Acceptability and fidelity of the multidomain 'Brain Bootcamp' dementia risk reduction program: a mixed-methods approach.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-21641-7
Joyce Siette, Laura Dodds, Cristy Brooks, Kay Deckers, Sebastian Köhler, Christopher J Armitage
{"title":"Acceptability and fidelity of the multidomain 'Brain Bootcamp' dementia risk reduction program: a mixed-methods approach.","authors":"Joyce Siette, Laura Dodds, Cristy Brooks, Kay Deckers, Sebastian Köhler, Christopher J Armitage","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-21641-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interventions targeting dementia prevention typically lack comprehensive exploration of feasibility, acceptability, and long-term translation factors prior to deployment. Our study aimed to explore the acceptability, fidelity and participants' experiences with Brain Bootcamp, a multi-domain behaviour change intervention targeting reduced dementia risk and increased dementia risk factor awareness for older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted in New South Wales, Australia, from January to August 2021, our concurrent single-group mixed-methods feasibility study involved post-intervention surveys and qualitative interviews with community-dwelling older adults. Descriptive statistics were used to assess acceptability of the methods, outcome measures, and fidelity to the program components. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews explored participant experiences, preferences, barriers, and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 853 enrolled participants, only 355 completed the program (41.6%). Among these participants, 79.1% agreed that the intervention improved their awareness of dementia risk factors, and 92.4% expressed intent to continue maintaining brain healthy behaviours post- program. Participants typically set 2-4 modifiable risk factor lifestyle goals, which were most often related to physical activity (83.7%). A majority (91.5%) successfully achieved at least one brain health goal. Qualitative analyses (n = 195) identified three overarching themes on the role of education on behaviour modification (i.e., the transformative role of the program in enhancing knowledge about dementia prevention and fostering behavioral modifications), psychological considerations (e.g., intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation on their engagement and perception of the program) and future directions (e.g., sustainability concerns and the need for tailored strategies for specific demographics).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While Brain Bootcamp had low completion rates, those who completed the program reported high acceptability. Future refinements, incorporating targeted strategies and enhanced participant support and communication, will facilitate pragmatic initiatives.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>ACTRN12621000165886.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"619"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21641-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interventions targeting dementia prevention typically lack comprehensive exploration of feasibility, acceptability, and long-term translation factors prior to deployment. Our study aimed to explore the acceptability, fidelity and participants' experiences with Brain Bootcamp, a multi-domain behaviour change intervention targeting reduced dementia risk and increased dementia risk factor awareness for older adults.

Methods: Conducted in New South Wales, Australia, from January to August 2021, our concurrent single-group mixed-methods feasibility study involved post-intervention surveys and qualitative interviews with community-dwelling older adults. Descriptive statistics were used to assess acceptability of the methods, outcome measures, and fidelity to the program components. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews explored participant experiences, preferences, barriers, and recommendations.

Results: Out of 853 enrolled participants, only 355 completed the program (41.6%). Among these participants, 79.1% agreed that the intervention improved their awareness of dementia risk factors, and 92.4% expressed intent to continue maintaining brain healthy behaviours post- program. Participants typically set 2-4 modifiable risk factor lifestyle goals, which were most often related to physical activity (83.7%). A majority (91.5%) successfully achieved at least one brain health goal. Qualitative analyses (n = 195) identified three overarching themes on the role of education on behaviour modification (i.e., the transformative role of the program in enhancing knowledge about dementia prevention and fostering behavioral modifications), psychological considerations (e.g., intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation on their engagement and perception of the program) and future directions (e.g., sustainability concerns and the need for tailored strategies for specific demographics).

Conclusions: While Brain Bootcamp had low completion rates, those who completed the program reported high acceptability. Future refinements, incorporating targeted strategies and enhanced participant support and communication, will facilitate pragmatic initiatives.

Clinical trial number: ACTRN12621000165886.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the dynamics of HIV transmission among young homosexual and bisexual men in Korea. Effectiveness of referral to a population-level telephone coaching service for improving health risk behaviours in people with a mental health condition: a randomised controlled trial. Socioeconomic disparities in the prevalence of depression and anxiety, and their associations with diabetes in rural southwest China. The impact of air pollutants on emergency ambulance dispatches due to mental and behavioral disorders in Shenzhen, China. The prevalence and factors associated with food neophobia in preschool children: a cross-sectional study in Jiangsu Province, China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1