Long-Term Outcomes of Fontan Patients with an Extracardiac Conduit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Canadian Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.cjca.2025.02.017
Marienell Talla, Nathan Best, Abhinay Challa, Sruthy Balakumar, Sergio Lopez-Tejero, Ella Huszti, Eric Horlick, Rafael Alonso-Gonzalez, Lusine Abrahamyan
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Fontan Patients with an Extracardiac Conduit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Marienell Talla, Nathan Best, Abhinay Challa, Sruthy Balakumar, Sergio Lopez-Tejero, Ella Huszti, Eric Horlick, Rafael Alonso-Gonzalez, Lusine Abrahamyan","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2025.02.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While Fontan palliation improves survival, it poses a large burden of lifelong morbidity. In extracardiac Fontan (ECF) patients, for example, conduit stenosis developed over time has been associated with Fontan failure and other adverse outcomes. This systematic review, for the first time, synthesized existing data on various long-term outcomes of ECF patients, including change in conduit and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane from inception to 2023 and included studies reporting separate results for ECF patients with a follow-up time of 3 or more years. Full-text studies were assessed for risk of bias. We summarized information on study, patient characteristics and outcomes narratively and using descriptive tables. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled incidence rates of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 61 full-text studies, with most studies published after 2009 (77.0%) and used a retrospective cohort design (76.2%). The pooled incidence rates per 100 person-years for: arrhythmia was 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3 - 2.6), thrombotic events was 0.2 (95% CI: 0.1 - 0.4), protein-losing enteropathy was 0.7 (95% CI: 0.5 - 1.0), conduit obstruction was 0.7 (95% CI: 0.3 - 1.5), re-operations was 1.9 (95% CI: 1.1 - 3.4), and late death was 0.3 (95% CI: 0.2 - 0.5). The ranges of hemodynamic and exercise parameters and findings from studies reporting changes in conduit size and liver disease were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While many studies have largely focused on long-term survival, several other adverse outcomes require further research to develop consensus-based definitions and approaches for evaluations, especially as the ECF population ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":9555,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2025.02.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While Fontan palliation improves survival, it poses a large burden of lifelong morbidity. In extracardiac Fontan (ECF) patients, for example, conduit stenosis developed over time has been associated with Fontan failure and other adverse outcomes. This systematic review, for the first time, synthesized existing data on various long-term outcomes of ECF patients, including change in conduit and associated outcomes.

Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane from inception to 2023 and included studies reporting separate results for ECF patients with a follow-up time of 3 or more years. Full-text studies were assessed for risk of bias. We summarized information on study, patient characteristics and outcomes narratively and using descriptive tables. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled incidence rates of adverse events.

Results: We included 61 full-text studies, with most studies published after 2009 (77.0%) and used a retrospective cohort design (76.2%). The pooled incidence rates per 100 person-years for: arrhythmia was 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3 - 2.6), thrombotic events was 0.2 (95% CI: 0.1 - 0.4), protein-losing enteropathy was 0.7 (95% CI: 0.5 - 1.0), conduit obstruction was 0.7 (95% CI: 0.3 - 1.5), re-operations was 1.9 (95% CI: 1.1 - 3.4), and late death was 0.3 (95% CI: 0.2 - 0.5). The ranges of hemodynamic and exercise parameters and findings from studies reporting changes in conduit size and liver disease were reported.

Conclusions: While many studies have largely focused on long-term survival, several other adverse outcomes require further research to develop consensus-based definitions and approaches for evaluations, especially as the ECF population ages.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Canadian Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
8.10%
发文量
546
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Cardiology (CJC) is the official journal of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS). The CJC is a vehicle for the international dissemination of new knowledge in cardiology and cardiovascular science, particularly serving as the major venue for Canadian cardiovascular medicine.
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms and Prognosis of Intolerance to Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitors in Advanced Heart Failure: Insights from Vasodilator Challenge. New Insights into Genetic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathies. Pulmonary Ridge Coverage: A Two-Edged Sword in Left Atrial Appendage Closure with LAmbre. Integrative Omics Approaches in Cardiovascular Disease Research: Current Trends and Future Directions. Long-Term Outcomes of Fontan Patients with an Extracardiac Conduit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1