Effects of anesthesia on cerebral oxygen saturation and prevention of brain injury during carotid endarterectomy.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1186/s13019-025-03342-9
Aikebaier Nuermaimaiti, Shan-Shan Li, Yu-Qian Li, Jian-Rong Ye
{"title":"Effects of anesthesia on cerebral oxygen saturation and prevention of brain injury during carotid endarterectomy.","authors":"Aikebaier Nuermaimaiti, Shan-Shan Li, Yu-Qian Li, Jian-Rong Ye","doi":"10.1186/s13019-025-03342-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effects of general intravenous anesthesia and combined inhalation anesthesia on regional saturation of oxygen (rSO<sub>2</sub>) and cerebral hemodynamics during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Optimizing intraoperative brain protection strategies has become a key focus in CEA research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-four patients (43 males, 11 females, aged 44-80) undergoing unilateral CEA were randomly assigned to Group IVA (intravenous anesthesia) or Group CIA (combined inhalation anesthesia), with 27 patients each. Group IVA was maintained with propofol and remifentanil, while Group CIA used sevoflurane, propofol, and remifentanil, with sevoflurane stopped after carotid exposure. Hemodynamics were controlled at various stages: ±10% before clamping, + 20% during clamping (metaraminol), and 0 to -10% after exposure. HR, MAP, and rSO₂ were recorded at T0 (pre-induction), T1 (pre-clamping), T2 (post-clamping), T3 (5 min post-clamping), T4 (10 min post-clamping), T5 (15 min post-clamping), and T6 (15 min post-reperfusion). Blood samples were taken at T1, T6, and T7 (24 h post-surgery) for blood gas and S100-β analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in rSO₂ were observed at T0 and T6 (P > 0.05). However, Group CIA had significantly higher rScO₂ at T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 (P < 0.05). From T2 to T5, rSO₂ increased in both groups (P < 0.05). MAP and HR showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). ΔrSO₂ increased more in Group CIA (P < 0.05). At T6, S100-β protein was higher in Group IVA (P = 0.016), and pH differed significantly at T1 (P = 0.009). No other significant differences were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both intravenous and combined inhalation anesthesia may reduce rSO₂ decline during temporary clamping in CEA. Combined inhalation anesthesia showed a trend toward higher rSO₂ levels, potentially leading to better outcomes, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Retrospectively registered clinical trial number: </strong>ISRCTN17014575; Registration Date: 2024/6/10.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829386/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03342-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the effects of general intravenous anesthesia and combined inhalation anesthesia on regional saturation of oxygen (rSO2) and cerebral hemodynamics during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Optimizing intraoperative brain protection strategies has become a key focus in CEA research.

Methods: Fifty-four patients (43 males, 11 females, aged 44-80) undergoing unilateral CEA were randomly assigned to Group IVA (intravenous anesthesia) or Group CIA (combined inhalation anesthesia), with 27 patients each. Group IVA was maintained with propofol and remifentanil, while Group CIA used sevoflurane, propofol, and remifentanil, with sevoflurane stopped after carotid exposure. Hemodynamics were controlled at various stages: ±10% before clamping, + 20% during clamping (metaraminol), and 0 to -10% after exposure. HR, MAP, and rSO₂ were recorded at T0 (pre-induction), T1 (pre-clamping), T2 (post-clamping), T3 (5 min post-clamping), T4 (10 min post-clamping), T5 (15 min post-clamping), and T6 (15 min post-reperfusion). Blood samples were taken at T1, T6, and T7 (24 h post-surgery) for blood gas and S100-β analysis.

Results: No significant differences in rSO₂ were observed at T0 and T6 (P > 0.05). However, Group CIA had significantly higher rScO₂ at T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 (P < 0.05). From T2 to T5, rSO₂ increased in both groups (P < 0.05). MAP and HR showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). ΔrSO₂ increased more in Group CIA (P < 0.05). At T6, S100-β protein was higher in Group IVA (P = 0.016), and pH differed significantly at T1 (P = 0.009). No other significant differences were observed.

Conclusion: Both intravenous and combined inhalation anesthesia may reduce rSO₂ decline during temporary clamping in CEA. Combined inhalation anesthesia showed a trend toward higher rSO₂ levels, potentially leading to better outcomes, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Retrospectively registered clinical trial number: ISRCTN17014575; Registration Date: 2024/6/10.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈动脉内膜切除术中麻醉对脑氧饱和度的影响及脑损伤的预防。
背景:本研究旨在探讨全身静脉麻醉和联合吸入麻醉对颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)中局部血氧饱和度(rSO2)和脑血流动力学的影响。优化术中脑保护策略已成为CEA研究的重点。方法:54例单侧CEA患者(男43例,女11例,年龄44 ~ 80岁)随机分为IVA组(静脉麻醉)和CIA组(联合吸入麻醉),每组27例。IVA组使用异丙酚和瑞芬太尼维持,CIA组使用七氟醚、异丙酚和瑞芬太尼,颈动脉暴露后停用七氟醚。血流动力学控制在不同阶段:夹紧前±10%,夹紧时+ 20%(甲氨醇),暴露后0 ~ -10%。分别在T0(诱导前)、T1(夹紧前)、T2(夹紧后)、T3(夹紧后5分钟)、T4(夹紧后10分钟)、T5(夹紧后15分钟)、T6(再灌注后15分钟)记录HR、MAP、rSO₂。分别于术后T1、T6、T7(术后24 h)采血,进行血气和S100-β分析。结果:T0、T6时rSO 2无显著性差异(P < 0.05)。而CIA组在T1、T2、T3、T4、T5时的rScO 2显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论:静脉和联合吸入麻醉均可减轻CEA临时夹持时rSO₂的下降。联合吸入麻醉显示出更高的rSO₂水平的趋势,可能导致更好的结果,但需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。回顾性注册临床试验号:ISRCTN17014575;报名日期:2016/6/10
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
期刊最新文献
The effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy-related frailty by analytic morphomics in esophageal cancer. Growth patterns of ascending aortic aneurysms. From hemoptysis to thrombosis: a comprehensive case study of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome in a young female. Correlation between Cx37 and ALK expression and prognosis of elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Salvage sleeve-pneumonectomy for a malignant bronchomediastinal fistula and the feasibility of a modified tritube®: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1