Incidence, predictors, and sex differences in acute coronary syndrome overdiagnosis among patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.02.008
Giorgio Fiore, Giuseppe Pinto, Michele Oppizzi, Massimo Slavich, Carlo Gaspardone, Federico Furlan, Davide Valsecchi, Alberto Margonato, Gabriele Fragasso
{"title":"Incidence, predictors, and sex differences in acute coronary syndrome overdiagnosis among patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain.","authors":"Giorgio Fiore, Giuseppe Pinto, Michele Oppizzi, Massimo Slavich, Carlo Gaspardone, Federico Furlan, Davide Valsecchi, Alberto Margonato, Gabriele Fragasso","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the era of high-sensitivity troponin assays, overdiagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has become increasingly common, overriding underdiagnosis and carrying a burden of healthcare issues. This study aimed to assess the incidence, predictors, and sex differences in ACS overdiagnosis among patients presenting with chest pain (CP) to the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive CP patients presenting at the ED were included. Patients with other causes of CP, non-suspicious for ACS, were excluded. Six-month ACS rate was assessed in discharged patients. In ACS hospitalized patients, clinical records were analyzed to evaluate true-ACS incidence. Patients inappropriately hospitalized for ACS (ACS-overdiagnosis, false-positives) were compared to correctly discharged (true-negatives) and actual ACS patients (true-positives and false-negatives).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 7040 CP patients, a random sample of 1025 was included. ACS was initially diagnosed in 237 (23.1 %) patients who were hospitalized, while 788 (76.9 %) were discharged from the ED. ACS misdiagnosis occurred in 30 (2.9 %) patients: 8 (1 %) discharged patients experienced ACS at follow-up (false-negatives) while 22 (9.3 %) hospitalized for ACS were considered not to have ACS (ACS-overdiagnosis). True incident ACS at 6 months was 223 (21.8 %). Independent predictors of ACS overdiagnosis were electrocardiographic alterations, troponin T > 99° percentile, and male sex, while women were older with lower pre-test likelihood of ACS according to ED physicians, with a higher rate of early discharge but similar outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACS overdiagnosis is more frequent than underdiagnosis, carrying potential issues for the healthcare system. Patients with ACS overdiagnosis were more commonly men with elevated high-sensitivity troponin, often indistinguishable from true-ACS patients according to standard care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.02.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the era of high-sensitivity troponin assays, overdiagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has become increasingly common, overriding underdiagnosis and carrying a burden of healthcare issues. This study aimed to assess the incidence, predictors, and sex differences in ACS overdiagnosis among patients presenting with chest pain (CP) to the emergency department (ED).

Methods: Consecutive CP patients presenting at the ED were included. Patients with other causes of CP, non-suspicious for ACS, were excluded. Six-month ACS rate was assessed in discharged patients. In ACS hospitalized patients, clinical records were analyzed to evaluate true-ACS incidence. Patients inappropriately hospitalized for ACS (ACS-overdiagnosis, false-positives) were compared to correctly discharged (true-negatives) and actual ACS patients (true-positives and false-negatives).

Results: From 7040 CP patients, a random sample of 1025 was included. ACS was initially diagnosed in 237 (23.1 %) patients who were hospitalized, while 788 (76.9 %) were discharged from the ED. ACS misdiagnosis occurred in 30 (2.9 %) patients: 8 (1 %) discharged patients experienced ACS at follow-up (false-negatives) while 22 (9.3 %) hospitalized for ACS were considered not to have ACS (ACS-overdiagnosis). True incident ACS at 6 months was 223 (21.8 %). Independent predictors of ACS overdiagnosis were electrocardiographic alterations, troponin T > 99° percentile, and male sex, while women were older with lower pre-test likelihood of ACS according to ED physicians, with a higher rate of early discharge but similar outcomes.

Conclusions: ACS overdiagnosis is more frequent than underdiagnosis, carrying potential issues for the healthcare system. Patients with ACS overdiagnosis were more commonly men with elevated high-sensitivity troponin, often indistinguishable from true-ACS patients according to standard care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:在高敏肌钙蛋白检测时代,急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的过度诊断变得越来越普遍,超过了诊断不足,给医疗保健问题带来了负担。本研究旨在评估急诊科(ED)胸痛(CP)患者中 ACS 过度诊断的发生率、预测因素和性别差异:方法:纳入在急诊科就诊的连续 CP 患者。方法:纳入在急诊科就诊的连续 CP 患者,排除其他原因导致的 CP 患者,不怀疑 ACS。对出院患者的六个月 ACS 发生率进行评估。对 ACS 住院患者的临床记录进行分析,以评估真实的 ACS 发生率。将因 ACS 而不当住院的患者(ACS 过度诊断,假阳性)与正确出院的患者(真阴性)和实际 ACS 患者(真阳性和假阴性)进行比较:从 7040 名 CP 患者中随机抽取了 1025 人。237例(23.1%)住院患者被初步诊断为ACS,788例(76.9%)从急诊室出院。有 30 名患者(2.9%)被误诊为 ACS:8名(1%)出院患者在随访时出现了ACS(假阴性),而22名(9.3%)因ACS住院的患者被认为没有ACS(ACS过度诊断)。6个月时真正发生的ACS为223例(21.8%)。心电图改变、肌钙蛋白T>99°百分位数和男性是ACS过度诊断的独立预测因素,而根据急诊科医生的说法,女性年龄更大,检测前患ACS的可能性更低,提前出院率更高,但结果相似:ACS过度诊断比诊断不足更为常见,给医疗系统带来了潜在的问题。ACS过度诊断的患者多为高敏肌钙蛋白升高的男性,根据标准治疗方法,他们往往与真正的ACS患者无异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cardiology
Journal of cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Author's reply. How to demonstrate clinical implication of ECPELLA strategy in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock. Current knowledge about infective endocarditis prevention among dentists affiliated with the Japanese dental association. Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in HFpEF and obesity without diabetes mellitus. AI-echocardiography: Current status and future direction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1