A high HEMSTOP bleeding score is a major independent risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07281-0
Florian Deleu, Sophie Nebout, Edith Peynaud-Debayle, Laurent Mandelbrot, Hawa Keita
{"title":"A high HEMSTOP bleeding score is a major independent risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Florian Deleu, Sophie Nebout, Edith Peynaud-Debayle, Laurent Mandelbrot, Hawa Keita","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07281-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a common yet potentially serious complication of delivery. Recently, the HEMSTOP bleeding score has emerged as a tool for detecting preoperative inherited bleeding disorders. Our objective is to investigate its relevance within the obstetrical context for predicting PPH occurrences among unselected pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary maternity hospital between 2014 and 2016 including women without any known bleeding disorder nor antithrombotic therapy who completed the HEMSTOP questionnaire before delivery. Primary outcome was primary PPH ≥ 500 mL following delivery. We studied the bleeding score ranging from zero to seven both as a continuous and an ordinal variable. We used multivariable analysis with adjustment on PPH risk factors. We also estimated the measures of the bleeding score prognostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPH occurred in 116 of 2536 women (4.6%). Elevated bleeding scores were associated with increased PPH risk (adjusted RR = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.02; P < 0.001 for a continuous score) demonstrating a progressive rise in risk alongside score escalation (adjusted RR = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.46 for a score of one, adjusted RR = 2.11, 95% CI 0.86 to 5.20 for a score of two and adjusted RR = 7.20, 95% CI 2.54 to 20.41 for a score of three compared with a score of zero; P < 0.001). The area under the curve for the bleeding score accuracy in predicting PPH was 0.56 [95% CI 0.52 to 0.61].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HEMSTOP bleeding score is weakly predictive of PPH. Women scoring ≥ three are at high risk of PPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07281-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a common yet potentially serious complication of delivery. Recently, the HEMSTOP bleeding score has emerged as a tool for detecting preoperative inherited bleeding disorders. Our objective is to investigate its relevance within the obstetrical context for predicting PPH occurrences among unselected pregnant women.

Methods: Prospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary maternity hospital between 2014 and 2016 including women without any known bleeding disorder nor antithrombotic therapy who completed the HEMSTOP questionnaire before delivery. Primary outcome was primary PPH ≥ 500 mL following delivery. We studied the bleeding score ranging from zero to seven both as a continuous and an ordinal variable. We used multivariable analysis with adjustment on PPH risk factors. We also estimated the measures of the bleeding score prognostic accuracy.

Results: PPH occurred in 116 of 2536 women (4.6%). Elevated bleeding scores were associated with increased PPH risk (adjusted RR = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.02; P < 0.001 for a continuous score) demonstrating a progressive rise in risk alongside score escalation (adjusted RR = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.46 for a score of one, adjusted RR = 2.11, 95% CI 0.86 to 5.20 for a score of two and adjusted RR = 7.20, 95% CI 2.54 to 20.41 for a score of three compared with a score of zero; P < 0.001). The area under the curve for the bleeding score accuracy in predicting PPH was 0.56 [95% CI 0.52 to 0.61].

Conclusions: The HEMSTOP bleeding score is weakly predictive of PPH. Women scoring ≥ three are at high risk of PPH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
A retrospective study comparing maternal-infant outcome analysis of live births from patients undergoing painless oocyte retrieval versus conventional oocyte retrieval. Association between triglyceride glucose-body mass index and gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Association of the triglyceride-glucose index and the ratio of triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with fetal macrosomia in nulliparous pregnant women: a prospective case-control study. Effect of gestational weight gain on adverse birth outcomes in twin pregnancies: a prospective cohort study in Chinese women. Exploring potential causal relationships between gut microbiota, inflammatory factors, and postpartum depression: a Mendelian randomization analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1