A Retrospective Cohort Study of Tranexamic Acid Administration for the Treatment of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema in the Emergency Department.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.10.001
Michael Loewe, Eric Rowley, Joel Mosley, Benjamin Gibson, Michael Cerjance, Elizabeth Pearson, Greggory Davis
{"title":"A Retrospective Cohort Study of Tranexamic Acid Administration for the Treatment of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Michael Loewe, Eric Rowley, Joel Mosley, Benjamin Gibson, Michael Cerjance, Elizabeth Pearson, Greggory Davis","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment options for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema (ACEi-AE) are primarily limited to airway monitoring and protection with intubation. The efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) in this context remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine outcomes among patients treated with and without TXA for ACEi-AE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study conducted in two hospitals examined emergency department patients with suspected ACEi-AE from 2017 to 2021. Primary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission, intubation, days intubated, time to administration of TXA, surgical airway required, and death in patients that received TXA compared with those that did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 336 eligible patients, 37 received TXA and 299 did not. ICU admission rate was significantly higher in the TXA group (57%) vs. the no-TXA group (15%), odds ratio (OR) 7.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.69-15.70). There were significantly more intubations in the TXA group (20%) vs. the no-TXA group (5.7%), OR 3.87 (95% CI 1.49-10.08). The median time to TXA administration was 51 min (interquartile range 34-131). The number of days intubated, surgical airway, and 30-day mortality were not significantly different in the TXA group compared with the no-TXA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TXA use did not improve many of the clinical outcomes involved in the treatment of ACEi-AE. One interpretation of these results may be that TXA use was associated with patients who presented with more severe disease, as TXA use was up to the discretion of the treating physician. Randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the efficacy of TXA use in ACEi-AE.</p>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.10.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment options for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema (ACEi-AE) are primarily limited to airway monitoring and protection with intubation. The efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) in this context remains poorly understood.

Objective: Examine outcomes among patients treated with and without TXA for ACEi-AE.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study conducted in two hospitals examined emergency department patients with suspected ACEi-AE from 2017 to 2021. Primary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission, intubation, days intubated, time to administration of TXA, surgical airway required, and death in patients that received TXA compared with those that did not.

Results: Of 336 eligible patients, 37 received TXA and 299 did not. ICU admission rate was significantly higher in the TXA group (57%) vs. the no-TXA group (15%), odds ratio (OR) 7.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.69-15.70). There were significantly more intubations in the TXA group (20%) vs. the no-TXA group (5.7%), OR 3.87 (95% CI 1.49-10.08). The median time to TXA administration was 51 min (interquartile range 34-131). The number of days intubated, surgical airway, and 30-day mortality were not significantly different in the TXA group compared with the no-TXA group.

Conclusion: TXA use did not improve many of the clinical outcomes involved in the treatment of ACEi-AE. One interpretation of these results may be that TXA use was associated with patients who presented with more severe disease, as TXA use was up to the discretion of the treating physician. Randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the efficacy of TXA use in ACEi-AE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂诱发血管性水肿(ACEi-AE)的治疗方案主要限于气道监测和插管保护。在这种情况下,氨甲环酸(TXA)的疗效仍鲜为人知:方法:一项回顾性队列研究:在两家医院开展的一项回顾性队列研究对2017年至2021年期间急诊科疑似ACEi-AE患者进行了检查。主要结果包括与未接受 TXA 治疗的患者相比,接受 TXA 治疗的患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)、插管、插管天数、使用 TXA 的时间、所需手术气道以及死亡情况:结果:在 336 名符合条件的患者中,37 人接受了促肾上腺皮质激素治疗,299 人未接受治疗。TXA组(57%)与未使用TXA组(15%)相比,ICU入院率明显更高,几率比(OR)为7.61(95% 置信区间[CI] 3.69-15.70)。TXA组插管率(20%)明显高于无TXA组(5.7%),OR为3.87(95% CI为1.49-10.08)。使用 TXA 的中位时间为 51 分钟(四分位间范围为 34-131)。TXA组与未使用TXA组相比,插管天数、手术气道和30天死亡率无显著差异:结论:使用 TXA 并不能改善 ACEi-AE 治疗的许多临床结果。对这些结果的一种解释可能是,使用TXA与病情较重的患者有关,因为TXA的使用由主治医生决定。需要进行随机对照试验来明确使用 TXA 对 ACEi-AE 的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
期刊最新文献
Neuro-Behcet's Masquerading as Status Epilepticus and Meningoencephalitis in the Emergency Department A Prospective Crossover Study Comparing Six Current Generation Supraglottic Airway Device's Ability to Seal During CPR in Human Cadavers Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Nerve Block for Relief of Acute Cholecystitis Pain Vaginal Pain and Discharge Characteristics of Intracranial Hemorrhage and Acute Aortic Syndromes Resuscitated with Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1