行进一步研究,以了解交通援助对公平的癌症护理提供的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Impact of day-surgery on cancer treatment costs: a city-level case study in Ningxia, China. Organisational learning and the evolution of ischaemic stroke care in a resource-constrained public hospital: a seven-year case study. Determinants of sustainable quality improvement for operating room clean air systems: a two-phase sequential qualitative study in Dutch hospitals. Do publicly funded health insurance schemes reduce out-of-pocket expenditure?: Evidence from India. Psychosocial supports for staff in maternity hospitals and units following adverse events: a mapping study in the Republic of Ireland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1