Lower limb pointing to assess intersegmental dynamics after incomplete spinal cord injury and the associated role of proprioceptive impairments.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1186/s12984-025-01542-x
Raza N Malik, Daniel S Marigold, Mason Chow, Gevorg Eginyan, Tania Lam
{"title":"Lower limb pointing to assess intersegmental dynamics after incomplete spinal cord injury and the associated role of proprioceptive impairments.","authors":"Raza N Malik, Daniel S Marigold, Mason Chow, Gevorg Eginyan, Tania Lam","doi":"10.1186/s12984-025-01542-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disorders in the recovery of gait strategies in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) suggest difficulties in controlling lower limb intersegmental dynamics, which could relate to proprioceptive impairments. To probe discrete aspects of lower limb interjoint coordination, we present here a novel protocol to assess lower limb motor strategies and evaluate the influence of proprioceptive impairments following SCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve able-bodied controls and 16 participants with SCI performed lower limb pointing to three targets that involved combined hip and knee flexion, or hip or knee flexion only while standing, with either full or obstructed visual feedback. We quantified lower limb proprioceptive sense in individuals with SCI using a robotic gait device. We used motion analysis to determine lower limb joint angles and foot trajectory, computed inverse dynamics to quantify joint and intersegmental dynamics, and derived muscle torque as an indicator of the motor strategies produced to control the motion to each target. We used linear mixed-effects models to assess differences between the control and SCI groups on end-point performance and muscle torque, and to assess the relationship of muscle torque with end-point performance and proprioceptive sense.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups differed in motor strategies, but not end-point performance, when pointing to all three targets. Compared to controls, the SCI group had difficulty controlling knee muscle torque when performing the hip-flexion-only target (p = 0.008) or when flexing the hip and knee simultaneously (p = 0.0004). To complete the knee-flexion-only target, the SCI group had difficulties generating the required hip extensor muscle torque to maintain the thigh in neutral (p = 0.0001). These altered motor strategies in individuals with SCI were associated with proprioceptive impairments and end-point performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This novel lower limb pointing task can identify disordered motor strategies in individuals with SCI, especially at the knee, and are associated with proprioceptive impairment. Variations of this paradigm can be employed to further understand differences in motor strategies between controls and individuals with SCI, and the impact of proprioceptive deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01542-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disorders in the recovery of gait strategies in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) suggest difficulties in controlling lower limb intersegmental dynamics, which could relate to proprioceptive impairments. To probe discrete aspects of lower limb interjoint coordination, we present here a novel protocol to assess lower limb motor strategies and evaluate the influence of proprioceptive impairments following SCI.

Methods: Twelve able-bodied controls and 16 participants with SCI performed lower limb pointing to three targets that involved combined hip and knee flexion, or hip or knee flexion only while standing, with either full or obstructed visual feedback. We quantified lower limb proprioceptive sense in individuals with SCI using a robotic gait device. We used motion analysis to determine lower limb joint angles and foot trajectory, computed inverse dynamics to quantify joint and intersegmental dynamics, and derived muscle torque as an indicator of the motor strategies produced to control the motion to each target. We used linear mixed-effects models to assess differences between the control and SCI groups on end-point performance and muscle torque, and to assess the relationship of muscle torque with end-point performance and proprioceptive sense.

Results: Groups differed in motor strategies, but not end-point performance, when pointing to all three targets. Compared to controls, the SCI group had difficulty controlling knee muscle torque when performing the hip-flexion-only target (p = 0.008) or when flexing the hip and knee simultaneously (p = 0.0004). To complete the knee-flexion-only target, the SCI group had difficulties generating the required hip extensor muscle torque to maintain the thigh in neutral (p = 0.0001). These altered motor strategies in individuals with SCI were associated with proprioceptive impairments and end-point performance.

Conclusion: This novel lower limb pointing task can identify disordered motor strategies in individuals with SCI, especially at the knee, and are associated with proprioceptive impairment. Variations of this paradigm can be employed to further understand differences in motor strategies between controls and individuals with SCI, and the impact of proprioceptive deficits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢指向评估不完全脊髓损伤后节段间动力学和本体感觉损伤的相关作用。
背景:不完全性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者步态策略恢复中的障碍提示其下肢节间动力学控制困难,这可能与本体感觉障碍有关。为了探讨下肢关节间协调的离散方面,我们提出了一种新的方案来评估下肢运动策略,并评估脊髓损伤后本体感觉损伤的影响。方法:12名健全的对照组和16名脊髓损伤患者进行下肢指向三个目标,包括髋关节和膝关节联合屈曲,或仅在站立时髋关节和膝关节屈曲,视觉反馈为完全或受阻。我们使用机器人步态装置量化脊髓损伤患者的下肢本体感觉。我们使用运动分析来确定下肢关节角度和足部轨迹,计算逆动力学来量化关节和节间动力学,并推导肌肉扭矩作为控制运动到每个目标的运动策略的指标。我们使用线性混合效应模型来评估对照组和脊髓损伤组在终点表现和肌肉扭矩方面的差异,并评估肌肉扭矩与终点表现和本体感觉之间的关系。结果:当指向所有三个目标时,各组在运动策略上存在差异,但在终点表现上没有差异。与对照组相比,脊髓损伤组在执行仅髋关节屈曲目标时(p = 0.008)或同时屈曲髋关节和膝关节时(p = 0.0004)难以控制膝关节肌肉扭矩。为了完成仅膝关节屈曲的目标,脊髓损伤组难以产生所需的髋伸肌扭矩来维持大腿中立(p = 0.0001)。脊髓损伤患者的这些改变的运动策略与本体感觉损伤和终点表现有关。结论:这种新颖的下肢指向任务可以识别脊髓损伤患者的运动策略紊乱,特别是在膝关节,并与本体感觉障碍有关。这种模式的变化可以用来进一步理解运动策略在对照组和脊髓损伤个体之间的差异,以及本体感觉缺陷的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Benchmarking large language models against human experts in rehabilitation medicine: a multidimensional evaluation. The effectiveness of robotic therapy in reducing upper limb spasticity in stroke survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Decoding multi-class motor attempt from the affected unilateral limbs in chronic stroke patients. Lessons learned while exploring the impact of movement-tracking feedback on the experiences of children with neuromotor disorders taking part in interactive home exercise programs: a multi-case mixed methods study. Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance sensorimotor recovery in chronic ankle instability? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1