The Association of Modic Changes and Disc-Endplate-Bone Marrow Complex Classification in Patients With Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1177/21925682251320893
T Jagadish, Chandhan Murugan, Karthik Ramachandran, Pushpa Bhari Thippeswamy, Sri Vijay Anand K S, Rishi Mugesh Kanna, Ajoy Prasad Shetty, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
{"title":"The Association of Modic Changes and Disc-Endplate-Bone Marrow Complex Classification in Patients With Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease.","authors":"T Jagadish, Chandhan Murugan, Karthik Ramachandran, Pushpa Bhari Thippeswamy, Sri Vijay Anand K S, Rishi Mugesh Kanna, Ajoy Prasad Shetty, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1177/21925682251320893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association of Modic changes and DEBC classification in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study includes 2 groups, neck pain patients presenting to the out-patient services (neck pain group) (n = 301) and polytrauma patients without cervical spine injury or a history of neck pain, who underwent whole spine MRI (control group) (n = 200). Degenerative changes in the MRI were classified according to the Modic changes (MC) and DEBC classification. Modifiers including End-Plate (EP) erosion and herniation (H+) presence were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3612 EPs of 301 patients with neck pain and 2400 EPs of 200 controls were assessed. The incidence of MC and DEBC in the neck pain group was 20.93% and in the control group, it was 12%, (<i>P</i> < 0.05). In the neck pain group with DEBC changes, the distribution was Type A-6.51%; Type B-20.71%; Type C-71.6%; and Type D - 1.18%, while in the controls the distribution was Type A-10.29%, Type B-29.41%, Type C-54.41%, and Type D - 5.88%, The co-occurrence of H+ with DEBC in cases and controls was 13.95% vs 5.5% (<i>P</i> < 0.005). The odds ratio for the need for surgery was highest (OR: 6.8) when H+ and DEBC change co-occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights that patients with DEBC changes and disc herniation were more likely to experience neck pain and require surgical intervention, indicating the reliability and clinical significance of the DEBC classification in degenerative cervical spine patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251320893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251320893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Observational cohort study.

Objective: To assess the association of Modic changes and DEBC classification in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease.

Methods: The study includes 2 groups, neck pain patients presenting to the out-patient services (neck pain group) (n = 301) and polytrauma patients without cervical spine injury or a history of neck pain, who underwent whole spine MRI (control group) (n = 200). Degenerative changes in the MRI were classified according to the Modic changes (MC) and DEBC classification. Modifiers including End-Plate (EP) erosion and herniation (H+) presence were documented.

Results: 3612 EPs of 301 patients with neck pain and 2400 EPs of 200 controls were assessed. The incidence of MC and DEBC in the neck pain group was 20.93% and in the control group, it was 12%, (P < 0.05). In the neck pain group with DEBC changes, the distribution was Type A-6.51%; Type B-20.71%; Type C-71.6%; and Type D - 1.18%, while in the controls the distribution was Type A-10.29%, Type B-29.41%, Type C-54.41%, and Type D - 5.88%, The co-occurrence of H+ with DEBC in cases and controls was 13.95% vs 5.5% (P < 0.005). The odds ratio for the need for surgery was highest (OR: 6.8) when H+ and DEBC change co-occurred.

Conclusion: Our study highlights that patients with DEBC changes and disc herniation were more likely to experience neck pain and require surgical intervention, indicating the reliability and clinical significance of the DEBC classification in degenerative cervical spine patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Rare Complications in Endoscopic Spinal Surgery: A Narrative Review of Unique Cases. Rapid Manufacturing, Regulatory Approval, and Utilization of Patient-specific 3D-Printed Titanium Implants for Complex Multistage Spinal Surgeries. Evaluating Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Cord Injury Management: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT-4o and Google Gemini Against American College of Surgeons Best Practices Guidelines for Spine Injury. Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Predictive Factors for Moderate and Severe Pulmonary Impairment in 102 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Patients With Major Cobb Angle ≥45°: A Study of an Asian Population. The Impact of Hypoalbuminemia on Outcomes in Non-Surgically Treated Patients With Central Cord Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1